Case law

Ratcliff v. Rodman

258 N.C. 60 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 31, 1962

The sole relief sought by plaintiff is the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring the Beaufort County Board of Elections “to permit the filing of plaintiff for the nomination of the Republican Party as Representative of … Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578 , 61 S.E. 2d 607 ; Nance v. Winston-Salem, 229 N.C. 732 , 51 S.E. 2d 185 ; Penland v. Gowan, 229 N.C. 449 , 50 S.E. 2d 182 ; Rousseau v. Bullis, 201 N.C. 12 , 158 S.E. 553 .

Brown v. Registrar of Deeds For Cleveland County

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Nov 26, 2024

Whitney, Bradley & Brown, Inc. v. Kammermann, 436 F. App’x 257, 258 (4th Cir. 2011) (citing Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 496 (1985)). … See Doe v.

Winters v. First Union Corp.

2001 NCBC 08 · North Carolina Business Court · Jul 13, 2001

Sutter v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E.2d 161 (1970). … HAJMM Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, 94 N.C.

State v. . Nipper

166 N.C. 272 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1914

These statutes clearly contemplate tbat tbe control and discipline of convicts and particularly in reference to their punishment, corporal or other, shall be pursuant to rules formally made and published by tbe board of county … Walker, J., and BrowN, J., concurring in this opinion.

Hammond v. City of Charlotte

206 N.C. 604 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1934

In the Elliott case, for $51,881.77; in the Brown case for $3,188.86, a total recovery of $90,102.88. In the Hammond case, supra, 205 N. … Umstead v. Board of Elections, 192 N. C., 139 (142).

Williams v. County Commissioners

176 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1918

Clark v. Statesville, 139 N. C., 490 ; Duke v. Brown, 96 N. C., 127 . … The power to order a new registration or to revise the “polling book” of voting precincts is conferred by the statute on the county board of elections.

Angel v. Ward

43 N.C. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1979

In Cline v. Brown, 24 N.C. … Ponder v. Cobb, supra; Ramsey v. Cheek, supra; Cline v. Brown, supra; 50 Am. Jur. 2d, Libel and Slander, § 219, pp. 730-31.

Town of Lumberton v. John Nuveen & Co.

144 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1907

The language of section 1 of the act gives to the commissioners a discretion as to the time of payment, subject to the thirty-year limit Bank v. Ayer, 24 Ind. App., 212 ; Catron v. County, 106 Mo., 659 ; Baker v. … Seattle, 2 Wash., 576 ; Turpin v. County, 48 S. W., 1085 ; Cullen v. Water Co., 113 Cal., 503 ; Manufacturing Co. v. Elizabeth, 42 N. J. Law, 249.

Farris v. . R. R.

151 N.C. 484 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1909

Bradley v. R. R. , 126 N.C. 735 ; Brown v. R. R. , 32 N.Y. 597 ; Falener v. R. R. , 68 Miss. 355 ; R. R. v. Summers , 68 Miss. 566 ; French v. R. R. , 116 Mass. 537 ; R. R. v. Garvey , 58 Ill. 83 ; R. R. v. … Crossing at this point enabled the employees to reach their homes and boarding places more quickly and to return to their work more promptly.

In re the Proposed Foreclosure of Claim of Lien

366 N.C. 252 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2012

See, e.g., James River Equip., Inc. v. Tharpe’s Excavating, Inc., 179 N.C. … See, e.g., Pue v. Hood, 222 N.C. 310, 313 , 22 S.E.2d 896, 898 (1942); Brown v. Woodrun Ass’n, 157 N.C.

R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.

169 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 24, 1915

Y.), 366; Summerville v. R. R. , 22 N.J. Law, 495 ; R. R. v. Board of Education , 32 Utah 305 ; Duke of Buccleuch v. Boards of Works , L. R. 5, H. L. 418; Comstock v. R. R. , 169 Pa., 287 ; Summerville v. … The Court also said, in Brown v.

Quail Valley Apartments Investors, LP v. Brown

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 6, 2020

See Merrell Dow Parm., Inc. v. … V.

Martinez v. Wake Cty. Bd. of Educ.

258 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 2018

FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ, Plaintiff v. WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. North Carolina Industrial Commission, I.C. No. TA-24792 EDUARDO FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ, Plaintiff v. … Stat. § 143- 300.1 is Huff v. Northampton County Board of Education, 259 N.C. 75, 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963).

Braswell v. Pamlico Insurance & Banking

159 N.C. 628 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 25, 1912

Solomon v. Bates, 118 N. C., 311 ; White v. Kincaid, 149 N. C., 415 . In furtherance of this allegation the plaintiffs offer to sub- . mit these'issues: 1. … Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U. S., 132 ; 3 Cook on Corporations, sec. 703; Solomon v. Bates, supra. The judgment' of the Superior Court is Affirmed.

Beck v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Florida

36 N.C. App. 218 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 1978

Oestreicher v. Stores, 290 N.C. 118 , 225 S.E. 2d 797 (1976); Rentals, Inc. v. Rentals, Inc., 26 N.C. App. 175 , 215 S.E. 2d 398 (1975).

Colt v. . Kimball

190 N.C. 169 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1925

Gin Co. , 119 Ga. 851 ); Illinois ( Cayne v. Avery , 189 Ill. 378 ); Iowa ( Holt v. Brown , 63 Iowa 319 ); Maryland ( Bagby v. Walker , 78 Md. 239 ); Michigan ( Bollenbacher v. … Reid , 155 Mich. 277 ); Minnesota ( Palmer v. Breen , 34 Minn. 39 ); Missouri ( Smith v. Shell , 82 Mo. 215 ); Nebraska ( McGinnis v. Johnson Co. , 74 Neb. 356 ); New York ( Browne v.

BURKE CTY. PUB. SCH. BD. OF EDUCATION v. Shaver Partnership

46 N.C. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

Setzer v. Annas, 286 N.C. 534 , 212 S.E. 2d 154 (1975). … Electric Co. v. Hospital Corp., 42 N.C.

Alvarez v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Edu.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 4, 2010

At all relevant times, Ray Jamal Dukes was an employee of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education and was operating a school bus owned by the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education within the course and scope of his … Bolkir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 (1988). The terms of the Tort Claims Act must be strictly construed. Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. DOT , 41 N.C.

Nichols v. . Edenton

125 N.C. 12 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1899

Action for $37.50, the salary of plaintiff as one of the board of councilmen of defendant. This amount is conceded, if plaintiff is entitled to recover. … This is his right and the board of councilmen are powerless to divest him of it by any resolution. Affirmed.

State v. . Williams

153 N.C. 595 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1910

Brown, J., after stating the case. … It is true that in People v. Mayer, 84 N. Y.