Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

2.22s

  • Elam ex rel. Waynesville R-VI School District v. Waynesville R-VI School District

    676 S.W.2d 880 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1984

    In Rible v. Hughes, 24 Cal.2d 437 , 150 P.2d 455 (1944), 154 A.L.R. 137 , it was expressly held that increments for additional education may be terminated. Also see Brown v. … Magenheim v. Board of Education, 347 S.W.2d 409 (Mo.App.1961). The point is denied.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. George

    176 Mo. App. 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1913

    [Baer v. Pfaff, 44 Mo. App. 35, 10 ; Ring v. Jamison, 66 Mo. 424 ; Curd v. Brown, 148 Mo. 82 , 49 S. W. 990 ; Clark v. Thias, 173 Mo. 628 , 73 S. W. 616 .] … But this falls far short of proving that he was authorized to make a contract for his wife compelling his mother-in-law to pay for her board and any and all care that might become necessary in case of sickness.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dorsch v. Family Medicine, Inc.

    159 S.W.3d 424 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 2005

    See Sofka v. Thal, 662 S.W.2d 502, 506 (Mo. banc 1983). The essential elements of a fraud claim must be strictly proven as pleaded. Wion v. Carl I. Brown & Co., 808 S.W.2d 950, 953 (Mo.App. W.D.1991). … (quoting Brown v. Kirkham, 23 S.W.3d 880, 882-83 (Mo.App. W.D.2000)).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • City of Fenton v. Executive International Inn, Inc.

    740 S.W.2d 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1987

    During a special meeting of the Board of Aldermen at which defendants’ petition for rezoning was discussed, defendants allegedly promised to rebuild a roadway running through its property for use as a public street. … Heitman v. Brown Group, Inc., 638 S.W.2d 316, 319 (Mo.App.1982). At best, as pleaded, defendants’ alleged statement was a promise, and the breach of a promise does not create an action for fraud. Sofka v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Webster Groves Sanitary Sewer District v. Smith

    342 Mo. 365 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1938

    V. … The cases relied upon by respondent are not in point as illustrated by the case of Browning v. Hooper, 269 U. S. 396 , 70 L. Ed. 330 , 46 Sup. Ct. 141.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City of St. Louis v. Meyer

    13 Mo. App. 367 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1883

    Louis v. John G. Priest et al., being the proceedings of the St. … Abbott v. Abbott, 51 Me. 581 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1990

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D.M. v. … State v. Windmiller, 579 S.W.2d 730 , 732 (Mo.App. 1979). See also State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Appelquist, 698 S.W.2d 883 , 894 (Mo.App. 1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dr. Shereen Kader v. Harris Stowe State University, and Board of Regents of Harris Stowe State College

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2024

    Dash v. Taylor, 668 S.W.3d 580, 588 (Mo. App. E.D. 2023) (quoting Cox v. Kan. City Chiefs Football Club, 473 S.W.3d 107, 114 (Mo. banc 2015)). … See Young v. Mo. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 647 S.W.3d 73, 78 (Mo. App. E.D. 2022); Lisek v. Taber, 674 S.W.3d 525, 527 (Mo. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stolov v. Jackson County School District C-1 of Hickman Mills

    408 S.W.3d 218 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2013

    LeFevre v. Stubbs, 642 S.W.2d 103, 107 (Mo. banc 1982) (quoting State ex rel. Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S.W. 85, 87 (1922)). … Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1986)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 1986

    Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 267 , 165 S.W.2d 657 , 662 (banc 1942). … Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, 296 S.W.2d 492 , 487-488 (Mo. banc 1956). In Barnes v. Bailey, No. 67631 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 2-19-86) (may be subject to motion for rehearing) and Payne v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chandler v. Hulen

    335 Mo. 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1934

    Hulen, deceased, for board and lodging furnished and services rendered to said Hulen from June 8, 1914, until his death September 22, 1930. … Cowell v. Roberts, 79 Mo. 218 , 221, quoted approvingly in Brown v. Holman, 292 Mo. 641 , 650, 238 S.W. 1065 , 1068, with the additional statement in Brown v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Michael Taylor v. The Board of Trustees of the Firefighters' Retirement Plan of St. Louis

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 2021

    Lagud v. Kansas City Bd. of Police Comm’rs, 136 S.W.3d 786, 791 (Mo. banc 2004) (alteration in original) (quoting Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 223 (Mo. banc 2003)). … The Board’s credibility determination as to Taylor eliminates the bases for the opinions of Dr. Smith, Dr. Kibby and Mr. Politte. See Dunn v. Treasurer of Mo. as Custodian of Second Inj.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kirksville Missouri Hospital Co. v. Jaynes

    328 S.W.3d 418 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2010

    Faith Hosp. v. Enright, 706 S.W.2d 852, 855 (Mo. banc 1986) (citing State ex rel. Morasch v. Kimberlin, 654 S.W.2d 889 (Mo. banc 1983)). … Tennill v. Roper, 965 S.W.2d 945, 948 (Mo.App. W.D.1998) (quoting Butler v. Mitchellr-Hugehack, Inc., 895 S.W.2d 15, 19 (Mo. banc 1995)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bauer v. TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ST. LOUIS

    88 F. Supp. 2d 999 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 10, 2000

    Gorman v. Abbott Laboratories, 629 F.Supp. 1196, 1199 (D.R.I.1986). Also, the unanimity rule in removal should bar later-joined defendants from removing to federal court. See, e.g., Brown v. … Fourth, as Ford v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Koontz v. City of St. Louis

    230 Mo. App. 128 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1936

    Eugene Brown, a newsboy, eighteen years of age, testified, for plaintiff, as follows: "In 1928 I sold papers at the northeast corner of Natural Bridge *Page 133 and Union Avenues. … [Hackenyos v. City of St. Louis (Mo.), 203 S.W. 986 ; Wolf v. Kansas City (Mo.), 246 S.W. 236 ; Boyd v. Kansas City, 291 Mo. 622 , 237 S.W. 1001 ; Randolph v. City of Springfield (Mo.), 257 S.W. 449 ; Cole v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Porter v. Hudson

    226 Mo. 239 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 1910

    Doud v. Lesueur, 136 Mo. 452 ; State ex rel. v. Williams, 99 Mo. 291 ; State ex rel. v. Boonville Bridge Co., 206 Mo. 74 ; State ex rel. v. … Ann. 676 ; Richmond v. Brown, 97 Va. 26 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis, 145 Mo. 551 ; Dausch v. Crane, 109 Mo. 323 ; Weston v. Newburgh, 67 Hun 127 ; Sheridan v. Fleming, 93 Mo. 321 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • School District Number One v. Holt

    226 Mo. 406 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1910

    As said in Nowack v. … [Browne, Stat. Fr., secs. 448, 487, and cases cited; 2 Story, Eq. Jur., sec. 761, and cases cited.]” In the same opinion the court quoted with approval the following from Glass v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gregory Stiens v. Missouri Department of Agriculture

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2019

    Brown Group, Inc. v. AHC, 649 S.W.2d 874, 878 (Mo. banc 1983). … Brown Group, 649 S.W.2d at 879; see also Jackson v. Bd. of Directors of Sch. Dist. of Kansas City, 9 S.W.3d 68, 71 (Mo. App. W.D. 2000); State ex rel. Rogers v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boeckler Lumber Co. v. Cherokee Realty Co.

    135 Mo. App. 708 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1909

    [McCormack v. Lynch, 69 Mo. App. 524 ; DuBois Borough v. Water Works, 176 Pa. St. 430; Steltheimer v. Killip, 75 N. Y. 282 ; Rayburn v. Denver, 8 Mo. 104 .] … [Leitensdorfer v. Delphy, 15 Mo. 160 ; Hook v. Craighead, 32 Mo. 405 ; Miles v. Stevens, 45 Am. Dec. 62 , and notes; School Comrs. v. Bender, 36 Ind. App. 164 ; Moffett, etc., Co. v. Rochester, 178 U. S. 373 ; Neill v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of DuBois

    875 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1994

    Brokaw v. Board of Education, 171 S.W.2d 75 , 85[18] (Mo.App.1943). This we will not do. Appellate courts do not render advisory opinions or decide nonexistent issues. Warren v. … Compare Brown v. General Motors Assembly Div., 695 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Mo.App.1985).

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.