Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.48s
554 S.W.3d 343 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2018
Roe v. … Wells v.
Cited 41 timesPublished321 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 8, 1970
Cited 0 timesPublished372 S.W.2d 860 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 11, 1963
Defendant cites State v. … See also 1 Raymond Missouri Instructions 62, and cases cited, Sec. 69; State v. Wakefield, 73 Mo. 549 ; State v. Bunyard, 253 Mo. 347 , 161 S.W. 756 ; State v. Baird, 271 Mo. 9 , 195 S.W. 1010 ; State v. Daegele, Mo.
Cited 20 timesPublished228 Mo. 413 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1910
[State v. Brown, 8 Nev. 208 ; 22 Cyc. 333.] Learned counsel for the State say this last clause in the indictment can be ignored and treated as surplusage and if omitted there is still a valid charge. … [State v. Johnston, 6 Jones Law (N. C.) 485; John v. State, 24 Miss. 569 ; Com. v. Harley, 7 Met. 506 ; State v. Copp, 15 N. H. 212; Com. v. Luscomb, 130 Mass. 42 ; U. S. v. Porter, 3 Day 283 .]
Cited 9 timesPublished57 Mo. App. 507 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1894
Pla ttsburg v. Riley, 42 Mo. App. 18 ; City of Kansas v. Cooh, 38 Mo. App. 660 ; Chillicothe v. Brown, 38 Mo. App. 610 ; Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 72 Mo. 220 ; Corrigan v. Gage, 68 Mo. 541 ; St. Louis v. … Louis v. Griswold, 58 Mo. 192 ; State v. Able, 65 Mo. 357 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. Thomas v. Board of Aldermen of the City of Rock Port
584 S.W.2d 171 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1979
All applications for such licenses shall be passed on by the Board, and on approval of an application, the Board shall instruct the city clerk to issue said license on payment of the required fee.” … Sprague v. City of St. Joseph, 549 S.W.2d 873 (Mo. banc 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished11 Mo. 230 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1847
The plaintiff then read Sparr’s receipt for $5, for one week’s board.— The plaintiff then offered himself as a witness to prove the particular articles of which he had been robbed. … Hunt, 2 Cow., 436 ; Brown vs. May, 1 Munf., 291 . A different practice seems to have prevailed here. In Pavy & Orr vs.
Cited 18 timesPublished332 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1932
Mo. 146; Browning v. Ry., 284 Mo. 439 , 224 S. W. 748 ; and Ice Co. v. Tamm, 138 Mo. 385 , 39 S. W. 791 . … Dec. 688 ; State v. Schilling, 14 Iowa, 455, 459 ; Robinson v. Brown et al., 82 Ill. 279, 281 ), and such may be accepted by the court as establishing their own existence. [23 C. J. 110, n. 97, and cases cited.]
Cited 31 timesPublishedNolan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
250 Mo. 602 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913
[Cobb v. Railroad, 149 Mo. 135, 144 ; Milliken v. Commission Co., 202 Mo. 637, 654-5 ; Thomasson v. Insurance Co., 217 Mo. 485, 497 .] … [Spencer v. Transit Co., 111 Mo. App. 653 ; Eikenberry v. Transit Co., 103 Mo. App. 442 .]
Cited 6 timesPublished840 S.W.2d 219 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 27, 1992
Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1395 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979). The issue Hyland raises reaches in two directions. … State v. Lytle, 715 S.W.2d 910, 915 (Mo. banc 1986). Having carefully considered the record, we find ample evidence to support the trial court’s ruling.
Cited 49 timesPublishedJohnson v. United Railways Co.
227 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1910
“A court of equity ... is never active in relief against conscience or public con venience[Lord Camden in Smith v. Clay, see 3 Brown’s Chan. R., note *p. 640.] … J., in Mayor v. Comrs., 7 Barr l. c. 366).
Cited 24 timesPublishedWashington v. LADUE SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDUC.
564 F. Supp. 2d 1059 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 30, 2008
564 F.Supp.2d 1059 (2008) Leondre WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. LADUE SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. No. 4:08CV21 HEA. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. … See, e.g., Cleveland Board of Education v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGalemore v. Mid-West National Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.
443 S.W.2d 194 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1969
Vetter v. Browne, 231 Mo.App. 1147 , 85 S.W.2d 197 (1). Cf. Melugin v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. of Omaha, Neb., Mo.App., 344 S.W.2d 144, 148 (6); Crawford v. General Exchange Ins. … Bain, 46 Mo.App. 581, 592 (6); Poplin v. Brown, 200 Mo.App. 255, 265 , 205 S.W. 411, 414 ; T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. Stamp, Mo.App., 7 S.W.2d 407 , 409 (2). 8 .
Cited 15 timesPublished254 Mo. 293 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 3, 1914
In Minter v. … In State v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States v. School District
399 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 11, 1975
Wall v. Stanley County Board of Education, 378 F.2d 275 , 276 (4th Cir. 1967); United States v. Chesterfield County School District, 484 F.2d 70, 73 (4th Cir. 1973); Cf., Brown v. … Brooks, supra; Wall, supra; Chambers v. Hendersonville Board of Education, 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1966) ; United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublished224 Mo. App. 178 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1929
[Brown v. Carrollton, 122 Mo. App. 276, 281 .] … Co. v. Kansas City, 13 S.
Cited 7 timesPublished591 S.W.2d 21 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1979
State v. Hale, 371 S.W.2d 249 (Mo.1963); State v. … State v. Francis, 544 S.W.2d 306, 312 (Mo.App.1976). There was no abuse of discretion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCass County v. Mercantile Town Mutual Insurance
188 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1905
Brown, 68 Mo. App. 630 ; City of Goodland v. Bank, 74 Mo. App. 365 .] In Lysaght v. Association, 55 Mo. … [Bank v. Bank, 10 Mo. 123 ; Ragan v. McElroy; 98 Mo. 349 ; Bank v. Porter, 52 Mo. App. 244 ; Society v. Branch, 120 Mo. 226 ; Bank v. Hunt, 7 Mo. App. 42 .]
Cited 26 timesPublishedState ex rel. Karsch v. Camden County
302 S.W.3d 754 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 2010
“An appellate court reviews the findings and conclusions of the [Board] and not the judgment of the trial court.” State ex rel. Teefey v. … As previously related, this Court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board and we give the Board’s decision “the benefit of all reasonable inferences.” State ex rel. Dotson v. Cty.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCotton Lumber Co. v. La Crosse Lumber Co.
200 Mo. App. 7 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1918
The barn boards he furnished were number 3 two grades below what I figured and the boards are rotten, have rotten streaks full length that I showed William I could poke my lead pencil through. … [See Brown v. Knapp & Co., 213 Mo. 655 , l. c. 697, 112 S. W. 474 ; Brown v. Globe Ptg. Co., 213 Mo. 611, 653, 654 .] These assignments of error are therefore ruled against appellant.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna