Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.76s
32 Mass. 151 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1833
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Mass. 275 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1841
. * As this case formerly was presented to the court, it appeared to us that there was a breach of the contract on the part of the master, Brown, one of the plaintiffs, in not filling up the entire eleven twelfths of the … And although in the event that happened, it was fortunate for the defendants that it was not en tirely filled up, yet if the plaintiff Brown, with whom the other plaintiff was connected, by a plain breach of the agreement
Cited 0 timesPublished35 Mass. 549 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 10, 1836
Cited 0 timesPublished24 Mass. App. Ct. 979 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Sep 28, 1987
Commonwealth v. Gallison, 383 Mass. 659, 672 (1981), quoting from Commonwealth v. Beneficial Fin. Co., 360 Mass. 188, 221 (1971), cert. denied sub nom. Farrell v. Massachusetts, 407 U.S. 910 , and Beneficial Fin. Co. v. … See Commonwealth v. Palmariello, 392 Mass. 126, 134 (1984); Commonwealth v. Kozec, 399 Mass. 514, 521 (1987); Commonwealth v. Lowe, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 262, 267 (1983); Commonwealth v. Modica, 24 Mass. App.
Cited 3 timesPublished22 Mass. 170 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1827
See Cushing v. Hurd, 4 Pick. 253 . 1 This is now made a part of the duty of the officer, by Revised Stat c 73, § 17. … Emerson v. Towle, 5 Greenl. 197; Welsh v. Joy, 13 Pick. 481 . See Revised Stat. c. 73, § 18; M'Mechan v. Griffin, 3 Pick. (2d ed ) 154 157, notes, and cases there collected.
Cited 0 timesPublished78 Mass. 355 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1859
Cited 0 timesPublished75 Mass. 84 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1857
Cited 0 timesPublished53 Mass. 501 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1847
The party seeking to be admitted to prosecute this petition, and to obtain judgment of partition thereon, is the widow and sole devisee of Amos Brown, deceased, who originally filed the petition. … The court are therefore of opinion that the party, here applying to be admitted to appear and prosecute the petition of Amos Brown/or partition, is not authorized by law so to do. Exceptions overruled.
Cited 0 timesPublished53 Mass. 522 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1847
Cited 0 timesPublished78 Mass. 102 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1858
Cited 0 timesPublished93 Mass. 226 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1865
Cited 0 timesPublished31 Mass. 177 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1833
In Hill v. … And, that the plaintiff would have been allowed in that case to show that no new demand had been proved before the referees, nor allowed by them, appears quite- clear by a note in the case of Willis v.
Cited 0 timesPublished89 Mass. 507 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1863
In Boyce v. … In Moore v. Adam, 2 Chit.
Cited 0 timesPublished66 Mass. 366 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1853
Cited 0 timesPublished64 Mass. 262 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1852
Perley v. Balch, 23 Pick. 283 . Evidence on this point was competent under the general issue. 1 Chit. Pl. (6th Am. ed.) 600.
Cited 0 timesPublished59 Allen 289 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1850
that William and Josiah Brown had at the time of their decease. … But, in the deed of Farrington to the Browns, the sea-wall is not mentioned.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 Mass. 572 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1824
J. said the question was settled in the preceding case of Miller v. Miller, and the exceptions were sustained.1 See Miller v. Miller, ante, 570; Howe’s Pract. 454.
Cited 0 timesPublished22 Mass. App. Ct. 992 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Aug 25, 1986
The plaintiff is barred from recovery under the reasoning of Cyr v. Farias, 367 Mass. 720, 722-723 (1975), in which the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that the limitations of G. … The Supreme Judicial Court came to a different conclusion in Murphy v.
Cited 2 timesPublished22 Mass. 519 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1827
Cited 1 timesPublished76 Mass. 92 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1857
Co. v. Winslow, 3 Gray, 415 . The language of the Rev. Sts. c. 99, § 19, clearly embraces a case of this kind.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna