Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • Grier v. Specialized Skills, Inc.

    326 F. Supp. 856 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 1971

    The regulatory scheme is administered by the State Board of Barber Examiners. There is no Negro on the State Board, nor has there ever been. … See, e. g., Rackley v. Board of Trustees of Orangeburg Regional Hospital, 310 F.2d 141, 143 (4th Cir., 1962); Cypress v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Clark v. . Woolen Mills

    204 N.C. 529 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1933

    Kenan v. Motor Co., 203 N. C., at p. 110; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 ; Richey v. Cotton Mills, 203 N. C., 595 ; Massey v. Board of Education, ante, 193, 196. … Brown v. Ice Co., 203 N. C., 97 ; Johnson v. Bagging Co., 203 N. C., 579 . The Industrial Commission said: “This is a very interesting case. It has given the trial Commissioner much concern.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • HILL CONDOMINIUM I ASS'N. v. Colony Co.

    325 S.E.2d 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1985

    325 S.E.2d 485 (1985) COLONY HILL CONDOMINIUM I ASSOCIATION, Colony Hill Condominium I, Board of Directors of Colony Hill Condominium I Association, Larry Ferrell, Jennie B. … Brown, Donald P. Vandayburg, Dorothy Vandayburg, U.S. Fire Insurance Company, Crum & Forster Insurance Group, Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance Company, North River Insurance Company v. COLONY COMPANY, A Partnership; Fred J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. Condra

    2009 NCBC 21 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 14, 2009

    Green v. Condra, 2009 NCBC 21. … Brown Law LLP by Gregory W. Brown and Joshua M. Hiller for Defendants. Diaz, Judge.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kerik v. Davidson County

    145 N.C. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

    Sink; Jeff Cecil; Billy Joe Kepley; Brown Loftin; Fred D. McClure; Larry W. Potts; D. Reid Sink, Jr., Members of the Board of Commissioners of Davidson County, Defendants. No. COA00-660. … Sherrill v. Town of Wrightsville Beach, 81 N.C.App. 369, 373 , 344 S.E.2d 357, 360 (1986); see also Brown v. Town of Davidson, 113 N.C.App. 553, 556 , 439 S.E.2d 206, 208 (1994).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Miller v. North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors

    322 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1988

    The Board’s decision reprimanded petitioner and suspended his license. … The Notice of Action Without Hearing sent to petitioner by the Board informed petitioner that the Board’s “intended action” was a reprimand and fine.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sprunt v. . Comrs. of New Hanover

    208 N.C. 695 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

    Watkins et al., Board of County Commissioners, and Royster et al., Board of Elections of Vance County, ante , 675, the general provisions of the two statutes are to the same effect, and the pleadings in the two cases are … George v. Hardie , 147 N.C. 88 (97). Affirmed on plaintiffs' appeal. Error on defendants' appeal.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Blanchard

    175 F. Supp. 3d 581 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 2016

    Id. at *7-8 (citing Brown v. Walker, 188 N.C. 52, 58 , 123 S.E. 633, 636 (1924)); Fowler v. … Similarly, the seminal case, Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Guy v. Commissioners of Cumberland County

    122 N.C. 471 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1898

    State v. Muse, 20 N. C., 319 ; State v. Joyner, 81 N. C., 534 ; State v. Stovall, 103 N. C., 416 ; State v. Barringer, 110 N. C., 525 ; State v. Snow, 117 N. … Justice Brown has replied very conclusively in Scott v. Donald, 165 U.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Blohm v. Dillard's Inc.

    95 F. Supp. 2d 473 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 6, 2000

    See also Thorson v. Gemini, Inc., 205 F.3d 370 , 378 (8th Cir.2000); Robinson v. Overnite Transportation Co., 110 F.3d 60 , 1997 WL 165416, *7 (4th Cir. … Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be allowed insofar as it seeks the dismissal of plaintiffs retaliatory discharge claim against defendant Brown. Defendant Brown will be dismissed from the action. V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

    830 S.E.2d 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Drainage Commissioners of Parkville Drainage District, No. 1 v. Brett Engineering Co.

    165 N.C. 37 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1914

    Again, the amendatory act of 1911, secs. 9 and 10, provide that— “In. case the total cost exceeds an average of 25 cents per acre on all lands in the district, the board of drainage commissioners shall give notice for three … bonds may, within fifteen days after the publication of said notice, pay to the county treasurer the full amount for which his land is liable, to be ascertained- from the classification sheet and the certificate of the board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vass v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' & State Employees' Comprehensive Major Medical Plan

    89 N.C. App. 333 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1988

    Board to pay for coverage of radial keratotomy surgery.” … “Agency” is defined as “any agency, institution, board ... or officer of the State government.” G.S. 150B-2G).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Nash County General Hospital

    1 N.C. App. 33 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1968

    Board of Education, 233 N.C. 400 , 64 S.E. 2d 403 ; Reed v. Highway Commission, 209 N.C. 648 , 184 S.E. 513 ; McInnish v. Board of Education, 187 N.C. 494 , 122 S.E. 182 ; and Lee v. … Kistler v. Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

    827 S.E.2d 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 22, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Huskins v. Yancey Hospital

    238 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1953

    Branch v. Board of Education, supra; 28 Am.Jur., Injunctions, section 268. … Bank, 200 N.C. 441 , 157 S.E. 419 ; Cullins v. North Carolina State College, 198 N.C. 337 , 151 S.E. 646 ; Norfolk So. R. R. v. Rapid Transit Co., 195, N.C. 305, 141 S.E. 882 ; Brown v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC Durham Corp.

    123 N.C. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1996

    Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989). After reviewing the record, we find there are grounds to sustain the granting of summary judgment and affirm. I. … Property Owners’ Assoc. v. Current and Property Owners’ Assoc. v. Moore, 35 N.C. App. 135, 136 , 240 S.E.2d 503, 505 (1978).

    Reversed by Richland Run Homeowners Ass'n v. CHC Durham Corp., 346 N.C. 170 (1997)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cohn v. Wilkes General Hospital

    767 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 12, 1991

    Sandcrest Outpatient Services, P.A. v. Cumberland County Hospital, 853 F.2d 1139 (4th Cir.1988). … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350-51 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 313-14 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). This doctrine applies to a municipality when its actions are authorized by state law. Hallie v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Aldridge v. Foil Motor Company

    262 N.C. 248 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1964

    In Burnett v. … Smith Coal Co. v. Feltner, Ky., 260 S.W. 2d 398 . In Brown v. Bouschor, 207 Mich. 594 , 175 N.W. 129 , B was a subcontractor of C Lumber Company. B was also engaged in the lumber business for himself.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Cabarrus Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Dep't of State Treasurer

    830 S.E.2d 643 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2019

    *644 The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of August 2019 by North Carolina School Board Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.