Case law

Adams v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

174 Mo. App. 5 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1913

[Byrne v. Boadle (1863), 2 H. & C. (Exch.) 725; Briggs v. Oliver (1866), 4 H. & C. (Exch.) 407.] “Thus it was held in Mooney v. … [Donahue v. Brown (1891) 154 Mass. 21 . “Many other illustrations might be cited were it necessary.

City of St. Louis v. Niehaus

236 Mo. 8 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1911

There are respectable authorities back of our holding — ex gr.: Nagle v. U. S., 145 Fed. I. c. 306; The E. A. Packer, 140 U. S. l. c. 367-8; U. S. v. Bedgood, 49 Fed. 54 ; Hensley v. Tarpey, 7 Cal. 288 ; Moore v. … , J., in Hunter v.

Wheless v. City of St. Louis

96 F. 865 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Oct 11, 1899

the levee board. … Counsel for complainants rely specially upon the cases of Davies v. Corbin, 112 U. S. 36 , 5 Sup. Ct. 4, and Brown v. Trousdale, 138 U. S. 389 , 11 Sup. Ct. 308.

State ex rel. Frazer v. Seibel

262 Mo. 220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 1914

BROWN, J. (concurring). — I concur in the views expressed in the majority opinion by our learned Chief Justice, but there is another issue tendered by respondent’s return which should not be passed over in silence. … [People ex rel. v. Board of Election Comrs., 221 Ill. l. c. 21-23.]

Americans United v. Rogers

538 S.W.2d 711 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 26, 1976

City of Joplin v. Industrial Commission of Missouri, Mo., 329 S.W.2d 687, 692 [6]; Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160, 167 [8]; State on inf. Dalton v. Metropolitan St. … J., from Everson v.

St. George's Church Society v. Branch

120 Mo. 226 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1894

In the case of McFerran, Shallcross & Co. v. … Garretson v. Brown, 26 N. J. L. 425; McFerran, Shallcross & Co. v. Davis, supra. We think that the judgment should he affirmed and it is so ordered. All of this division concur.

Homm v. Gardner

267 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 8, 1967

Compare Butler v. Folsom, W.D. Ark., 1958, 167 F.Supp. 684, 689 . [ 316 F.2d 506 ]. When one compares Butler v. … Butler v. Flemming, 5 Cir., 1961, 288 F.2d 591, 595 ; Hayes v. Celebrezze, 5 Cir. 1963, 311 F.2d 648 . [311 F.2d at 762].

Kinnard v. Plastics Moulding Co.

360 S.W.2d 340 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1962

and then dust the residue off of the board. … Plaintiff’s evidence was that she worked with two different plastic powders, one a white powder and the other a black or brown powder.

Ruble v. American River Transp. Co.

799 F. Supp. 2d 1017 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 29, 2011

In his deposition, plaintiff testified to his conversation with the chief engineer, Will Brown, upon boarding the John H: [QUESTION]: When did you speak to Mr. Brown? [ANSWER]: Five minutes after getting on the boat. … Brown and what did he say to you?

State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Falkenhainer

321 Mo. 1042 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1929

Brown v. Klein, 116 Mo. 259 , l. c. 268, that the statute does not require a contested election ease to be ‘ ‘ at issue ’ ’ when an order to open the ballot boxes is made. … Ponath v. Hamilton, 240 S.

State ex rel. Marbury v. Tullock

108 Mo. App. 32 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1904

Att., secs. 2 and 3; Brown, Jurisdiction (2 Ed.), p. 154, sec. 26c. Certiorari is the proper procedure in such instances. Railroad v. Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 1 . c. 308; Railroad v. Young, 96 Mo. 39 , 8 S. … W. 766 ; State ex rel. v. Cooper County Court, 66 Mo. App. 97 ; State ex rel. v. Smith, 101 Mo. 174 , 14 S. W. 108 .

Opinion No. (1986)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 1986

Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 267 , 165 S.W.2d 657 , 662 (banc 1942). … Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, 296 S.W.2d 492 , 487-488 (Mo. banc 1956). In Barnes v. Bailey, No. 67631 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 2-19-86) (may be subject to motion for rehearing) and Payne v.

City of St. Louis v. Wall

235 Mo. App. 9 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1939

[Shirley v. Brown, 80 Mo. 244 ; Bruce v. Vogel, 38 Mo. 100 ; Bradley v. Heffernan, 156 Mo. 653 , 57 S.W. 763 ; Hartle v. Peterman, 107 Mo. 355 , 17 S.W. 894 .] … [Strawbridge v. Clark, 52 Mo. 21 .]

Thieret Family, LLC. v. Delta Plains Services, LLC, and Justin A. Brown, Adam Horton and Mike Still, Defendants/Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 2021

Verni v. … (citing High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 823 S.W.2d 493, 495 (Mo. banc 1992)).

Campbell v. Aunt Jemima Mills Co.

211 Mo. App. 670 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1922

Plaintiff looked in the cupboard for it but none was there and he so told Brown the engineer, who was the only other person on the premises. Brown said “I have one here in my desk; I will fix it up for you.” … [Obermeyer v. Logeman Chair Co., 229 Mo. 97 ; Harrison v. Kansas City, etc., Light Co., 195 Mo. 606, 623 ; Hawkins v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 170 S. W. 459 .]

State ex rel. Houck v. Lesueur

145 Mo. 322 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1898

This is an original proceeding in this court commenced by relator, Louis Houck, owner of a majority of the stock in the three following named railway companies, to wit: Brown wood & Northwestern Railroad Company; Cape Q-irardeau … State ex rel. v. Railroad, 99 Mo. 41 ; Railroad v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 301 ; Evans v. Railroad, 106 Mo. 594 . The peremptory writ is denied. G-antt, O.

State ex inf. Crow v. Vallins

140 Mo. 523 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1897

Att’y-Gen. v. Bus (1896) 135 Mo. 325 ( 36 S. W. … Brown v. Russell (1896) 166 Mass. 14 (43 N. E. Rep. 1005). And he must possess the qualifications as to residence which the Constitution demands of the incumbent of “any office in this State.’’ State ex rel. v.

Mayne v. Kansas City Railways Co.

287 Mo. 235 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 7, 1921

Some of those persons immediately boarded the car. It was then announced by the conductor in charge that the car would not go on west. Such passengers as had boarded the car got off. … [Brown v. Hannibal St. Joe Ry. Co., 99 Mo. 310 , l.c. 319; Wingate v. Bunton, 193 Mo. App. 470 ; Maguire v. St. Louis Transit Co., 103 Mo. App. 476 .]

Barks v. Turnbeau

573 S.W.2d 677 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1978

Quoting Bowers v. … Gantt v. Brown, 238 Mo. 560 , 142 S.W. 422 (1911). “. . . (W)hether the fraud alleged in an election contest be actual or legal is immaterial and the consequence is the same.” Elliott v. Hogan, supra, at 849.

Four B. Corp. and Harrisonville Marketplace II, LLC v. City of Harrisonville, Missouri Board of Zoning Adjustments

Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2023

Vandenboom v. … "An applicant appealing the denial of a [] permit has 'the burden of proof before the Board[.]'" Dailey v. Bd. of Adjustment, 455 S.W.3d 97, 99 (Mo. App. S.D. 2014) (quoting Drury Displays, Inc. v.