Case law

Moody v. State Prison.

53 L.R.A. 855 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1901

County Board v. State Board , 106 N.C. 81 . The statute incorporating the defendant (Laws 1899, ch. 24), does not contain the authority "to sue and be sued." … Lorillard v. Monroe , 11 N. Y., 392 ; Brown v. People , 75 N.Y. 441 .

King v. . Blackwell

96 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1887

The statute (The Code, §2014,) invests the board of county commissioners in each county of the State, with full power and authority “to appoint and settle ferries; to order the laying out of public roads when necessary; to … Brown v. Calloway, 90 N. C., 118 ; Terry v. Railroad, 91 N. C., 236 ; Fry v. Currie, Ibid., 436; Davis v. Council, 92 N. C., 725 ; Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 99 .

C. C. Mangum, Inc. v. Gasperson

262 N.C. 32 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1964

A red flag, “10 to 12 inches by 7 or 8 inches,” was attached to the end of the clip-board by a piece of wire. Dampier testified: “When you waved the board, the flag would flop back and forth. … In Equipment Co. v. Hertz Corp. and Contractors, Inc. v.

McNeil v. North Carolina

248 F. Supp. 867 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 27, 1965

Jackson v. … Michel v.

Amerson v. Willis

109 N.C. App. 297 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1993

In Reliable Trucking Co. v. … See Ponder v. Budweiser of Asheville, Inc., 30 N.C.

State Ex Rel. Wooten v. White

125 N.C. 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1899

Neither the relator nor his agent, Brown, knew of that arrangement. … When a sheriff receives the tax list, with the proper order for collection endorsed thereon by the clerk of the Board of Commissioners, the same is in the nature of an execution.

Research Triangle Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

962 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 14, 1997

Whittle v. United States, 7 F.3d 1259, 1262 (6th Cir.1993). … McDonald's Corp. v. United States, 926 F.2d 1126, 1129 (Fed.Cir.1991); see also United States v.

In Re the Appeal of Asheville Citizen-Times Publishing Co.

281 N.C. 210 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1972

Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L.ed. 678; Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Bowers, and U. S. Plywood Corporation v. City of Algoma, 358 U.S. 534 , 3 L.ed. 2d 490, 79 S.Ct. 383 . In Brown v. … The court held that the “original package” concept as applied to goods imported for the purpose of sale in the case of Brown v.

Alexander v. . Commissioners

70 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

V. That the Board of Commissioners, holding office from 1868 to 1870, refused to levy any tax to meet the interest on said bonds. … As to the bonds signed by Brown, before the abolition of the County Courts, it may be observed, so as to put the case squarely on the validity of the latter class, i. e. , the $37,500 signed by Brown and countersigned by

Moore v. Bd. of Elections of Henderson Cnty.

803 S.E.2d 164 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 2017

NC State Bd. of Educ. v. State

804 S.E.2d 740 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2017

Cameron v. Cameron

235 N.C. 82 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1952

Seawell v. Purvis, 232 N.C. 194 , 59 S.E. 2d *85 572; Taylor v. Schaub, 225 N.C. 134 , 33 S.E. 2d 658 ; Moore v. Moore, 224 N.C. 552 , 31 S.E. 2d 690 ; Brown v. Polk, 201 N.C. 375 , 160 S.E. 357 ; Bank v. … It is well settled that in an action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, it is permissible for the defendant to set up a cause of action for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board, as a counterclaim

Abbott v. North Carolina Bd. of Nursing

177 N.C. App. 45 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2006

The legislative enactment, governmental appointment of members to the Board, and public purpose performed by the Board make the Board an agency of the state entitled to the defense of sovereign immunity. See Mazzucco v. … See Paquette v.

At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment

11 F. Supp. 2d 769 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 17, 1998

See Michigan Coalition of Radioactive Material Users, Inc. v. … See Textile Workers Union of America v.

Mason v. . Durham

175 N.C. 639 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1918

WALKER, J., dissenting, BROWN, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. This is an action by Mary B. … This was so held as to railroads in Caveness v. R. R. , 172 N.C. 305 ; Bennett v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 389 ; Porter v. R. R. , 148 N.C. 563 ; Beasley v. R. R. , 145 N.C. 272 . As to telegraph companies in Phillips v. R.

Moore v. . State

200 N.C. 300 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 27, 1931

Rawlings v. Neal, 122 N. C., 173 ; Binford v. Alston, 15 N. C., 351 . … Brown v. Appleby, 139 Wis., 195 , 120 N. W., 861 ; McCumber v. Waukesha Co., 91 Wis., 442 , 65 N. W., 51 ; 3 Cyc., 877; 2 Ruling Case Law, p. 491, par. 52.

Wright v. North Carolina

975 F. Supp. 2d 539 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 17, 2014

Here, as in Fitts v. … Brown v. Thomson, 462 U.S. 835, 842-43 , 103 S.Ct. 2690 , 77 L.Ed.2d 214 (1983).

State v. Murvin

304 N.C. 523 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

Albertson saw defendant go through the boarding gate. She testified that he was leaving North Carolina so he wouldn’t get caught. … Defendant, relying on State v.

State Ex Rel. Greene v. Owen

125 N.C. 212 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1899

Hunter , 65 N.C. 603 ; Clark v. Stanly , 66 N.C. 59 ; Brown v. Turner , 70 N.C. 93 ; Bunting v. Gales , 77 N.C. 382 ; Vann v. Pipkin , 77 N.C. 408 ; Prairie v. Worth , 78 N.C. 169 ; Lyon v. … Aiken , 78 N.C. 258 ; McNamee v. Alexander , 109 N.C. 246 ; State v. Cutshall; 110 N.C. 545 ; Board of Education v. Kenan , 112 N.C. 568 ; State v. Womble , 112 N.C. 867 ; Trotter v.

Cordell v. Grove Stone and Sand Company

247 N.C. 688 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1958

Tuttle v. Building Corp., supra; Brimmer *692 v. Brimmer, 174 N.C. 435 , 93 S.E. 984 ; Watson v. Manufacturing Co., 147 N.C. 469 , 61 S.E. 273 . In R. R. v. … Johnson v. Ins. Co., 172 N.C. 142 , citing Smith v. R. R., 68 N.C. 115 ; Rumbough v. Improvement Co., 112 N.C. 751 ; Morgan v. Benefit Society, 167 N.C. 265 .” In the case of Smith v. R.