Case law

Henderson v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ.

253 N.C. App. 416 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 16, 2017

However, because “[w]e believe that dismissing this appeal as interlocutory would likely waste judicial resources[,]” Legacy Vulcan Corp. v. Garren, 222 N.C. App. 445, 447, 731 S.E.2d 223, 225 (2012) (citing Brown v. … Instead, plaintiff contends defendant Board waived governmental immunity by entering into a contract with defendant CBC. See Smith v.

Butner v. . Lumber Co.

180 N.C. 612 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 24, 1920

A similar application of the principle had been previously made in Marlowe v. … Sawyer v. R. R. , 142 N.C. 1 ; Vassor v. R. R. , 142 N.C. 68 ; Daniel v. R. R. , 136 N.C. 517 ; Howe v. Newmarch , 94 Mass. 559 ; Stone v. Pugh , 115 Tenn. 688 ; Schulwitz v. Lumber Co. , 126 Mich. 559 ; Kiernan v.

State v. Mincher

172 N.C. 895 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 9, 1916

In S. v. Speaks, 94 N. … In the prevailing opinion in S. v. Nipper, 166 N. C., 272 ,- Mr.

CITIZENS ADDRESSING REASSIGNMENT AND EDUCATION, INC. v. Wake County Board of Education

659 S.E.2d 438 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

659 S.E.2d 438 (2008) CITIZENS ADDRESSING REASSIGMENT AND EDUCATION, INC., Jade John Litcher and Elizabeth Lee Haner v. WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 254P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 6, 2008.

Kirby v. Reynolds

212 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1937

Conrad v. Board of Education, 190 N. C., 389 (393); Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue, 209 N. C., 47 (48). Tbe language in Harley & Lund Corp. v. … Perry v. Ins. Co., 137 N. C., 404 . Tbe principle is thus stated in Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N.

American National Electric Corp. v. Poythress Commercial Contractors, Inc.

167 N.C. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 2004

James v. Clark, 118 N.C. App. 178, 180-81 , 454 S.E.2d 826, 828 (1995) (quoting Watts v. Cumberland County Hosp. System, 75 N.C. … Rose v. Materials Co., 282 N.C. 643, 658 , 194 S.E.2d 521, 532 (1973).

State v. Maye

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2024

COA24-77 Filed 6 August 2024 Lenoir County, No. 18 CRS 51929 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LEON MAYE A.K.A. DANNY BROWN, Defendant, KENYA L. … On 2 August 2023, the Lenoir County School Board (the “Board”)1 filed an objection to ASC’s motion.

Johnson v. N.C. Veterinary Med. Bd.

793 S.E.2d 270 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2016

Smith v. Patton.

131 N.C. 396 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1902

Presson v. Boone, 108 N. C., 78 ; Bd. Education v. Bateman, 102 N. C., 52 ; 11 Am. St. Rep., 708 ; Morgan v. Smith, 95 N. C., 396 ; Havens v. Lathene, 75 N. C., 505 ; Board of Commissioners v. Clarke, 73 N. … Presson v. Boone, supra; Sharp v. Connelly, 105 N. C., 87 ; Thomas v. Connelly, 104 N. C., 342 ; Cassidy Ex Parte, 95 N. C., 225 ; Brown v. Coble, 76 N. C., 391 ; Greenlee v. Sudderth, 65 N. C., 470 ; Broughton v.

ME Ex Rel. CE v. BOARD OF EDUC. FOR BUNCOMBE

186 F. Supp. 2d 630 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 11, 2002

Thompson v. Board of Special Sch. Dist., 144 F.3d 574 , 579 n. 3 (8th Cir.1998) (emphasis added) (citations omitted); accord, Sandler v. … Dong v. Board of Educ. of Rochester Comty.

State Ex Rel. Bryan v. Rousseau

71 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Bynum| Ji The State on the relation of Fell & Bro. v. Porter et al, 69 N. C. Reports 140, is decisive [of this case.

Hughes v. Knott.

138 N.C. 105 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1905

In Armitage v. Insole, 14 Ad. & Ell. (68 E. C. L. ) 727, *109 tbe plaintiffs sued for breach of contract by the defendants “to deliver free on board” a quantity of coal. … Brown v. Atkinson, 91 N. C., 389 . We have been unable to find any authority in regard to the question as to what would constitute readiness and ability under the. circumstances testified to by the plaintiff Plughes.

Graham County v. . Terry

194 N.C. 22 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 10, 1927

Barnes v. Barnes, 53 N. C., 366 . … We are not inadvertent to tbe principle that tbe law of contract enters into tbe contract itself (Hill v. Brown, 144 N.

Medlin v. Bass

327 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1990

(emphasis added); see also Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 93 N.C. … Brown, 93 N.C. App. at 437 , 378 S.E.2d at 235 .

Ehmann v. Medflow, Inc.

2019 NCBC 9 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 6, 2019

See Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 523, 507 S.E.2d 894, 896 (1998). In construing a statute, a court “looks first to the plain meaning of the words of the statute itself.” State v. … Jenner v. Ecoplus, Inc., 224 N.C. App. 275, 277–78, 737 S.E.2d 121, 123 (2012) (citing Brown, 349 N.C. at 522–23, 507 S.E.2d at 895–96); see Coastal Ready- Mix Concrete Co. v.

Foil v. Board of Drainage Comrs. of Big Cold Water Drainage District No. 1

192 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1926

Drain *655 age Comrs. v. Sparks, 179 N. C., 581 ; Pate v. Banks, 178 N. C., 139 ; Taylor v. Drainage Comrs., 176 N. C., 224 . C. … Helme v. Guy, 6 N. C., 342 . An “appurtenance” has been defined as “a thing which belongs to another thing as principal, and which passes as incident to the principal thing.”

Board of Trustees of the Fairmont Graded School District v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.

181 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1921

Again, it is insisted that as the present act contains provisions for a bond issue, it should be upheld under the principle of Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 598 ; Mills v. Comrs., 175 N. … Ill, Private Laws 1917, but in Dickson v.

Patterson v. . Commissioners

170 N.C. 503 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1915

That the said board of highway commissioners was empowered by said act to issue and sell bonds for the purpose of securing funds to construct said roads. 4. … and upkeep of all such bridges and culverts (505) still remain in and devolve upon the board of county commissioners of Swain County as provided for under the general law.

Johnson v. Wagner

219 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1941

Brown, 29 Ill., 201 , as follows: “From very necessity a power must exist somewhere in the community to grant relief in such cases of absolute necessity, and under our system of jurisprudence, that power is vested in the … the powers conferred upon said board as herein defined.

Hood Ex Rel. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Financial Control

203 N.C. 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 1932

In Morgan v. Bank, 190 N. C., 209 , 129 S. … Trust Co. v. Rose, 192 N. C., 673 , 135 S. E., 795 .