Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1986

10,000+ results

4.57s

  • Estate of Derek Williams, Jr. v. Jeffrey Cline

    902 F.3d 643 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 31, 2018

    Substantive qualified immunity analysis encompasses two distinct questions: (1) whether defendants violated a constitutional right; and (2) whether that "right was 'clearly established' at the time of the challenged conduct … qualified immunity."

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Anthony Gibson v. Jeffrey Kilpatrick

    773 F.3d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 11, 2014

    was clearly established. … Qualified Immunity A.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • McKally v. Perez

    87 F. Supp. 3d 1310 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 6, 2015

    Once the affirmative defense of qualified immunity is asserted, “unless the plaintiffs allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before … Alvereze, 498 Fed.Appx. 867, 872 (11th Cir.2012) (noting “a defense of qualified immunity may be addressed in a motion to dismiss, which will be granted if the complaint.fails to allege the violation of a clearly established

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Frank Minor v. Delaware River & Bay Authority

    70 F.4th 168 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 8, 2023

    “To resolve a claim of qualified immunity, [we] en- gage in a two-pronged inquiry: (1) whether the plaintiff suffi- ciently alleged the violation of a constitutional right, and (2) whether the right was clearly established … clearly established constitutional right.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Denise Coley v. Lucas County, Ohio

    799 F.3d 530 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2015

    Gray’s argument that his actions did not violate clearly established law thus also fails. 2. … At the time of the events alleged in the complaint, those rights were clearly established.

    Cited 294 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Jarrett

    63 F.4th 971 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 30, 2023

    conduct is clearly established.”22 It just isn’t enough to identify a right as “a broad general proposition.”23 The district court did not address qualified immunity’s second step. … Griffin27 supports that Jarrett and Bridges violated clearly established law.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Flying Dog Brewery, LLLP v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission

    870 F. Supp. 2d 477 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Jun 28, 2012

    clearly established constitutional rights. … Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the Commissioners violated any “clearly established law,” and qualified immunity therefore applies.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Doyle v. Lehi City

    723 Utah Adv. Rep. 7 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Dec 6, 2012

    “Qualified immunity shields [government] officials from money damages unless a plaintiff pleads facts showing (1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established … Accordingly, we address only the “clearly established” prong of the qualified immunity test and need not decide whether Lehi City officials violated the right alleged by Doyle.3 ¶23 “A Government official’s conduct violates

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Eastland County Cooperative Dispatch v. Poyner

    64 S.W.3d 182 · Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · Jan 10, 2002

    The motions for summary judgment implicated the doctrines of sovereign immunity, official immunity, and qualified immunity. … Was that general prohibition the source for clearly established law which the officers violated in this case?

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Estate of Clemente Najera Aguirre v. County of Riverside

    131 F.4th 702 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 11, 2025

    We have held “that the ‘clearly established’ prong of the qualified immunity analysis is a matter of law to be decided by a judge.” Reese v. Cnty. of Sacramento, 888 F.3d 1030, 1037 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Morales v. … Clearly Established Law Assessing qualified immunity after a jury verdict turns on the second, “clearly established” prong, which requires deference to the jury’s view of the facts. See A.D., 712 F.3d at 456.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barnthouse v. City of Edmond

    74 O.B.A.J. 1297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 22, 2003

    Material issues of fact for a jury exist as to: (1) whether Cochran violated Appellants' clearly established constitutional rights for purposes of his individual qualified immunity defense to the § 1988 claim; and (@)whether … Whether Cochran is entitled to qualified immunity where his conduct violated Appellants' right to due process (a constitutional right), and that right was violated by Cochran when it was clearly established at the time of

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dimmitt v. City of Clearwater

    985 F.2d 1565 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 23, 1993

    Ordinarily a litigant offering a facial constitutional challenge to a statute must establish that “no set of circumstances exist under which the Act would be valid.” United States v. … To summarize, by exempting only government flags from the permit requirement, section 134.008(18) clearly restricts speech based upon its content.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Sawyer v. Coleman

    245 Ga. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 12, 2000

    This requirement that plaintiff show a clearly established right is a strenuous one: For the law to be clearly established to the point that qualified immunity does not apply, the law must have earlier been developed in such … In establishing that a right is clearly established so as to overcome a claim of qualified immunity, a plaintiff must rely upon specific, supporting case law: General propositions have little to do with the concept of qualified

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Rivera

    658 F.3d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 23, 2011

    qualifies as a predi- cate offense. … “Our purpose is to determine whether documentation or judicially noticeable facts clearly establish that the defendant pleaded guilty to facts covered by the predicate offense.” Id. at 968.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Roberto Lopez Valencia v. Loretta E. Lynch, 798 F.3d 863 (2015)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Randy Cole v. Michael Hunter

    905 F.3d 334 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 25, 2018

    of the unlawfulness of his or her conduct. 16 The officer is entitled to qualified immunity if there is no violation, or if the conduct did not violate law clearly established at the time. 17 12 136 S. … established law. 21 We will not revisit the first part of the qualified immunity inquiry in connection with any of the Coles’ claims, nor the question of clearly established law as regards the Coles’ Fourteenth Amendment

    Overruled on other grounds by Randy Cole v. Michael Hunter, 935 F.3d 444 (2019)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • McClelland v. Katy Indep Sch Dist

    63 F.4th 996 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 31, 2023

    Whether McClelland’s free speech rights were clearly established “A Government official’s conduct violates clearly established law when, at the time of the challenged conduct, ‘[t]he contours … established so as to defeat qualified immunity for Hull. 2.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • George Nicholas Parsons v. Wiley Tyler Raines and Calhoun County Commission

    Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · May 28, 2025

    Generally stated, qualified immunity shields a government official performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when the official’s conduct does not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional … Like the circuit court, we see no facts in the petitioner’s complaint demonstrating how the deputy violated a clearly established constitutional right.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Hallum

    2010 Ark. App. 193 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 24, 2010

    Toward this end, police officers have qualified immunity from liability in their individual capacity unless they violate a clearly established right of which a reasonable person would know. Harlow v. … A motion for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity is precluded only when the plaintiff has asserted a constitutional violation, demonstrated that the constitutional right is clearly established, and raised a genuine

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Long v. Norris

    929 F.2d 1111 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 3, 1991

    Thus, we venture once more into the labyrinth of deciding what makes a right “clearly established” for purposes of qualified immunity. In Mitchell v. … established at the time of the searches for purposes of qualified immunity.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Janet Virgili v. Michelle Gilbert, John Morrison, and Joseph Masi, 272 F.3d 391 (2001)Cited 82 timesPublished
  • Talley v. Brentwood Union Free School District

    728 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2010

    Qualified Immunity in General “Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or … “[E]ven where the law is ‘clearly established’ and the scope of an official’s permissible conduct is ‘clearly defined,’ the qualified immunity defense also protects an official if it was ‘objectively reasonable’ for him at

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.