Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • State v. . Little

    175 N.C. 743 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1917

    Cases, 408; Cartwright's case , 114 Mass. 230 ; S. v. Steube , 3 Ohio C.C. 383 ; In re Healy , 53 Vt. 694 ; People v. Wilson , 64 Ill. 195 ; Ex parte McLeod , 120 F. 130 ; U.S. v. Anonymous , 21 F. 761 ; U.S. v. … Wilmot , in King v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Herndon Ex Rel. Herndon v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Board of Education

    899 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 19, 1995

    See Murphy v. Arkansas, 852 F.2d 1039, 1043 (8th Cir.1988); Null v. Board of Educ., 815 F.Supp. 937, 939 (S.D.W.Va.1993); see also Cornwell v. … and traditional values be they social, moral, or political” (internal quotations and citations omitted)); Yoder, 406 U.S. at 221 , 92 S.Ct. at 1536 ; Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Broyhill Furniture Industries

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 13, 1997

    Operation of the machines required plaintiff to repetitively use his hands to grasp, flip, and rotate boards to run them in the machines. The machines vibrated when processing the boards. 5. … Brown Crosby, a hand surgeon, on April 11, 1995. Left carpal tunnel release surgery was performed on May 15, 1995, with the surgery on the right wrist on May 3, 1995. 11.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. . Gouge

    157 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1911

    BROWN, J. dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CLARK. … S. v. Bullard , 100 N.C. 486 . But this the State did not attempt to do.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Huey

    204 N.C. App. 513 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2010

    The bus driver told the officers that no one had recently boarded or departed the bus. … In addition, it was reported that the suspect was wearing a brown leather jacket, jeans, brown suede boots, and a black knit ski hat. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burnet v. Commissioners of Bladen County

    184 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1922

    the board of education of said county into one township high school district. … Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 300 . Barring certain exceptions, tbe general rule Is that the Legislature may validate retrospectively any proceeding which it might have authorized in advance. Anderson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wolfenden v. . Commissioners

    152 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1910

    V, of the Constitution. … Peterson v. Bank , 8 Kan. App. 508 ; Sumner v. Colfax Co. , 14 Neb. 524 ; Wiley v. Flournoy , 30 Ark. 609 ; Yocum v. Bank , 144 Ind. 272 ; Phillips v. New Buffalo , 64 Mich. 683 ; Auditor v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wingler v. . Miller

    223 N.C. 15 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1943

    E., 233 ; Brown v. B. R., 195 N. C., 699 , 143 S. E., 536 ; Robinson v. Ivey, 193 N. C., 805 , 138 S. E., 173 . Tbe third exception is to tbe evidence of Dr. … Bank v. Snow, 221 N. C., 14 , 18 S. E. (2d), 711 ; S. v. Gibson, ibid., 252; Brown v. Ward, ibid., 344. Assignments of error numbers 9, 10, 12 and 29 are based on numerous exceptions to tbe testimony of Mrs.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & Associates

    362 N.C. 269 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 2008

    Background On 24 November 1998, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (Board) contracted with the architectural firm of Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. … Farmers Bank v. Michael T. Brown Distribs., Inc., 307 N.C. 342, 347-48 , 298 S.E.2d 357, 360 (1983).

    Cited 86 timesPublished
  • Lenoir v. . Crabtree

    158 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

    In the recent case of Shelby v. … Ward v. Willis , 51 N.C. 183 ; Land Co. v. Hotel , 132 N.C. 522 ; S. v. Twiford , 136 N.C. 609 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hargrave v. . Commissioners

    168 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 14, 1915

    BROWN, J., dissenting. … In Comrs. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lenoir County v. Crabtree

    158 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

    C., 196 , Brown, J., says: “It is well settled that unless by legislative enactment no title can be acquired against the public by user alone, nor loss to the public by nonuser.” Commonwealth v. Morehead, 4 Am. … Ward v. Willis, 51 N. C., 183 ; Land Co. v. Hotel, 132 N. C., 522 ; S. v. Twiford, 136 N. C., 609 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Steelman v. City of New Bern

    279 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 10, 1971

    Pitts, 244 Ark. 1239 , 429 S.W. 2d 45 (1968); Brown v. City of Omaha, 183 Neb. 430 , 160 N.W. 2d 805 (1968); Tucker v. City of Okolona, 227 So. 2d 475 (Miss. 1969); Becker v. Beaudoin, 261 A. 2d 896 (R.I. 1970). … G.S. 153-9 (44) (Board of County Commissioners) ; G.S. 115-53 (City and County Boards of Education) ; G.S. 115A-17 (Boards of Trustees of Community Colleges) ; G.S. 143-291 *595 allowed agencies and departments of the State

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Cannon v. ZONING BD. OF ADJ. OF WILMINGTON

    308 S.E.2d 735 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1983

    CANNON, Cannon Heating & Air Conditioning Company, and the City of Wilmington, North Carolina, Petitioners, v. The ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the CITY OF WILMINGTON, North Carolina, James A. … The duty of the Superior Court in reviewing the decision of a town board sitting as a quasi-judicial body was succinctly enunciated by Justice Carlton in Concrete Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shepard v. Telegraph Co.

    143 N.C. 244 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1906

    Board of Education v. Makely, 139 N. … In Harrison v. Tel. Co., ante, Brown, J., says that “the condition of the mind is as susceptible of proof as the state of the digestion, and can be proved by the personal testimony of the sufferer.”

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • State v. Haywood

    295 N.C. 709 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1978

    State v. Goines, 273 N.C. 509 , 160 S.E. 2d 469 (1968). It is immediately apparent from an examination of the facts that the court properly overruled the motion as to defendants Watkins and Brown. … Edwards, 396 Mich. 551 , 242 N.W. 2d 739 (1976); People v. Brown, 26 N.Y. 2d 88 , 308 N.Y.S. 2d 825 , 257 N.E. 2d 16 , 43 A.L.R. 3d 1407 (1970); Howard v. Jessup, 519 P. 2d 913 (Okla. 1973); Hines v.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Vaughn v. Hertford County B.O.E.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 19, 2001

    School Board Association as the servicing agent. 3. The employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all relevant times. 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pinehurst Airlines, Inc. v. Resort Air Services, Inc.

    476 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 1, 1979

    Initially the Court points out that the Moore County Board of Commissioners’ (“Board”) operation of the Airport is a proprietary undertaking. See Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. … The same letter appears as Exhibit F to the Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss of defendants Board, Moore County Airport Committee (“Committee”), Taylor, Phillips, Davis, Brown and Timberlake. 5 . Scheuer v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Noble v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

    151 N.C. 76 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1909

    Tanner v. Lumber Co., 140 N. C., 475 , and cases cited; Shaw v. Mfg. Co., 146 N. C., 236 ; Avery v. Lumber Co., 146 N. C., 592 . … Tanner v. Lumber Co., supra.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Topp v. BIG ROCK FOUNDATION, INC.

    221 N.C. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2012

    See Lough v. … Fisheries Ass’n, Inc. v. Brown, 917 F. Supp. 1108 , 1115 n.15 (E.D. Va. 1996).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.