Case law

State ex rel. School District No. 2, T. 39, R. 28, St. Clair Co. v. Board of Education

64 Mo. 53 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1876

Clair county, *54 against the board of education of Appleton City, charging them with usurping control over the territory and local affairs of said district No. 2. … Board of Education of Appleton City, 58 Mo. 127 . The same question was again involved in the case of the State ex rel. vs. Heiser, 60 Mo. 540 .

State v. Collins

163 S.W.3d 614 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 2005

See State v. Valentine, 584 S.W.2d 92, 96-97 (Mo.banc 1979), overruled on other grounds by Sours v. State, 593 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Mo.banc 1980); Hamilton, 892 S.W.2d at 780-82 ; State v. … It was merely a comment as to Brown’s ability to assess Victim’s believability in the story related to Brown. Thus, the testimony was admissible. Tyra, 1 53 S.W.3d at 349; State v. Cone, 3 S.W.3d 833, 843 (Mo.App.1999).

State v. Baber

297 S.W.2d 439 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1956

According to Haynes, appellant struck Brown. He did not see Brown strike appellant and did not hear Brown make any threat. … State v. Slaten, Mo.Sup., 252 S.W.2d 330 [3] ; State v.

State v. Taylor

486 S.W.2d 239 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972

The contention that Cordell Brown was not available for cross-examination is answered by Allen v. St. … Brown when he was with the department, and by Mr. Stevens after Mr. Brown left. In State v.

Cupples Hesse Corporation v. State Tax Commission

329 S.W.2d 696 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1959

Louis located, generally, between Pen-rose Street and Brown Avenue, and fronting in part on Kingshighway. The land consists of approximately five acres and it is improved by substantial buildings. … The 1956 assessment on the land (as adjusted by the Board of Equalization) was $92,010, and on the improvements, $662,760.

State v. Lindsey

333 Mo. 139 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 1933

[State v. Johnson (Mo.), 234 S.W. 794 ; State v. Potts, 239 Mo. 403 , 144 S.W. 495 ; State v. Farr (Mo. App.), 255 S.W. 1069 .] … This court, in State v.

State v. Gill

167 S.W.3d 184 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 2005

Similarly, in State v. … Brown” shot Mr. Lape.

Stodghill v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES'INT'L UNION

13 F. Supp. 2d 960 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 29, 1998

Gurton v. Arons, 339 F.2d 371, 376 (2nd Cir.1964). … Although this action taints Stodghill's argument of the improper bias on the part of Trial Board members, it does not negate Local 50's duty to appoint an impartial Trial Board. [14] SEIU v.

Whitney v. Central Paper Stock Company

446 S.W.2d 415 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1969

In Reed v. … The test is that stated in Brown v.

State v. Davis

963 S.W.2d 317 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1997

State v. Bragg, 867 S.W.2d 284, 292 (Mo.App.1993); State v. Koster, 684 S.W.2d 488, 491 (Mo.App.1984); see also State v. Lopez, 836 S.W.2d 28, 34-35 (Mo.App.1992). … We refer, of course, to Batson v.

Ulrich v. City of St. Louis

112 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1892

Murtaugh v. City, 44 Mo. 479 ; Hannon v. St. Louis Co., 62 Mo. 313 ; Armstrong v. City, 79 Mo. 319 ; Kiley v. City, 87 Mo. 103 ; Carrington v. City, 89 Mo. 208 ; Keating v. … . *148 In Brown, Adm’r, v. Guyandotte, 11 Lawyers’ Rep.

State v. Hermann

117 Mo. 629 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1893

State v. … State v. Ellis, 74 Mo. 215 ; State v. Dieckmann, 75 Mo. 570 ; State v. Umfried, 76 Mo. 404 ; State v. Douglass, 81 Mo. 231 .

Knight Communications, Inc. v. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis

805 S.W.2d 199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1991

Brickner v. … Bank v. Kesterson, 257 Ark. 813 , 520 S.W.2d 253, 258 (1975). Florida: Burdine-Coakley v. Capital Bank, 542 So.2d 1019, 1020 (Fla.App.1989); Southern Contract Carpet, Inc. v.

State ex rel. Randolph County v. Evans

240 Mo. 95 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1912

[State ex rel. v. Wilson, 216 Mo. 301 ; Lingo v. Burford, 112 Mo. 149 ; Jeffries v. Wright, 51 Mo. 215 ; State v. Evans, 83 Mo. 319 ; Union Depot Co. v. Frederick, 117 Mo. 148 ; Light and Water Co. v. … J., Woodson and Ferriss, JJ., concur; Lamm, J., dissents; Brown, iT., dissents in opinion filed, in which Kennish, J., concurs.

Haas v. Director of Revenue

975 S.W.2d 483 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1998

Green v. Director of Revenue, 961 S.W.2d 936, 938 (Mo.App. E.D.1998); Section 302.505.1. These showings must be made by a preponderance of the evidence. Rogers v. Director of Revenue, 947 S.W.2d 475, 477 (Mo.App. … Sellenriek v. Director of Revenue, 826 S.W.2d 338, 340-41 (Mo. banc 1992). Brown then testified, without objection, that Driver’s breathalyzer test indicated his blood alcohol content was .191 percent.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Allen

744 S.W.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 17, 1988

See Greer v. … See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty and Surety Co., 477 S.W.2d 421 (Mo. banc 1972). *787 The trial judge could accept Brown’s testimony.

Jones v. State Highway Commission

557 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1977

Municipal University of Omaha, 184 Neb. 512 , 169 N.W.2d 286 (1969); Brown v. City of Omaha, 183 Neb. 430 , 160 N.W.2d 805 (1968); Rice v. Clark County, 79 Nev. 253 , 382 P.2d 605 (1963); Merrill v. … P.2d 1153 (1976); Kitto v. Minot Park Dist., 224 N.W.2d 795 (N.D.1974); Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A.2d 877 (1973); Becker v.

State v. Woolard

111 Mo. 248 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1892

State v. Harkins, 100 Mo. 666 ; State v. Jackson, 106 Mo. 174 . IY. The court should have given the defendant’s first instruction. If the jury should refuse to believe the witness, Alf. … Brown, the case is one largely of circumstantial evidence, and that instruction is proper and necessary. State v. Moxley, 102 Mo. 374 . For these errors the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

State of Missouri ex rel. Michael Lovelace, Relator v. Honorable Chris Kunza Mennemeyer, Judge of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2014

Upon successful completion of a treatment program, the board of probation and parole shall advise the sentencing court of an offender’s probationary release date thirty days prior to release. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006); Dorsey, 263 S.W.3d at 791.

Barber v. Hartford Life Insurance

269 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1916

BROWN, C. … The submission of the question of damages and attorney’s fees to the jury was proper under the rule stated by this court in Keller v. Home Insurance Co., 198 Mo. 440 , and Brown v.