Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.34s
542 S.W.2d 789 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1976
Alexander v. United States, 354 F.2d 59, 63 [5] (5th Cir. 1965); Hendrix v. United States, 327 F.2d 971, 974 [4] (5th Cir. 1964). … State v. Linzia, 412 S.W.2d 116, 120 [5] (Mo.1967); McMahon v. May Department Stores Company, 374 S.W.2d 82, 88 [4] (Mo.1963); State v. Blackmore, 327 Mo. 708, 715 , 38 S.W.2d 32, 34 [2] (1931); State v.
Cited 10 timesPublished395 S.W.3d 83 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2013
The movant, Deraughn Brown, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublished762 S.W.2d 471 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1988
One of the men, the appellant, Wonel Brown, approached Officer Ackerman. Officer Ackerman asked the appellant for some identification. … State v. Fain, 679 S.W.2d 419, 422-23 [1] (Mo.App.1984). In State v.
Cited 11 timesPublished580 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1979
Probst v. Seyer, 353 S.W.2d 798 [2] (Mo.1962). “Substantial evidence” is that which has probative force upon the issues and from which the jury can reasonably decide the case on the fact issues. Zeigenbein v. … Smith v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc., 524 S.W.2d 848 [2] (Mo. banc 1975). Defendant’s evidence contradictory or unfavorable to plaintiff’s contentions must be disregarded. Bateman v.
Cited 8 timesPublished814 S.W.2d 304 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1991
State v. Stolzman, 799 S.W.2d 927, 936 (Mo.App.1990). … See also Pennsylvania v. Bruder, 488 U.S. 9, 10 , 109 S.Ct. 205, 206 , 102 L.Ed.2d 172 (1988); State v. Pena, 784 S.W.2d at 885 ; State v. Neal, 682 S.W.2d 860 (Mo.App.1984).
Cited 11 timesPublished387 S.W.3d 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2012
Movant, Brandon Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
Cited 0 timesPublished399 S.W.3d 497 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 2013
Jimmie Lee Brown appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of driving while intoxicated. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Cited 0 timesPublished136 S.W.3d 552 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004
Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Little v. Morris, 967 S.W.2d 685, 686 (Mo.App.1998).
Cited 6 timesPublished195 Mo. App. 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1917
[State v. Smallwood, 68 Mo. 192 ; State v. Mann, 83 Mo. 589 ; State v. Mitchell; 237 Mo. 212 .] These cases did not involve the objection here, but we think they bear upon it. In State v. … Brown, 181 Mo. 192, 229 , the court said that it was, “The practice not to arrest judgment on the ground of irregularity in the summoning or the procedure of the grand jury.”
Cited 6 timesPublished65 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1877
Brown. Defendant, in his answer, alleged that the lots in which dower is demanded by plaintiff were purchased by the firm of S. … R. 28; Thornton v. Dixon, 3 Bro., Chy. R. 199; Bell v. Phyn, 7 Vesey 453; Balmain v.
Cited 6 timesPublished391 S.W.3d 887 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2013
Defendant, David Brown, appeals from the judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of trespass in the first degree, resisting arrest, violation of an order of protection, property damage in the second degree and
Cited 0 timesPublished23 S.W.3d 880 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2000
Facts Joyce Elliott Brown brought an action against Kathleen Kirkham to set aside a conveyance of real property to Kirkham by *882 Brown’s aunt, Rose Wilma Elliott. Brown v. Kirkham, 926 S.W.2d 197, 198 (Mo.App. … See Brown I, 926 S.W.2d at 201 ; Smith v. Chatfield, 797 S.W.2d 508, 509 (Mo.App. W.D.1990); McMullin, 761 S.W.2d at 719 ; Hammons v. Eisert, 745 S.W.2d 253 (Mo.App. S.D.1988).
Cited 14 timesPublished574 S.W.2d 501 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1978
The direct appeal from the convictions was upheld by this court in State v. Brown, 525 S.W.2d 565 (Mo.App.1975) but the cause was remanded for resentence under the principle of State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 525 S.W.2d l.c. 567[3]. Whether the lapse constituted ineffective assistance of counsel remains another matter.
Cited 4 timesPublished950 S.W.2d 930 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1997
Defendant, Darryl Brown, appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for stealing a motor vehicle, Sec. 570.030, RSMo 1994 * , for which he was sentenced to two years imprisonment. We affirm. … State v. Williams, 784 S.W.2d 276, 281 (Mo.App.1989).
Cited 8 timesPublished171 Mo. 477 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1903
[Griffin v. State, 4 Tex. App. 390.] The overshadowing question in this case is as to the existence of the relation of principal and agent, between the prosecuting witness Hardwick, and the defendant, J. L. Brown. … [Enterprise Soap Works v. Sayers, 55 Mo. App. 15 ; Chapman v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 542 .] In the first mentioned case, the contract of rescission was deduced from correspondence.
Cited 7 timesPublished101 Mo. App. 254 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1903
Everybody connected with this transaction, except Brown, was a member of the St. Louis Stock Exchange and knew its rules, and Drummond was on the governing board of the exchange. … Arnholt v. Hartwig, 73 Mo. 485 ; Dougherty v. Cooper, 77 Mo. 528 ; Shoe Co. v. Lisman, 149 Mo. 85 .
Cited 7 timesPublished489 S.W.3d 818 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2015
ORDER PER CURIAM Eddie Brown (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a *819 bench trial, finding him to be a prior and persistent felony offender and convicting him of first degree robbery, in violation
Cited 1 timesPublished958 S.W.2d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1997
Brown failed to establish the requisite prejudice. When instructional error arises, prejudice is judicially determined by considering the facts and instructions together. State v. … Brown timely challenged the state’s use of a peremptory challenge as to the venireperson. Ms. Brown concedes the state’s reason for striking the venireperson was race-neutral. See, e.g., State v.
Cited 10 timesPublished735 S.W.2d 155 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1987
Knight v. Keaton, 660 S.W.2d 752, 753 (Mo.App.1983). … Hohenstreet v. Sterling National Land Co., 706 S.W.2d 80 (Mo.App.1986).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna