Case law

Thrower Ex Rel. Lockhart v. Henwood

351 Mo. 663 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1943

Co. v. Doyle, 203 Ark. 1111 , 160 .S. W. (2d) 856, 858(5): Mo. Pac. Rd. Co. v. Eubanks, 200 Ark. 484 , 139 S. W. (2d) 413, 414 (3); Mo. Pac. Rd. Co. v. Ward, 195 Ark. 966, 971 , 115 S. ,W. (2d) 835, 837(4); Baldwin v. … Co. v. Sheppard, 194 Ark. 619 , 109 S. W. (2d) 109, 110 (3); DeQ. & E. Rd. Co. v. Pigue, 135 Ark. 499 ) 205 S. W. 888 ; L. R. & H., S. W. Rd; Co. v. McQueeney, 78 Ark. 22 , 92 S. W. 1120 . 3 Mo. Pac. Rd. Co. v.

Bogy v. Shoab

13 Mo. 365 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1850

White v. Patten, 24 Pick. 324 ; Comstock v. Smith, 13 Pick. 116 ; Jackson v. Bradford, 4 Wend. 622 ; Jackson v. Hubbell, 6 Cowen, 613; Dart v. Dart, 7 Conn. R. 256; Chew v. Barnett, 11 Serg. & Rawle, 389 . … Brown v. Jackson, 9 Wheat. 452 . Nor would it be in accordance with the manifest intent of such conveyance, that after acquired title should pass.

Baugh v. Grigsby

286 S.W.2d 798 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1956

Cullen v. Johnson, 325 Mo. 253, 271 , 29 S.W.2d 39, 46 . … See Jordan v.

Knowlton v. Ripley County Memorial Hospital

743 S.W.2d 132 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1988

Hermel, Inc. v. State Tax Commission, 564 S.W.2d 888 (Mo. banc 1978); Browning-Ferris Ind. of Kansas City v. Dance, 671 S.W.2d 801 (Mo.App.1984). … He asked the hospital board when and *134 where that was to occur. The board did not know. The reporter then called the hospital’s attorney.

Owens

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 14, 2026

Owens separately alleges that on March 25, 2007, Defendants Vickie Brown, Sharron Brown, and Thesola Dumas filed “fraudulent property documents.” Id. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)).

Straughan v. Meyers

268 Mo. 580 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 18, 1916

W. 566 ; State ex rel. v. Blaisdell, 119 N. W. 360 ; State v. Custer, 66 Atl. 306 ; Gillespie v. Palmer, 20 Wis. 544 ; Davis v. Brown, 34 S. E. 839 .] … [Glaser v. Rothschild, 221 Mo. l. c. 210.] Counsel for appellant urge that the doctrine announced in Bowers v. Smith, 111 Mo. 45 ; Hehl v. Guion, 155 Mo. 76 ; and Gass v.

St. Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. City of St. Louis

235 Mo. 99 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 7, 1911

[State v. Addington, 12 Mo. App. l. c. 217; s. c., 77 Mo. 110 ; St. Louis v. Meyrose Mfg. Co., 139 Mo. 560 ; State v. Beattie, 16 Mo. App. l. c. 145; City of Chillicothe v. Brown, 38 Mo. … [Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 555, 564 ; Chatfield v. Wilson, 28 Vt. 49 ; Phelps v. Nowlen, 72 N. Y. 39 ; Frazier v. Brown, 12 Ohio St. 294 ; Martin, B., in Rawstron v. Taylor, 11 Exch. 369, 378, 384. See Benjamin v.

Hacker v. City of Potosi

340 S.W.2d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1960

Fowler v. Baalmann Inc., Mo., 234 S.W.2d 11 ; Heaton v. Ferrell, supra; Brown v. Anthony Mfg. Co., Mo., 311 S.W.2d 23 . … Fowler v. Baalmann, supra; Heaton v. Ferrell, supra; Brown v. Anthony Mfg. Co., supra. The trial Court did not err in affirming the award of the Commission. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. WOLFE, P.

Weiss v. Leaon

359 Mo. 1054 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1949

Just what effect Shelley v. … Since Shelley v.

Baker v. Stewart Sand & Material Company

353 S.W.2d 108 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1961

When he awoke his legs itched and red spots on his legs were oozing a brown substance. … Plaintiff relies upon the cases of Haberly v. Reardon, 319 S.W.2d 859 (Mo.Sup.) and Bean v. Ross Manufacturing Co., 344 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.Sup.)

Brennan Ex Rel. Brennan v. Curators of the University of Missouri

942 S.W.2d 432 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1997

Covered Persons under the General Liability Plan include: The Employer and any of Employer’s administrative personnel; Individual members of the Board of Curators of the University of Missouri and the Board of Curators of … In reliance upon Greene County v.

Dickerson v. Chrisman

28 Mo. 134 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1859

(Benoist v. Darby, 12 Mo. 206 ; 2 Stark. 191; Muller v. Moss, 1 Maul. & Sel. 325.) There was however no necessity for such testimony in the cause, as the fact of notice was clearly established by other evidence. … The case of Davis v.

State v. Smith

586 S.W.2d 399 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1979

State v. Cheesebrew, 575 S.W.2d 218, 225 [18] (Mo.App.1978). … S. v. Hart, 557 F.2d 162 (8th Cir. 1977).

State v. Johnson

829 S.W.2d 630 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1992

State v. Anderson, 785 S.W.2d 596, 600 (Mo.App.1990). … See, State v. Twenter, 818 S.W.2d at 634 . Likewise, Johnson’s argument that this issue needs to be reconsidered in light of Cage v.

State Ex Rel. Pugh v. Public Service Commission

321 Mo. 297 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 16, 1928

[State v. M.K. T. Ry., 262 Mo. 507 , 524; Pennsylvania Railroad v. Towers, 126 Md. 59 , and same case, 245 U.S. 6 ; 10 C.J. 665, sec. 1083.] See also McGrew Coal Co. v. Mellon, 315 Mo. 798 . In State v. M.K. T. … [State ex rel. v. Busby, 274 S.W. 1067 , 1071; State ex rel. v. Commission, 297 S.W. 47 .]

In re The Estate of Arthur E. Pethan, Mary Lu Brown, Personal Representative of the Estate of Arthur E. Pethan v. David A. Hein

475 S.W.3d 722 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 2015

Appeals Western District IN RE THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR E. ) PETHAN, DECEASED; ) ) WD78157 MARY LU BROWN … Group, Inc. v. Fischer, 84 S.W.3d 496, 497 (Mo. App.

State v. Ross

680 S.W.2d 213 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1984

State v. … State v. Brown, 624 S.W.2d 543, 545 (Mo.App.1981). Point V is overruled. The judgment is affirmed. All concur.

Browning v. Wabash Western Railway Co.

124 Mo. 55 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1894

Davis v. Garrett (1830), 6 Bing. 716. … Clark v. Chambers (1878), 3 L. R. App. Cas. 327; Lowery v. Railroad (1885), 99 N. Y. 158 ; Lilly v. Railroad (1887), 107 N. Y. 566 ; St. Louis Bridge Co. v. Miller (1891), 138 Ill. 465 ; Gibney v. State (1893), 137 N.

Wahl v. Cunningham

320 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1928

of directors of said bank; that, shortly after his selection as a member of the board of directors and before plaintiff had attended a board meeting as such director, it was ascertained by the said defendants, John A. and … [Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 Ed.) sec. 162.] In Thomas v.

State of Missouri ex rel. Organic Remedies Mo. Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of St. Louis County, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2023

Standard of Review An appellate court reviews the findings and conclusions of the zoning board and not the judgment of the trial court. State ex rel. Teefey v. … Church v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of City of Kansas City, 543 S.W.3d 28, 34 (Mo. banc 2018) (internal quotations omitted); Mo. Const. art. V § 18.