Case law

Brown v. State

7 Okla. Crim. 738 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1912

The appellant, Charles Brown, was convicted in the county court of Canadian county at the July, 1911, term for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of five hundred dollars and

Brown v. State

5 Okla. Crim. 666 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1911

Guthrie v. Brown

130 Okla. 87 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1928

Brown, O, H. Toalson, and H. B. Rodecker, wbo were, on July 4, 1924, county commissioners of Washington county, and W. F. … The separate demurrers of Brown, Toalson, Rodecker, and Froebe were sustained, and that of the Road Surfacing Company was overruled.

Brown v. Taliaferro

161 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1933

Brown v. State

21 Okla. Crim. 26 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1922

Brown, was- convicted on a charge of grand larceny, and was sentenced to be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a term of two years. … V. Pendergrass. The evidence for the state to support the allegations of the information is undisputed. The information is sufficient, and the Instructions of the court fully cover the law of the case.

Brown v. State

52 Okla. Crim. 92 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1931

Brown v. State

11 Okla. Crim. 699 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1915

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an information whch jointly charged that Link Brown and Mrs. Link Brown did unlawfully sell whisky to Zack Triet. The jury failed to fix the punishment. … Link Brown to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars.

Brown v. State

29 Okla. Crim. 195 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1925

The information in this case charges that Eva Napier and Arrilla Brown did commit the crime of conjoint robbery, while armed with a deadly weapon, by taking from the person of one Iva Stallans some $45. … The record shows that the complaining witness in his testimony fully identified the defendant, Arrilla Brown, as one of two women who stopped him and one W. H.

Davis v. Brown

163 Okla. 7 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1933

Brown obtained a judgment upon a promissory note for $2,-900, on April 25, 1930, and foreclosure of a mortgage was ordered therein. December 18, 1930, plaintiff in error filed petition to vacate judgment.

Brown v. State

45 Okla. Crim. 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 23, 1929

Neither *236 of the'officers claim to have seen the defendant William Brown in the building, nor about any of the rooms, at the time they made the search. … Watson v. State, 44 Okla. Cr. 108 , 279 Pac. 934 , and cases cited therein.

Brown v. Jimerson

64 O.B.A.J. 3379 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1993

Citing Reynolds v. … In Korth v.

French v. Brown

73 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1918

Brown and Mrs.' M. C. … First State Bank of Mannsville v. Howell et al. 41 Okla. 216 , 137 Pac. 657 ; Williams v. Gibson, 60 Okla. 147 , 159 Pac. 649 .

Starnes v. Brown

155 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

Fidelity & Guaranty Company did not get sufficient notice, and further complain that Brown was not an employee of Starnes at the time of the injury, but was employed by a Mr. McPeek. … J., CLARK, V. O. J.. and HEENER, OULLISON, .SWINDALL, .and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. RILE)?, J., concurs in conclusions. McNEILL, J., absent.

Brown Bros. v. Parks

176 Okla. 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1936

In Brown Bros. v. … Bros. v.

Turner v. Brown

197 Okla. 638 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1946

The trial court’s judgment reads in part: “That the V-8 Ford combination ambulance and hearse is exempt . . . for the reason that it is an ‘apparatus’ of the profession of the owner, Jesse Brown, who is a professional undertaker … . . . that the Ford V-8 automobile hearse and combination ambulance be . . . discharged from said execution levy, as exempt property, ...”

Brown v. West

28 Okla. 648 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1911

Election Board v. Elliott, 26 Okla. 546 , 109 Pac. 731 ; Miller et al. v. Ury, 23 Okla. 546 , 102 Pac. 112 . The petition is dismissed. All the Justices concur.

Brown v. State

503 P.2d 571 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1972

vacated the opinion of this Court, Okl.Cr., 492 P.2d 1106 , affirming the judgment and sentence rendered in the above styled and numbered cause, and remanded this cause for reconsideration of this Court in the light of Cohen v. … California, 403 U.S. 15 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed. 2d 284 (1971) and Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U.S. 518 , 92 S.Ct. 1103 , 31 L.Ed.2d 408 (1972).

Brown v. Savage

78 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1920

Brown and M. … Brown and M.

Brown v. Van Pelt

64 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1917

Brown, W. H. Brown, and Rhoda Yarhola, as defendants. … Sussex v. Worth, Cro. Eliz. pt. 1, p. 5; Shecomb v. Hawkins, Cro. Jac. 318, Velv. 222; Winter v. Loveday, 1 Comyns Rep. 37; Sugden, Powers, p. 749 ; 4 Greenlief’s Cruise’s Dig. 165, 166; Taussig v.

Caruso v. Brown

686 P.2d 996 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 1984

Brown, Jr., D.P.M., is a podiatrist working for defendant Mid-Del Podiatry, Inc. … Redwine v. Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma, Inc., 679 P.2d 1293 (Okla.1983).