Case law

State v. Ingram

237 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1953

S. v. Davis, 23 N.C. 125 ; S. v. Hampton, 63 N.C. 13 ; S. v. Horne, 92 N.C. 805 ; S. v. Jeffreys, 117 N.C. 743 , 23 S.E. 175 ; S. v. Daniel, 136 N.C. 571 , 48 S.E. 544 ; Humphries v. … In S. v.

VR Sys., Inc. v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections & Ethics Enforcement

816 S.E.2d 537 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2018

NC State Bd. of Educ. v. State

806 S.E.2d 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 2017

Lea v. . Lea

104 N.C. 603 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1889

It was decided in Taylor v. … It is the case of Johnson v. Kincade, 2 Ired. Eq., 470 . There the marriage was declared a nullity because of the mental incapacity of the plaintiff.

Clark v. Meyland

261 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 19, 1964

Westerman v. Mims, 111 Tex. 29 , 227 S.W. 178 ; Ray v. Garner, 257 Ala. 168 , 57 S.E. 2d 824 ; Chapman v. King, 154 Fed. 2d 460 (5th Ct. denied), 327 U.S. 800 ; State v. Michel, 121 La. 374 . … Banks v. Raleigh, 220 N.C. 35 , 16 S.E. 2d 413 . And, as stated in Starbuck v.

Town of Old Fort v. Harmon

219 N.C. 241 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941

Hudson v. McArthur, 152 N. C., 445 , 67 S. E., 995 ; Hipp v. Ferrall, 173 N. C., 167 , 91 S. E., 831 . … Ellis v. Brown, 217 N. C., 787 , 9 S. E. (2d), 467 . Tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court sustaining tbe demurrer filed is Affirmed.

Thompson v. . Shepherd

203 N.C. 310 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1932

Brown, 201 N. C., at p. 24. It will be noted that the vice is when the transaction affects preexisting liabilities. … Brown Shepherd, openly and fairly made, and for an adequate consideration?” To which the jury responded in the affirmative — Yes. In Hospital v. Nicholson, 189 N.

Buckner v. . Maynard

198 N.C. 802 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1930

We think the cases of King v. Stokes, 125 N. C., 514 ; Acker v. Pridgen, 158 N. C., 337 , and Puckett v. Morgan, 158 N. C., 344 , are more controlling than the Harrington case, supra. … In Ellington v. Trust Company, 196 N.

Ellison v. Alexander

207 N.C. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 2010

Brown v. Centex Homes, 171 N.C. App. 741, 744 , 615 S.E.2d 86, 88 (2005) (citing Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 108 N.C. App. 268, 271 , 423 S.E.2d 791, 794 (1992)). … In Brown , plaintiffs sued a real estate agent, and the firm by which she was employed, based on statements made by the agent prior to plaintiffs’ purchase of property. Brown, 171 N.C.

Brown v. N.C. Department of Adult Correction

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 4, 2024

On November 20, 2023, Brown filed this action. IL. medion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) tests the complaint’s legal and factual sufficiency. See Ashcroft v. … See, e.g., Israelitt v. Enter. Servs. LLC, 78 F.4th 647, 653 (4th Cir. 2023); Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Off. of the Cts., 780 F.3d 562, 577 (4th Cir. 2015); Rhoads v.

Crockett Capital Corp. v. Inland Am. Winston Hotels, Inc.

2011 NCBC 6 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 28, 2011

(Dep. of John Brown (“Brown Dep.”) at 618:14−621:11.) … First Union Nat’l Bank v. Brown, 166 N.C. App. 519, 534, 603 S.E.2d 808, 819 (2004). Inland’s suit concerning Mr.

Brown v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 2025

Plaintiff, v. … Goodman v. Diggs, 986 F.3d 493, 498 (4th Cir. 2021) (citing Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 572 (4th Cir. 2001)). In light of Plaintiffs filing,!

In Re Will of Thorp

150 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1909

Brown, J. … To the Board of Directors of the Eastern Hospital.

State Ex Rel. Gatling v. Boone

101 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

Were the reasons for excluding the returns which determined the conduct of the canvassing board sufficient to warrant their exclusion at the present trial ? … Such was the action of the Court, under similar circumstances of irreconcilable findings of the jury in Mitchell v. Brown, 88 N. C., 156 , and this is a proper precedent.

Hollowell v. . Borden

148 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1908

BrowN, J. … Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 151 .

State v. . Potts

75 N.C. 129 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

The Attorney General relies on the State v. Outlaw, 72 N. C. Rep., 598 . … That case can only be distinguished from the present by the fact that Harriss (the person who slept in Cunningham’s store) was a clerk of Cunningham and *131 boarded in his family.

Dugger v. . McKesson

100 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

Caldwell v. Neely, 81 N. C., 114 ; Huffman v. Walker, 83 N. C., 411 ; Strickland v. Draughn, 88 N. … State v. Efler, 85 N. C., 585 ; State v. Pratt, 88 N. C., 639 .

Taylor v. Conagra Foods, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 2, 2011

Stat. § 97-29 ; Russell v. Lowe's Product Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). 4. … Stat. § 97-42 ; Moretz v. Richards Assoc. , 74 N.C. App. 72 , 327 S.E.2d 290 (1985), modified on other grounds , 316 N.C. 539 , 342 S.E.2d 844 (1986). 9.

Borden, Inc. v. Wade

21 N.C. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1974

Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390 , 180 S.E. 2d 297 . … Page v. Sloan, 281 N.C. 697 , 190 S.E. 2d 189 . The judgment entered allowing plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is reversed. Reversed. Judge Britt concurs. Judge Campbell dissents.

Griffin v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2025

Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742, 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 514 (1983). A probability of an irregularity in the conduct of the election is sufficient. See Adams v. City of Raleigh, 245 N.C. … App. at 570, 264 S.E.2d at 345-46 (citations omitted); In re Brown, 56 N.C.