Case law

Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.

253 Or. App. 682 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 2012

); Kenimer v. … See Young v.

State v. Brown

219 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 2008

App. 545 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel Ray BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. 041493; A131624. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 27, 2008. Decided April 30, 2008. Eric R. … State v. Marshall, 219 Or.App. 511 , 183 P.3d 241 (2008).

Brown v. Crawford

252 F. 248 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 27, 1918

See, also, Railroad Co. v. Chamberlain, 6 Wall. 748 , 18 L. Ed. 859 , Freeman v. Howe et al., 24 How. 450 , 16 L. Ed. 749 , Osborne & Co. v. Barge (C. C.) 30 Fed. 805 , and Continental Trust Co. v. Toledo, St. L. & K. … DeWolf v. Johnson, 10 Wheat. 367 , 6 L. Ed. 343 ; Ringer v. Virgin Timber Co. (D. C.) 213 Fed. 1001 .

SAIF Corp. v. Brown

159 Or. App. 440 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 1999

In other words, for an order to be adequate for judicial review, we must be able to discern what the Board found as fact and why its findings led to its conclusions. Armstrong v. … Riley Hill General Contractor v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Brown

89 Or. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1987

Brown [husband], this is your opportunity to summarize any of the issues that— “[Husband]: May I call a witness please. “THE COURT: No. It’s already past time to call witnesses. “[Husband]: I wasn’t aware of that — .” … ORS 33.090; State v. Meyer, 31 Or App 775, 780 , 571 P2d 550 (1977); see State ex rel Hathaway v. Hart, 70 Or App 541, 545 , 690 P2d 514 (1984), aff’d 300 Or 231 (1985). Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

United States v. Brown

8 F.2d 630 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 9, 1925

A.] 299 F. 253 ; Nunn v. U. S. [C. C. A.] 4 F. [2d] 380; Thomas v. U. S. [C. C. … S., supra; Ludwig v. U. S. [C. C. A.] 3 F. [2d] 231; Malacrauis v. U. S. [C. C. A.] 299 F. 253 ; Byars v. U. S. [C. C. A.] 4 F.[2d] 507).

United States v. Brown

24 F. Cas. 1273 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 27, 1871

S. v. Reed [Case No. 16,134], and the authorities there cited, in which case a motion to quash upon a similar affidavit of the defendant was denied. … S. v. Ried, 12 How. [53 U.

State v. Brown

298 Or. App. 697 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 2019

State v. Armstrong , 52 Or. App. 161 , 628 P.2d 1206 , rev. den. , 291 Or. 662 , 639 P.2d 1280 (1981).

State v. L. BROWN

115 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

See State v. Walton, 311 Or 223, 240-41 , 809 P2d 81 (1991). Affirmed. 1 ORS 137.40 was also amended by Or Laws 1991, ch 630 and Or Laws 1991, ch 731.

Dillard v. Brown

297 Or. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2019

Dillard v. Premo , 296 Or. App. 798 , --- P.3d ---- (2019).

State v. Brown

245 Or. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 8, 2011

The trial court’s ruling was predicated on our decision in State v. Machuca, 231 Or App 232 , 218 P3d 145 (2009) (Machuca I). … State v. Machuca, 347 Or 644, 657 , 227 P3d 729 (2010) (Machuca II) (emphasis in original). This case is materially indistinguishable from Machuca.

Merrill v. Johnson

155 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1998

The issue that plaintiff raises is the same as the issue decided by this court in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12 , 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 17, 1998.

State v. Brown

240 Or. App. 313 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

On appeal, defendant contends that, under State v. … Reversed and remanded. 1 The trial court’s admission of the disputed evidence was predicated, in part, on our disposition in State v.

State v. PERKINS-BROWN

245 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 2011

App. 165 STATE v. PERKINS-BROWN. No. A143203 Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 17, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. Washington County

163 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1999

No warrant was issued until Mazikowski requested a warrant from the Parole Board on February 17, seven days after Brown’s escape. … Greist v.

Nelson v. Brown & McCabe

81 Or. 472 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1916

The authorities on this subject are collated in Marks v. Columbia County Lumber Co., 77 Or. 22 ( 149 Pac. 1041 ). *476 3.

Sing On v. Brown

44 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1903

The *13 settlement alone constitutes a sufficient consideration to uphold the compromise or contract: Smith v. Farra, 21 Or. 395 ( 28 Pac. 241 , 20 L. R. A. 115); McGlynn v. Scott, 4 N. D. 18 ( 58 N. W. 460 ). … Brown.

Snyder v. ESPINO-BROWN

349 Or. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

243 P.3d 69 (2010) 349 Or. 171 SNYDER v. ESPINO-BROWN. (S058520). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 7, 2010. Petition for review allowed.

Brown v. Employment Dept.

237 Or. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

App. 575 BROWN v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT. A143365 Court of Appeals of Oregon. September 29, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

HOEPER-BROWN v. Howton

235 Or. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 2010

App. 380 HOEPER-BROWN v. HOWTON. A142683. Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 26, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.