Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.17s
244 S.W.2d 168 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1951
UNDERWOOD v. BROWN, Commissioner of Institutions, et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. July 27, 1951. On Petition to Rehear December 14, 1951. *169 Knox Bigham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error. Carl R. … Greenfield v. State, 66 Tenn. 18 ; Whitney v. State, 74 Tenn. 247 ; Dunn v. State, 127 Tenn. 267, 275 , 154 S.W. 969 ; McCall v. State, 167 Tenn. 329, 333 , 69 S.W.2d 892 . The Court said in Greenfield v.
Cited 1 timesPublished50 Tenn. 679 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1871
Brown was in the habit of watering his stock in the corn field; and sometimes when so turned in to water, and sometimes by jumping, some eight or ten head of Brown’s mules ran over and injured the crop. … In the case of Overton v. Phelan, 2 Head, 446 , Judge Yiright, after citing the cases of Porter v. Stacker, 3 Hum., 56 , and Whitaker v.
Cited 0 timesPublished41 Tenn. 456 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1860
In 1842, Allman was declared a bankrupt, and said house and lot were sold by the assignee in bankruptcy, and purchased by Walker & Edwards, who, in 1846, sold and conveyed the same by deed of quit claim, to the defendant Brown … Dill, proves expressly, that at a time subsequent to the purchase of the property by Brown, Allman told her, that he had paid for the property with money belonging to his wards.
Cited 0 timesPublished41 Tenn. 456 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1860
In 1842, Allman was declared a bankrupt, and said house and lot were sold by the assignee in bankruptcy, and purchased by Walker & Edwards, who, in 1846, sold and conveyed the same by deed of quit claim, to the defendant Brown … Dill, proves expressly, that at a time subsequent to the purchase of the property by Brown, Allman told her, that he had paid for the property with money belonging to his wards.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 Tenn. 180 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1858
Brown was a grocery keeper in the town of Mur-freesboro’, and being suspected of selling liquor to slaves, a plan was concerted for his detection. … The slave proceeded to the back door of the grocery, knocked, and was admitted by Brown, and immediately came out with the flask full of spirituous liquor.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 Tenn. 270 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1858
The two notes above-mentioned, executed by complainant to Thompson, were assigned to the defendant, Brown, before due, and without actual notice of any existing equity against ■ them, as between the original parties. … Upon the smaller note of the two, which was assigned to defendant, Brown, on the 23d of November, 1856, the latter had obtained judgment before a justice, to enjoin which this bill was filed.
Cited 0 timesPublished40 Tenn. 354 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1859
Brown, levied the same upon the slaves, Joe and Peter, as his property. … Brown’s children, and his wife, for their separate support and my son’s.”
Cited 0 timesPublished40 Tenn. 429 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1859
Evans v. Barnes, 2 Swan, 294 . … Evans v. Barnes, 2 Swan, 294 .
Cited 0 timesPublished40 Tenn. 671 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1859
In Pouste v. Stone, 14 Picking, 201, the question, is elaborately examined and discussed by C. J. … The case of Grover v. Grover, 24 Pick., 261 , draws the distinction between gifts interivos, and, causa mortis, and sustains the same, doctrine.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna