Case law

Brown v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

411 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 1975

Brown v. Board of Education

89 A.D.3d 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 2011

488 stances, any deficiencies in the APPR do not render the determination to discontinue his employment arbitrary and capricious since the hearing testimony provided ample grounds for his termination (see Matter of Sorell v … Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 168 AD2d 453 [1990]).

Brown v. Texas Board of Nurse Examiners

194 S.W.3d 721 · Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Jun 9, 2006

Eventually, the Board obtained a default judgment against Brown for failing to appear at a hearing to determine the status of her license. In April of 2000, her license was formally revoked by the Board. … At no point before Brown filed her brief did she raise the issue she attempts to do so here. “[E]ven a constitutional claim must have been asserted in the trial court in order to be raised on appeal.” Dreyer v.

Brown v. South Carolina State Board of Education

301 S.C. 326 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Mar 19, 1990

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S. Ct. *329 2701, 33 L. Ed. (2d) 548 (1972); see also S.C. Const., Art. I, § 22. … Id.; Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S. Ct. 752 , 1 L. Ed. (2d) 796 (1957). The State must afford notice and the opportunity for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case. Roth, supra.

State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Dental Examiners

38 Wash. 325 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1905

Brown, when he presented himself for examination, that the said Edwin J. … Dental Ex. v. People ex rel. Cooper, 123 Ill. 227 , 13 N.

Brown v. Kansas Parole Board

262 Kan. 903 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jul 18, 1997

In Payne v. Kansas Parole Board, 20 Kan. … The Board appears to further argue that Johnson v. Stacker, 203 Kan. 253 , Syl. ¶ 1, 453 P.2d 35 , cert. denied 396 U.S. 904 (1969), and State v.

Brown v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

60 A.D.3d 107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 2009

Between December 1, 2005, and July 15, 2006, it would have been reasonable for Brown to believe that the Racing and Wagering Board could change its position on the issue (see Matter of Jones v Amicone, 27 AD3d 465, 468 [2006 … v Board of Educ. of Northport-E.

Brown v. Sandy City Board of Adjustment

339 Utah Adv. Rep. 13 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Mar 26, 1998

BACKGROUND Thomas and Nancy Brown, Dennis Clo-ward, and Joseph Bowers (the owners) owned homes in Sandy City. The homes owned by the Browns and Cloward were in areas zoned R-l-8 Residential. … Sandy, citing Ewing v.

Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

486 A.2d 37 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1984

In Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 413 A.2d 1276 (D.C.1980) (Brown I), we noted that two lawyers with intervenor Carr’s law firm, Iverson Mitchell and C. … Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, No. 13670 (D.C. July 15, 1983) (Brown II). Again, the division remanded the record to the BZA. Id., slip op. at 27.

State ex rel. Brown v. Butler County Board of Elections

109 Ohio St. 3d 63 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2006

Brown, Hazel Brown, Darrell E. Brown, Margy B. Beckner, John W. Brown, and James. G. Inman own certain property in Ross Township, Butler County, Ohio. ■ Relator Red Pine Properties, L.L.C. … O’Beirne v. Geauga Cty.

Brown v. Board of Supervisors

54 Miss. 230 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1876

The board of school directors of Issaquena County, to whom have succeeded the board of supervisors of said county, brought this action of ejectment for the recovery of the sixteenth section of township nine, range eight ( … If we regard the title to the lands as vested in the county, or in any of the officers or boards thereof, the Statute of Limitations will run against them. Money v. Miller, 13 S. & M. 531 .

Brown v. Board of Education of City of Pomona

103 Cal. 531 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1894

No one of them—from Zottman v. San Francisco, 20 Cal. 96 , 81 Am. Dec. 96 , to Barry v. Goad, 89 Cal. 215 ,—dealt with a question of pleading such as is presented in the case at bar. … Co. v. Murphy’s Flat Fluming Co., 22 Cal. 621 ; Shaver v. Bear River etc. Co., 10 Cal. 400 ; Evans v. Bailey, 66 Cal. 112 ; Miners’ Ditch Co. v. Zellerbach, 37 Cal. 543 ; 99 Am. Dec. 300 .)

Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

137 Pa. Commw. 575 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1991

Johnson v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Albert Einstein Medical Center), 137 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 176, 586 A.2d 991 (1991); Boehm v. … Brown prior to April 21, 1988. 1 .

Brown v. State Printing Board

230 Iowa 22 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 11, 1941

W. 74 ; Hannam v. Commerce Commission, 228 Iowa 586 , 292 N. W. 820 ; and Bowman v. Overturff, 229 Iowa 329 , 294 N. W. 568 . All three of these cases, especially Allen v. … The Allen case quotes with approval from Scott v. Brown, 90 Ind. *24 App. 367, 157 N. E. 64 , (page 810 of 218 Iowa, page 79 of 254 N.

Brown v. Suffolk County Board of Elections

264 A.D.2d 489 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 1999

Meisser, 22 NY2d 762 ; Matter of Merrill v Adler, 253 AD2d 505 ; Matter of Boyle v New York City Bd. of Elections, 185 AD2d 953 ; Matter of Zunno v Fein, 175 AD2d 935, 936 ). … The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, Matter of Ferraro v McNab, 60 NY2d 601, 603 ; Matter of Klug-man v King, 242 AD2d 346 ). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Sullivan, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Board of Professional Responsibility of Supreme Court of Tennessee

29 S.W.3d 445 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 25, 2000

Moreover, the Board, its authority, and all of its functions are derived from the Supreme Court. Fletcher v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 915 S.W.2d 448, 450 (Tenn.Ct.App.1995). … For example, in Belmont v. Board of Law Examiners, we reviewed the actions taken by another Court agency, the Board of Law Examiners. 511 S.W.2d 461 (Tenn.1974).

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka

98 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, D. Kansas · Aug 3, 1951

In the early case of Plessy v. … The Court said: “Nor need we reach petitioner’s contention that Plessy v.

Brown v. Waterbury Board of Education

247 F. Supp. 3d 196 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 28, 2017

Brown that “there was nothing he [could] do” because D’Angelo was a “rogue Board member.” (Id. at 198.) … Harhay v. Town of Ellington Bd. of Educ., 323 F.3d 206 , 213 (2d Cir. 2003). The record shows that Brown’s employment with the Board was governed by a collective bargaining agreement.

Brown v. Akron Board of Education

129 Ohio App. 3d 352 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1998

Defendant Akron Board of Education has attempted to appeal from an order of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that denied it summary judgment in a tort action brought against it by plaintiff Paul J. Brown. … In Mitchell v.

Brown v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

780 A.2d 885 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 2001

Odgers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 514 Pa. 378 , 525 A.2d 359 (1987); Russell v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Volkswagen of America), 121 Pa.Cmwlth. 436 , 550 A.2d 1364 (1988). … Shrum v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 690 A.2d 796 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997).