Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.80s
Florence Concrete Products, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board for General Contractors
113 N.C. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1994
Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc., 91 N.C. App. 459, 463 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 344 (1988). … This analysis finds support in cases such as Mill-Power Supply Co. v. CVM Assocs., 85 N.C. App. 455 , 355 S.E.2d 245 (1987) and *274 Duke University v. American Arbitration Ass’n, 64 N.C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGarrett v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System ex rel. Board of Trustees
91 N.C. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1988
The relevant portions of the death benefit provisions of the statute are as follows: Upon receipt of proof, satisfactory to the Board of Trustees in their capacity as trustees under the Group Life Insurance Plan, of the death … In Stanley v. Retirement and Health Benefits Division, 55 N.C.
Cited 1 timesPublishedC'Est Bon, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control
331 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 7, 1971
Cited 1 timesPublishedToomer v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
360 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
807 S.E.2d 578 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe B'd of Com. of Craven v. . B'd of Com. of Pamlico
73 N.C. 298 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875
Moore v. Ballard, 69 N. C., 21 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
806 S.E.2d 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedBROWN V. FIRST ADVANTAGE BACKGROUND SERVICES CORP.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 11, 2025
Doe v. Pub. Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 271 (4th Cir. 2014) (quoting Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. … Dep’t of State Police v. Wash. Post, 386 F.3d 567, 576 (4th Cir. 2004).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSilver v. Halifax Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners
805 S.E.2d 297 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 26, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Department of Crime Control & Public Safety v. Greene
172 N.C. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005
In this role, respondent supervised two employees, including Shawnda Brown (Brown). Respondent had hired Brown to work for petitioner one year previously. Brown also applied for the Personnel Analyst I position. … Little v. Board of Dental Examiners, 64 N.C. App. 67, 69 , 306 S.E.2d 534, 536 (1983).
Cited 10 timesPublishedStorm v. Town of Wrightsville Beach
189 N.C. 679 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1925
In Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough, 187 N. C., p. 77, we said: “As was said in Board of Education v. Comrs., supra (183 N. … C., 275 ; Brown v. Stewart, 134 N. C., 357 ; Comrs. v. Packing Co., 135 N. C., 62 ; Claywell v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 657 ; Road Comrs. v. Comrs., 178 N. C., 61 . A different state of facts were presented in Brown v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedSmith v. Butler Mountain Estates Property Owners Ass'n
90 N.C. App. 40 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988
Brown and Dorothy S. … The architectural review board consists of the Board of Directors and the existing homeowners in Butler Mountain Estates.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAppalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Shelby
52 N.C. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1981
Durham County v. Addison, 262 N.C. 280 , 136 S.E. 2d 600 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 . … Carrithers & Son v.
Cited 6 timesPublished243 N.C. 695 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 1956
Alexander v. Brown, 236 N.C. 212 , 72 S.E. 2d 522 ; Aldridge v. Ins. Co., 194 N.C. 683 , 140 S.E. 706 . The exercise of the court’s discretion is not subject to review. Smith v. Ins. … Cherry v. Warehouse, 237 N.C. 362 , 75 S.E. 2d 124 ; Supply Co. v. Ice Co., 232 N.C. 684 , 61 S.E. 2d 895 ; Ballard v. Ballard, 230 N.C. 629 , 55 S.E. 2d 316 ; Gibbs v. Russ, 223 N.C. 349 , 26 S.E. 2d 909 ; Brown v.
Cited 33 timesPublished74 N.C. App. 394 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1985
Later, when Perry and his brother returned, Perry gave Nooney two brown envelopes. Nooney then approached Cox and sold him the two brown envelopes, containing marijuana, and a beer. … State v. Mack, 282 N.C. 334 , 193 S.E. 2d 71 (1972).
Cited 1 timesPublished174 N.C. 112 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917
Brown, J. The facts are that the relators were elected highway commissioners by the following votes: John T. Cole, 321 votes; W. B. Mas-sengill, 321 votes; S. W. Brown, 318 votes. The defendant John W. … Massengill, who were members of the old board of highway commissioners of said township, the books, records, and all other property of the highway commission.
Cited 0 timesPublished160 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1912
J., and BROWN, J., dissenting. … By the statute, the boards were not authorized to act at all until a properly signed petition had been filed. R. R. v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedSave Our Schools of Bladen County, Inc. v. Bladen County Board of Education
140 N.C. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 3, 2000
Attend the Board of Education’s public meeting this Monday, June 30 at 7:30 p.m. … Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d. 778, 779 (1989) (citations omitted). A survey of cases involving delayed challenges to state actions may be found in Taylor, 290 N.C. 608 , 227 S.E.2d 576 .
Cited 11 timesPublished227 N.C. 665 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1947
Clodfelter v. State, 86 N. C., 51 , 41 Am. Rep., 440 ; Brown’s Admr. v. Town of Guyandotte, 34 W. Va., 299 , 12 S. E., 707 ; 41 Am. Jur., 896 . See discussion in Hunt v. High Point, 226 N. C., 74 , 36 S. E. (2d), 694 . … See Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 226 N. C., 332 , 38 S. E. (2d), 105 ; Hobbs v. Washington, supra; Moffitt v. Asheville, supra; Manuel v. Comrs., 98 N. C., 9 , 3 S. E., 829 ; Anno. 46 A. L. R., 111, s. 61, A. L.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWood v. Duke Land & Improvement Co.
165 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1914
Dorsey v. Henderson, supra; Jones v. Henderson, supra; Meade v. Portland, 200 U. S., 148 ; Gosler v. Georgetown, 19 U. S., 593 ; Galt v. Chicago, 174 Ill., 605 ; Esles v. Owen, 90 Mo., 113 ; McCormack v. … It is urged for plaintiff that his cause comes rather under the decision of Brown v. Electric Co., 138 N. C., 535 ; but we may not concur in this view.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna