Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

0.54s

  • Short v. White

    234 Mo. App. 499 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1939

    [Beck v. Haas, 111 Mo. 264 , l. c. 268; Lyons v. Carter, 84 Mo. App. 483 , l. c. 489; Campbell Glass & Paint Co. v. Davis-Page Planing Mill Co., 130 Mo. App. 474 ; Threshing Machine Co. v. Matthews, 188 Mo. … Jur., p. 945 , par. 1085; Gordon & Koppel Clothing Co. v. N. Y. Central Ry. Co. (Mo. App.), 285 S. W. 755 ; State Bank of Pike v. Brown, 165 N. Y. 216 , 53 L. R. A. 513; 10 R. C. L., p. 1174, par. 373.]

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Salmon

    145 F. 649 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Apr 30, 1906

    Multnomah County v. Oregon National Bank (C. C.) 61 Fed. 912 ; Spokane County v. Clark (C. C.) 61 Fed. 538 ; Brown v. Board of Commissioners (Kan. Sup.) 50 Pac. 888 ; Board of Commissioners v. … App. 438 ; Wooton v. Hinkle, 20 Mo. 290 ; Hook v. Turner, 22 Mo. 333 ; Durfee v. Moran, 57 Mo. 374 -3879; Swan v. Chorpenning, 20 Cal. 182 ; Gibbs v. Smith, 113 Mass. 592 ; People v. Stephens, 71 N. Y. 527 ; Finck v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Weiss v. Leaon

    359 Mo. 1054 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1949

    Just what effect Shelley v. … Since Shelley v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Forinash v. Daugherty

    697 S.W.2d 294 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1985

    In Phelps v. … Such evidence is evidence of the fair market value of the shares, Byrd v. Brown, 641 S.W.2d 163, 176-77 [14, 15] (Mo.App.1982), but was not conclusive because at the time the sale was made, Mrs.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • State v. Flannery

    263 Mo. 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1915

    This court, in State v. Jeffries, 210 Mo. l. c. 320, and in State v. … J., concurs in a separate opinion, in which Brown, J., joins. Brown, J., concurs in result.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Queen City Wood Works Co.

    215 Mo. App. 142 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1922

    In the case of Brown v. Railroad, 227 S. W. 1069 , the St. … In the case of Henderson v. Stove & Manfg. Co., 197 S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hedges v. Pollard

    149 Mo. 216 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 31, 1899

    [Cole v. Parker, 70 Mo. l. c. 379; Battner v. Baker, 108 Mo. l. c. *224 315; Goltermann v. Schiermeyer, 111 Mo. l. c. 418.] But as was said by Henry, J., in Cole v. … As was said in Goltermann v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Grue v. Hensley

    357 Mo. 592 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1948

    Thus Ritchie v. … Co. v. Brown, 228 Mo. App. 164, 167-8 (3, 4), 65 S. W. (2d) 1064, 1065 (2-4).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri ex rel. Organic Remedies Mo. Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of St. Louis County, Missouri

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2023

    Standard of Review An appellate court reviews the findings and conclusions of the zoning board and not the judgment of the trial court. State ex rel. Teefey v. … Church v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of City of Kansas City, 543 S.W.3d 28, 34 (Mo. banc 2018) (internal quotations omitted); Mo. Const. art. V § 18.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re The Estate of Arthur E. Pethan, Mary Lu Brown, Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur E. Pethan v. David A. Hein

    475 S.W.3d 722 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 2015

    Appeals Western District IN RE THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR E. ) PETHAN, DECEASED; ) ) WD78157 MARY LU BROWN … Group, Inc. v. Fischer, 84 S.W.3d 496, 497 (Mo. App.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Phillips

    117 Mo. 389 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 27, 1893

    Rep. 43, b; Goffe v. Bibithe and Hoell David.” 1 Hale, P. C. 437. II. No error occurred in regard to the juror, Johnson, who was on the panel that tried defendant. … See State v. Burns, 85 Mo. 47 , where the point was expressly ruled. III.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wahl v. Cunningham

    320 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1928

    of directors of said bank; that, shortly after his selection as a member of the board of directors and before plaintiff had attended a board meeting as such director, it was ascertained by the said defendants, John A. and … [Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 Ed.) sec. 162.] In Thomas v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Danforth Foundation v. United States

    222 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1963

    Brown as its director, and knew that once a director of Dr. Brown’s caliber was employed, *768 programs would eventually be developed that would use the funds. … The 8th ■Circuit Court of Appeals in Duffy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fillingham v. St. Louis Transit Co.

    102 Mo. App. 573 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1903

    State v. Donnelly, 9 Mo. App. 519 ; Brown v. Railway, 13 Mo. App. 463 ; Browning v. Railway, 124 Mo. 55 ; Koehler v. Wilson, 40 Iowa 183 . … The car was so constructed that passengers could alight from it at either side by stepping on the running-board and from it to the ground; and it was expected that they would alight in that manner.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Schwandt v. Witte

    346 S.W.2d 50 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1961

    While working on a scaffold Schwandt pulled On a board, the board broke and Schwandt off balance fell to the ground fracturing his right wrist and leg. Claiming that he was employed by Richard J. … Brown, 32 N.J.Super. 413 , 108 A.2d 476 ; 99 C.J.S. Workmen’s Compensation § 106, p. 357.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Liddell v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.

    696 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 4, 1988

    696 F.Supp. 444 (1988) Craton LIDDELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO., et al., Defendants. No. 72-100 C (5). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. August 4, 1988. … Brown, and his associate Jay Moody.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Stark

    202 Mo. 210 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1907

    [State v. Hathhorn, 166 Mo. 229 ; State v. Mills, 146 Mo. 195 .] 2. … [State v. Allen, 116 Mo. l. c. 554, 555; State v. Hathhorn, 166 Mo. 236 .]

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Watson

    400 S.W.2d 129 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 14, 1966

    On said date, appellant was given thirty days in which to file a motion for new trial and a pre-sentence investigation by the State Parole Board was ordered by the trial court. … State v. Jones, Mo., 221 S.W.2d 137 ; State v. Sherry, Mo., 64 S.W.2d 238 ; State v. Vinson, Mo., 107 S.W.2d 16 ; State v. Thomas, Mo., 82 S.W.2d 885 ; State v. Brown, Mo., 245 S.W.2d 866 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Feinberg v. Pfeiffer Company

    322 S.W.2d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1959

    Middleton v. Holecraft, Mo.App., 270 S.W.2d 90 ; Solace v. T. J. Moss Tie Co., Mo.App., 142 S.W.2d 1079 ; Aslin v. Stoddard County, 341 Mo. 138 , 106 S.W.2d 472 ; Fuqua v. … Lumbermen’s Supply Co., 229 Mo.App. 210 , 76 S.W.2d 715 ; Hudson v. Browning, 264 Mo. 58 , 174 S.W. 393 ; Campbell v. American Handle Co., 117 Mo.App. 19 , 94 S.W. 815 .

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

    37 S.W.3d 228 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 31, 2001

    v. … Board of Public Bldgs. v. Crowe, 363 S.W.2d 598, 605 (Mo. banc 1962) (emphasis added). The mere process of arbitration does not create a contractual debt; any liability lies in tort and not in contract. 4.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.