Case law

Slaughter v. Brown

16 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 19, 1935

In McClaine v. … Van Hook v. Whitlock, 3 Paige (N.Y.) 409; Salisbury v. Black’s Adm’r, 6 Har. & J. (Md.) 293 [14 Am.Dec. 279]; Sinkler v. Turnpike Company, 3 Pen. & W.(Pa.) 149; Walter v. Walter, 1 Whart.(Pa.) 292; Quigg v.

Zane v. Brown

126 N.J. Eq. 200 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Sep 28, 1939

Brown recovered against it. Cf. Corson v. Bailey, 98 N.J. Eq. 323 . Nor does the alleged insolvency of Mr. Brown alter this disposition of the matter. Trotter v. Heckscher, 40 N.J. … Tate v. Security Trust Co., 63 N.J. Eq. 559 ; Sipley v. Wass, 49 N.J. Eq. 463 ; George F. Perry Sons, Inc., v. Mand, 110 N.J. Eq. 111 .

Brown v. Gaskill

74 N.J. Eq. 620 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 9, 1908

Leaming, V. C.

Cox v. Brown

87 N.J. Eq. 462 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jun 15, 1917

Lu tjen v. Lutjen, 64 N. J. … In Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Co., 94 U.

Brady v. Board of Review

152 N.J. 197 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1997

Charatan v. Board of Review, 200 N.J.Super. 74, 79 , 490 A.2d 352 (App.Div.1985) (citations omitted); see also Greenwood v. … Products Co. v. Board of Review, 106 N.J.Super. 6, 9 , 254 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1969); Zielenski v. Board of Review, 85 N.J.Super. 46, 52 , 203 A.2d 635 (App.Div.1964).

Warren County Vocational Technical School v. Brown & Brown

932 A.2d 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 2007

932 A.2d 28 (2007) WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL v. BROWN & BROWN. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 7, 2007. Petition for certification Denied.

Brown v. Garcia

171 N.J. 332 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 14, 2001

State v. Brown

82 N.J.L. 164 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1912

The proofs showed that the defendant had been granted a wholesale liquor license by the excise board of the city of Burlington, authorizing him to carry on business under that license at bios. 30 and 32 Delaware avenue, in … Those which were accepted were filled from the common stock in Brown’s place of business, and marked with the name and address of the buyer; some of the packages so marked were then delivered by Brown’s own wagon and driver

Brown v. Terhune

127 N.J.L. 554 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1942

Cluzel v. Brown

133 N.J. Eq. 156 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1943

Mott v. Mott, supra; In re Fulper, 99 N. J. Eq. 293. As was said by Mr. Justice Heher for the Court of Errors and Appeals in Peppler v. Roffe, supra, “In invoking the general rule applied in Bankers Trust Co. v. … The facts in the instant case parallel those in Peppler v. Roffe, supra. This court in Croker v. Clegg, 123 N. J. Eq. 332 (at p. 335), adopted the language used in Cowee v. Cornell, 75 N.

Jacoby v. Brown

55 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1959

JACOBY, PLAINTIFF, v. ROBERT L. BROWN, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided May 7, 1959. *470 Mr. Nathaniel A. Jacoby, attorney pro se. Mr. John M. Kolibas, attorney for defendant. … This court is of the opinion that the defendant Brown's term, as a matter of law, would not have expired until April 16, 1956, but that the action of the defendant Brown *474 in relinquishing his position as magistrate on

Brown v. Howell

68 N.J.L. 292 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1902

This is the action which was before' the Supreme Court on demurrer in Brown v. Howell, 37 Vroom 25 . … Ilaines v. Price, Spenc. 480; Southard v. Potts, 2 Zab. 278. But beyond this, courts of law do not attempt to give effect to the enactment in personal actions. Thus in Von Arx v.

Brown v. Kelly

42 N.J. 362 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 1, 1964

Sewall v. Fox, 98 N. J. L. 819 (E. & A. 1923); Zemetra v. Fenchel Realty Co., Inc., 134 N. J. L. 358 (Sup. Ct. 1946), affirmed o. b. 135 N. J. L. 205 (E. & A. 1947); Annotation, 82 A. L. R. 2d 998 (1962). … Sewall v. Fox, supra; Taggart v. Bouldin, 111 N. J. L. 464 (E. & A. 1933); Stevenson, “Law of Streets and Sidewalks in New Jersey,” 3 Rutgers L. Rev. 19 , 25 (1949).

Marten v. Brown

80 N.J.L. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1910

Hasbrouck v. Winkler, 19 Vroom 431 ; Watts v. Frenche, 4 C. E. Gr. 407. But that rule has no application to this ease. … Aschenberg v. Mundy, 47 Vroom 352 .

Brown v. Kremer

124 N.J.L. 242 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1940

Guild, 114 Id. 472; Brown v. Paterson Central Market Association, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 1035; Craig v. Morgenweck, 15 Id. 637); neither is the payment of compensation by commissions rather than by fixed salary. Dunbaden v. … The Court of Errors and Appeals, in Giroud v.

Brown v. Rowland

141 N.J. Eq. 358 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1948

Brown v. Christian

97 N.J.L. 56 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1922

Obart v. Letson, 17 N. J. L. 78. The Attachment act is different from the act relating to trials to determine the ownership of property seized under writs of execution. Under the Attachment act (Comp.

Brown v. Hendrickson

39 N.J.L. 239 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1877

. & P. 28; Bourne v. Benett, 4 Bing. 423; Schoole v. Noble, 1 H. Bl. 23; O’Connor v. Murphy, Id. 657. The same rule prevails in New York. Cooper v. Bigalow, 1 Cowen 206; Miller v. Gilman, 7 Id. 469; Kimball v. … The fact that the judgment was assigned to Brown does not defeat the application of the rule. Miller v. Gilman, 7 Cowen 469; Cooper v. Bigalow, 1 Id. 206.

Brown v. Healey

80 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1963

BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH M. HEALEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 17, 1963. … McDonough v. Roach, 35 N.J. 153, 155 (1961). And see Ahto v. Weaver, 39 N.J. 418 (1963).

Brown v. Coxson

119 N.J. Eq. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 9, 1935