Case law

BD. OF ED., MT. VERNON SCHOOLS, ETC. v. Shank

542 S.W.2d 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1976

In addition, the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the board’s decision, together with all reasonable inferences which support it. Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. … Hanebrink v. Parker, 506 S.W.2d 455, 458 (Mo.App.1974). Also the determination of the credibility of the witnesses is a function of the administrative tribunal. Hanebrink v. Parker, supra, 458.” Merideth v.

Delise diaz v. Autozoners, LLC, D/B/A Autozone

484 S.W.3d 64 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2015

But Brown did not call Diaz back. 10 Diaz waited a couple of weeks before calling Brown again. … This time she spoke with Brown and advised Brown of the harassment, but Brown cut the conversation short because she had a meeting; she told Diaz she would either call back or “pop in the store” soon to see her.

Flegel v. Christian Hosp. Northeast-Northwest

804 F. Supp. 1165 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 26, 1992

Flegel has published at least six papers in Board of the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery. As such, Dr. … See, e.g., Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital, 945 F.2d 696 (4th Cir.1991); Goss v. Memorial Hospital System, 789 F.2d 353, 355 (5th Cir.1986); and Brown v.

Holtcamp v. State

259 S.W.3d 537 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 2008

LeFevre v. Stubbs, 642 S.W.2d 103 (Mo. banc 1982), cited by the majority, the Court broadly construed a statute dealing with the redemption of a deed of trust to real estate. In turn, Stubbs cited State ex rel. Brown v. … Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S.W. 85 (1922), a case involving the statutory authority of the St. Louis superintendent of schools.

State Ex Rel. Copeland v. Wurdeman

295 Mo. 458 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 27, 1922

Ponath v. Hamilton, 240 S. … [Gantt v. Brown, 238 Mo. 560 ; State ex rel. Feinstein v. Hartmann, 231 S. W. 986 .] But such is not the case here. These documents are sought to be used before a grand jury. In character this case is like State ex rel.

Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. v. Vilkins

712 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1986

Joseph, Inc. v. … See also the there footnoted cases of Duff v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Corp., 363 Mo. 944 , 255 S.W.2d 792, 793-794 [1] (Mo. banc 1953); State v. Brown, 446 S.W.2d 498, 500 [4] (Mo.App.1969); and Campbell v.

City of St. Louis v. Franklin Bank

341 Mo. 913 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1937

Louis v. Abeln, supra.] … Louis v.

Exchange National Bank v. A.J. Rackers, Inc. (In Re A.J. Rackers, Inc.)

167 B.R. 168 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · May 5, 1994

Turner v. Browne, 351 Mo. 541 , 173 S.W.2d 868, 875 (1943). … Leibson v. Henry, 204 S.W.2d at 317 .

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co.

170 Mo. App. 503 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1913

[Grunby v. Brown, 86 Mo. 1 . c. 258.] But the court struck out the defense setting up the fact that there was an unreasonable delay. … if they did not make a selection, the board of public works should do so.

Caldwell v. J. A. Kreis & Sons

227 Mo. App. 127 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1932

[Higgins v. Boiler Co., 328 Mo. 493 , 41 S. W. (2d) 565 ; Wheeler v. Ry. Co., 328, Mo. 888, 42 S. W. (2d) 579 .] … [Turner v. Noble, 211 Mo. App. 656 , 249 S. W. 103 , and cases therein cited; Eulinberg v. Life Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 261 S. W. 725 .]

State Ex Rel. Elliott's Department Store Co. v. Haid

330 Mo. 959 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1932

App. 77 , 77 S.W. 335 ; Scott v. Kline's (Mo. App.), 284 S.W. 831 ; Glaser v. Rothchild, 221 Mo. 180 , 120 S.W. 1 ; Oakley v. Richards, 275 Mo. 266 , 204 S.W. 505 ; Hendricken v. Meadows, 154 Mass. 599 ; Brown v. … caught on the back edge of the board, causing her to fall.

Hunter v. Garanflo

246 Mo. 131 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1912

BROWN. C. … Much learning has been collected upon the subject in a note to the Alabama case of Hall v. Henderson, 61 L. R.

Meramec Valley R-III School District v. City of Eureka

281 S.W.3d 827 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2009

Discussion Point I — Blight In determining whether an area is blighted, and in approving a Redevelopment Plan, the Board acts in its legislative capacity. JG St. Lotus West Ltd. Liability Co. v. … Point III — Fairly Debatable Test v. Summary Judgment Standard In determining whether an area is blighted and in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Board acts in its legislative capacity. JG St.

City of St. Louis v. International Harvester Company

350 S.W.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1961

Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 , 56 S.W. 298 , loc. cit. 302(5). … Louis v.

Humfeld v. Langkop

591 S.W.2d 251 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1979

Calvin v. Lane, 297 S.W.2d 572 (Mo.App.1957); Donati v. Gualdoni, 358 Mo. 667 , 216 S.W.2d 519 (1949); Gavin v. Forrest, 230 Mo.App. 662 , 72 S.W.2d 177 (1934); Buehler v. Baum, 71 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1934); Carson v. … Stewart v. Droste, supra; Curators, etc. v. Nebraska Prestressed Concrete, 526 S.W.2d 903 (Mo.App.1975); Brummet v. Livingston, 384 S.W.2d 101 (Mo.App.1965); Cavic v.

May v. Greater Kansas City Dental Society

863 S.W.2d 941 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1993

Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d 146, 150 (Mo.1969). Plaintiff May contends the words libeled him in his professional capacity as a dentist. … Jones v. Williams, 357 Mo. 531 , 209 S.W.2d 907, 911 (1948). In Baker v.

State v. Taylor

134 Mo. 109 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1896

Cora is a village on the same railroad, about midway between Browning and Milan. At Browning defendant William P. … And reside in Browning? A. Yes, sir.”

State v. Hays

23 Mo. 287 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1856

In the case of the State v. … (Smith v. Kerr, 1 Barb. 155 ; Stiles v. Tilford, 10 Wend. 338 ; Prince v. Shepperd & Ropes, 9 Pick. 176 ; Branch v. Doane, 17 Conn. 403 ; Landon v. Humphrey, 9 Conn. 209 ; Fitch v. Chapman, 10 Conn. 8 .)

Bass v. Kansas City Journal Post Co.

347 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1941

In this connection attention may also be called to Barnes v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, 341 Mo. 563 , 108 S. W. (2d) 58 ; Flori v. Dolph (Mo.), 192 S. W. 949 ; Coul v. Peck Dry Goods Company, 326 Mo. 870 , 32 S. … The Missouri cases most closely in point are Skidmore v. Haggard, supra; Hoelker v. American Press, 317 Mo. 64 , 296 S. W. 1008 ; Coul v. Peck Dry Goods Company, supra; and Semper v. American Press, 217 Mo.

Mary Broyles v. Department of Community Health & Environment of St. Charles County

456 S.W.3d 517 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2015

Charles County Division of Human Services (Division Director) declared a brown and black male German Shepherd named Diesel, to be a dangerous dog, pursuant to St. Charles County Ordinance, Section 205.142. … “We ‘must look to the whole record in reviewing the Board’s decision, not merely at that evidence that supports its decision, ‘and we no longer view the evidence in the light most favorable to the agency’s decision.’”