Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.31s
Smith v. City of Winston-Salem
247 N.C. 349 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1957
Holmes v. Fayetteville, 197 N.C. 740 , 150 S.E. 624 ; S. v. Eason, 114 N.C. 787 ; Dean Milk Co. v. Aurora, 14 A.L.R. 2d 98 ; Hyre v. Brown, 49 A.L.R. 1230 and annotations; Donable v. Harrisonburg, 104 Va. 533 , 7 Ann. … Hall v. Refining Co., 242 N.C. 707 , 89 S.E. 2d 396 ; Furniture Co. v. Baron, 243 N.C. 502 , 91 S.E. 2d 236 ; Kennerly v. Dallas, 215 N.C. 532 , 2 S.E. 2d 538 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N.C. 347 , 196 S.E. 333 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedMerrill v. Winston-Salem Forsyth Cnty. Bd. of Educ.
795 S.E.2d 219 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnderson v. SeaScape at Holden Plantation, LLC
241 N.C. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 2015
Brown, Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Special Litigation Committee, 43 U. PITT. L. REV. . 601, 644 (1982). … Co., Inc. v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedWalker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs
368 N.C. 915 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedStedman v. City of Winston-Salem
204 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1933
Pfost, 4 Pac. (2d), 377 ; City of Greenville v. Query, 164 S. E., 844 . Bowman v. Continental Oil Co., 256 U. S., 642 ; Hart Refineries v. Harmon, 278 U. S., 499 ; Breece Lumber Co. v. … This liberalizing necessity was applied by Brown, J., in tbe absentee voter case. In Jenkins v. Board of Elections, 180 N. C., 169 , 85 S.
Cited 14 timesPublished78 N.C. App. 589 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 1985
Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435 , 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974). We apply these principles to each of the claims advanced by Hawkins in his complaint. … The Supreme Court in Henry v.
Cited 18 timesPublished213 N.C. 800 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublished550 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 23, 1982
The day before he was terminated, plaintiff called Vernon Brown, the black dock foreman, “boy.” Brown complained. … Board of Education of McNeil, Arkansas, 452 F.2d 551, 552 (8th Cir. 1971); accord, Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 259 , 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1096 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207, 219 (1981).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCommissioners of Hendersonville v. Prudden & Co.
180 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1920
On the question thus presented in Board of Health v. Comrs., 173 N. … C., 908 -913; Hopper v. Covington, 118 U. S., 148 -151; Equitable Insurance Company v. Brown, 213 U. S., 25 ; Graef v. Eq. Ins. Co., 160 N. Y., 6 Pl. & Pr., pp. 336-338, etc.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKelly v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad
110 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1892
Stevens v. Brown , 82 N.C. 463 ; Griffin v. Hadley , 53 N.C. 82 . … Stevens v. Brown, supra; Knight v. Holden , 104 N.C. 107 . The truth of the principle embodied in the old maxim, "Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa," is self-evident. White v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRice Associates of the Southern Highlands, Inc. v. Town of Weaverville Zoning Board of Adjustment
108 N.C. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1992
Relying upon Crump v. Bd. of Education, 326 N.C. 603 , 392 S.E.2d 579 (1990), petitioner submits that this finding of bias is sufficient, in and of itself, to require reversal of the Zoning Board’s decision. … Donnelly v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Village of Pinehurst, 99 N.C. App. 702 , 394 S.E.2d 246 (1990).
Cited 2 timesPublishedCity of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of Education
113 N.C. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1993
Glenn v. Board of Educ., 210 N.C. 525, 529-30 , 187 S.E. 781, 784 (1936). … Smith v. County of Mecklenburg, 280 N.C. 497, 506 , 187 S.E.2d 67, 73 (1972). In McIntyre v.
Cited 0 timesPublished368 N.C. 687 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished121 N.C. 172 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897
VonGlahn and others, as aldermen, being the old mayor and board of aldermen, instituted suit against the defendants, S. P. … Mills v. Williams , 33 N.C. 558 ; Dare v. Currituck , 95 N.C. 189 ; Lilly v. Taylor , 88 N.C. 489 ; Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 ; McCormac v. Comrs. , 90 N.C. 441 ; Brown v. Comrs. , 100 N.C. 92 ; Wallace v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLilly v. . Com'rs of Cumberland Co.
69 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873
And it is the same point as in the case Ruffin v. Commissioners of Orange, at this term; where we consider it more at large.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRagland v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. Of Educ.
247 N.C. App. 738 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016
In reviewing administrative proceedings like those conducted by school boards, the trial court acts as an appellate court and may not substitute its judgment for that of a school board. See, e.g., Rector v. N.C. … RAGLAND V.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDodge v. State Highway & Public Works Commission
221 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1942
E., 218 , Brown, J., says: “It is well settled that, unless by legislative enactment, no title can be acquired against the public by user alone, nor lost to the public by non-user. Commonwealth v. Morehead, 4 Am. … We do not think the petitioner has established any rights adverse to the easement of the respondent and its predecessor in title, the Board of Commissioners of Tyrrell County.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBunting v. . Commissioners of Wake
74 N.C. 633 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876
Bunting claims to recover from the Board of Commissioners of Wake County three hundred dollars, and the Board of Commissioners of Wake County resists the claim. … Dixon Davidson v. Pace , 73 N.C. 603 . We do not mean to pass upon the liability of the State to pay this claim. All that we decide is, that the county is not bound. There is error.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHughes v. Commissioners of Craven County
107 N.C. 598 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890
Birmingham v. Ramsey, 63 Ala., 352 . The Supreme Court of West "Virginia (in Brown v. Gates, 15 W. … provided that “the deed shall be made to the Board of Commissioners, and the Board may, in its discretion, sell any land so purchased.”
Cited 16 timesPublished170 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1915
BrowN, J. … Mial v. Ellington, 134 N. C., 131 ; Bunting v. Gales, 77 N. C., 283 .
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna