Case law

United States v. Brown

700 A.2d 760 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1997

The possibility that the officers identified Brown in one another’s presence also does not raise concerns of undue suggestivity. See Hunter, 692 A.2d at 1375 n. 4; Harvey v. … Patterson v. United States, 384 A.2d 663, 665 (D.C.1978). . Singletary v. United States, 383 A.2d 1064, 1068 (D.C.1978). .Greenwood v.

Brown v. Fbi

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 2013

\v\\ FILED UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT coURT JUN - 6 2013 FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA cum U_S_ umw & Bankmpwy courts mr me nistricr 01 columbia Margie Brown, ) ) Plaintiff, ) l v. ) Civil Action No. … See GAF Corp. v. United States, 818 F.2d 90l, 917-20 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Jackson v. United Stales, 730 F.2d 808, 809 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Stokes v. U.S. Postal Service, 937 F. Supp. ll, 14 (D.D.C. l996).

Brown v. United States

763 A.2d 1137 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2000

On the evening of November 27, 1998, Steven Williams telephoned the police and requested assistance in picking up his children from 1641 V Street, Southeast, where their aunt, appellant Latasha Brown, resided. … Price v.

Davis v. Brown

311 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2004

Green v. … V.

Brown v. United States

932 A.2d 521 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2007

Brown.” 3 . Winfield v. United States, 676 A.2d 1 (D.C.1996) (en banc). 4 . … Brown.”

Brown v. United States

675 A.2d 953 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 1996

To the contrary, Brown’s probation revocation was a continuation of the prosecution of his first offense. See Jones v. United States, 669 A.2d 724, 727 (D.C.1995); Hardy v. … Brown’s reliance on legislative history is foreclosed by this court’s decisions in Foote and in Stevenson v.

Brown v. Hill

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2021

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 249 F. Supp. 3d 439, 442 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Maniaci v. Georgetown Univ., 510 F. Supp. 2d 50, 59 (D.D.C. 2007)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2.

Brown v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2012

B (Letter to plaintiff from Philip Miller, Paralegal Specialist, Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, dated June 30, 2010). … Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005).

Brown v. United States

740 A.2d 533 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1999

Scull v. United States, 564 A.2d 1161, 1164 (D.C.1989). As we pointed out in Brown I, this standard is a “fairly lenient” one. Brown I, 683 A.2d at 125 . … See Ford v.

Brown v. United States

271 F. Supp. 2d 225 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2003

Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao, 226 F.Supp.2d 191 (D.D.C.2002). See Krooth & Altman v. North Am. Life Assur. … See Davis-Warren Auctioneers, J.V. v.

Brown v. United States

576 A.2d 731 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1990

M.A.P. v. … See Price v. United States, 531 A.2d 984 , 989 n. 7 (D.C.1987). 1 Brown was convicted of statutory rape, of which assault with intent to commit statutory rape is a lesser-included offense. United States v.

Brown v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2012

Brown, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Heck v. Humphrey, 5 512 U.S. 477,486-87 (1994); see, e.g., Taylor v. US.

Brown v. Vilsack

866 F. Supp. 2d 23 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2012

B (Letter to plaintiff from Philip Miller, Paralegal Specialist, Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, dated June 30, 2010). … .”); see also Anderson v.

Amobi v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2021

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 212–13 (2007) (emphasis added); see also Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. … See, e.g., Johnson v. District of Columbia, 368 F.

District of Columbia v. Wilson

721 A.2d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1998

Russell Brown’s illness and death. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, see, e.g., District of Columbia v. … Brown v. AVEMCO Investment Corp., 603 F.2d 1367, 1371 (9th Cir.1979). To the extent that language in Watts v.

Hogan v. Brown

1 D.C. 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802

Brown v. Tonkin

1 D.C. 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1802

Brown v. McIntosh

265 F. 1011 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1920

The interference originally involved three parties, Brown, Kritz, and McIntosh. Kritz, however, did not appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner. … In the final paragraph of the Assistant Commissioner’s decision, he says: •‘McIntosh was the first to conceive the invention and his application was filed before Brown reduced the invention to practice, either actually or

Brown v. United States

554 A.2d 1157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1989

Obregon v. … See also Rogers v.

Brown v. Petersen

25 App. D.C. 359 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1905

Crane v. Morris, 6 Pet. 598 , 8 L. ed. 514; Kelly v. Jack *364 son, 6 Pet. 622 , 8 L. ed. 523; United States v. Wiggins, 14 Pet. 334 , 10 L. ed. 481; Quock Ting v. United States, 140 U. S. 417 , 35 L. ed. 501, 11 Sup. … Rep. 733, 851; The City of New York (Alexandre v. Machan) 147 U. S. 72 , 37 L. ed. 84, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 211. We find no error in tbe record, and tbe judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed, with costs.