Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.31s

  • Smith v. City of Winston-Salem

    247 N.C. 349 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1957

    Holmes v. Fayetteville, 197 N.C. 740 , 150 S.E. 624 ; S. v. Eason, 114 N.C. 787 ; Dean Milk Co. v. Aurora, 14 A.L.R. 2d 98 ; Hyre v. Brown, 49 A.L.R. 1230 and annotations; Donable v. Harrisonburg, 104 Va. 533 , 7 Ann. … Hall v. Refining Co., 242 N.C. 707 , 89 S.E. 2d 396 ; Furniture Co. v. Baron, 243 N.C. 502 , 91 S.E. 2d 236 ; Kennerly v. Dallas, 215 N.C. 532 , 2 S.E. 2d 538 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N.C. 347 , 196 S.E. 333 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Merrill v. Winston-Salem Forsyth Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

    795 S.E.2d 219 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. SeaScape at Holden Plantation, LLC

    241 N.C. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 2015

    Brown, Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Special Litigation Committee, 43 U. PITT. L. REV. . 601, 644 (1982). … Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Walker v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

    368 N.C. 915 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stedman v. City of Winston-Salem

    204 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1933

    Pfost, 4 Pac. (2d), 377 ; City of Greenville v. Query, 164 S. E., 844 . Bowman v. Continental Oil Co., 256 U. S., 642 ; Hart Refineries v. Harmon, 278 U. S., 499 ; Breece Lumber Co. v. … This liberalizing necessity was applied by Brown, J., in tbe absentee voter case. In Jenkins v. Board of Elections, 180 N. C., 169 , 85 S.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Hawkins v. Webster

    78 N.C. App. 589 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 1985

    Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435 , 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974). We apply these principles to each of the claims advanced by Hawkins in his complaint. … The Supreme Court in Henry v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Rankin v. . Mfg. Co.

    213 N.C. 800 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1938

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Payne v. Blue Bell, Inc.

    550 F. Supp. 1324 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 23, 1982

    The day before he was terminated, plaintiff called Vernon Brown, the black dock foreman, “boy.” Brown complained. … Board of Education of McNeil, Arkansas, 452 F.2d 551, 552 (8th Cir. 1971); accord, Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 259 , 101 S.Ct. 1089, 1096 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207, 219 (1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commissioners of Hendersonville v. Prudden & Co.

    180 N.C. 496 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1920

    On the question thus presented in Board of Health v. Comrs., 173 N. … C., 908 -913; Hopper v. Covington, 118 U. S., 148 -151; Equitable Insurance Company v. Brown, 213 U. S., 25 ; Graef v. Eq. Ins. Co., 160 N. Y., 6 Pl. & Pr., pp. 336-338, etc.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Lynchburg & Durham Railroad

    110 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1892

    Stevens v. Brown , 82 N.C. 463 ; Griffin v. Hadley , 53 N.C. 82 . … Stevens v. Brown, supra; Knight v. Holden , 104 N.C. 107 . The truth of the principle embodied in the old maxim, "Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa," is self-evident. White v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rice Associates of the Southern Highlands, Inc. v. Town of Weaverville Zoning Board of Adjustment

    108 N.C. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1992

    Relying upon Crump v. Bd. of Education, 326 N.C. 603 , 392 S.E.2d 579 (1990), petitioner submits that this finding of bias is sufficient, in and of itself, to require reversal of the Zoning Board’s decision. … Donnelly v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Village of Pinehurst, 99 N.C. App. 702 , 394 S.E.2d 246 (1990).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of Education

    113 N.C. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1993

    Glenn v. Board of Educ., 210 N.C. 525, 529-30 , 187 S.E. 781, 784 (1936). … Smith v. County of Mecklenburg, 280 N.C. 497, 506 , 187 S.E.2d 67, 73 (1972). In McIntyre v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Izydore v. City of Durham

    368 N.C. 687 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harriss v. . Wright

    121 N.C. 172 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1897

    VonGlahn and others, as aldermen, being the old mayor and board of aldermen, instituted suit against the defendants, S. P. … Mills v. Williams , 33 N.C. 558 ; Dare v. Currituck , 95 N.C. 189 ; Lilly v. Taylor , 88 N.C. 489 ; Wood v. Oxford , 97 N.C. 227 ; McCormac v. Comrs. , 90 N.C. 441 ; Brown v. Comrs. , 100 N.C. 92 ; Wallace v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lilly v. . Com'rs of Cumberland Co.

    69 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

    And it is the same point as in the case Ruffin v. Commissioners of Orange, at this term; where we consider it more at large.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ragland v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. Of Educ.

    247 N.C. App. 738 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

    In reviewing administrative proceedings like those conducted by school boards, the trial court acts as an appellate court and may not substitute its judgment for that of a school board. See, e.g., Rector v. N.C. … RAGLAND V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dodge v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

    221 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1942

    E., 218 , Brown, J., says: “It is well settled that, unless by legislative enactment, no title can be acquired against the public by user alone, nor lost to the public by non-user. Commonwealth v. Morehead, 4 Am. … We do not think the petitioner has established any rights adverse to the easement of the respondent and its predecessor in title, the Board of Commissioners of Tyrrell County.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bunting v. . Commissioners of Wake

    74 N.C. 633 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

    Bunting claims to recover from the Board of Commissioners of Wake County three hundred dollars, and the Board of Commissioners of Wake County resists the claim. … Dixon Davidson v. Pace , 73 N.C. 603 . We do not mean to pass upon the liability of the State to pay this claim. All that we decide is, that the county is not bound. There is error.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Commissioners of Craven County

    107 N.C. 598 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

    Birmingham v. Ramsey, 63 Ala., 352 . The Supreme Court of West "Virginia (in Brown v. Gates, 15 W. … provided that “the deed shall be made to the Board of Commissioners, and the Board may, in its discretion, sell any land so purchased.”

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mills v. . Deaton

    170 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1915

    BrowN, J. … Mial v. Ellington, 134 N. C., 131 ; Bunting v. Gales, 77 N. C., 283 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.