Case law

Wilson Miller v. . Derr

69 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873

Smith v. Brown, 3 Hawks, -580. Having introduced it, we know no reason why they were not at liberty to show what it contained when given, and that some words had since been obliterated. … Matthis v. Matthis, 3 D. & B., 60; Dunn v. Clements, 7 Jones, 58 .

Willoughby v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

121 N.C. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 1996

Specifically, the Board made the following pertinent conclusions of law: 4. … Respondent argues that the Board’s interpretation of G.S. 135-106(b) was correct and therefore that the trial court did not err in affirming the Board’s final decision. We disagree.

Carter v. N. C. State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors

86 N.C. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

Wiseman v. Wiseman, 68 N.C. App. 252 , 314 S.E. 2d 566 (1984). … Sutton v. Figgatt, supra. The substantive grounds for granting the relief requested as developed under former practice still control. Fleming v. Mann, 23 N.C. App. 418 , 209 S.E. 2d 366 (1974).

Cohoon v. . Harrell

180 N.C. 39 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1920

Oil Co. v. Burney, 174 N. C., 382 ; Riddick v. Dunn, 145 N. C., 31 ; Brown v. Atkinson, 91 N. C., 389 ; 17 Corpus Juris, 492, et seq.; Lawson on Presumptive Evidence, pp. 16-17; Anson on Contracts, p. 328. … Brantley, the purchaser of the timber, was to the effect that in the contract of sale, which was in parol, plaintiff sold to Brantley “all merchantable timber to be cut from the Simmons place at $9 per thousand feet, board

Parker v. Wilson

247 N.C. 47 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1957

There was a dent in the instrument board near the center and blood and brown hair imbedded. Miss Patrick had brown hair. Wilson’s hair was black.

Dixie Poster Advertising Co. v. City of Asheville

189 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1925

Cohen v. Comrs., 77 N. C., 2 ; Wardens v. Washington, 109 N. C., 21 ; Scott v. Smith, 121 N. C., 94 ; Paul v. Washington, 134 N. C., 363 ; Hargett v. Bell, ibid., 394; S. v. R. R., 145 N. C., 495, 521 ; Thompson v. … Justice Hoke in Turner v. New Bern, supra, and tbe concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Brown in R. R. v. Goldsboro, 155 N. C., 365 .

Cubbage v. Board of Trustees of the Endowment Fund of NC State University

367 N.C. 777 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 2014

Burton v. NCNB Nat. Bank of North Carolina

85 N.C. App. 702 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1987

See Scott v. Veneer Co., 240 N.C. 73 , 81 S.E. 2d 146 (1954) (statement made in a judicial pleading); Jarman v. … We do not find, in the words of Scott v.

Steele v. Surry County

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 25, 2010

Fields v. Tompkins-Johnston Plumbing Co ., 224 N.C. 841 , 842-843 , 32 S.E.2d 623 , 624 (1945). … Dillingham v. Yeargin Constr. Co ., 320 N.C. 499 , 358 S.E.2d 380 (1987). 3.

McKinney v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE CO.

64 N.C. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1983

Consumers Power v. Power Co., 285 N.C. 434, 437 , 206 S.E. 2d 178, 181 , reh’g denied, 286 N.C. 547 (1974). See also Waters v. … As was the case in Waters v.

Walker v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System

348 N.C. 63 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1998

Walker v. Board of Trustees of the N.C. Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement Sys., 127 N.C. App. 156 , 487 S.E.2d 839 (1997). … See Pritchett v.

Griffin v. Board of Commissioners of the Law Enforcement Officers' Benefit & Retirement Fund

84 N.C. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1987

The letter also stated that the fund’s medical board was of the opinion that his condition could improve to the point of him being able to again perform the duties of a law enforcement officer, and that his status would be … In the meantime, on 24 June 1980, the General Assembly amended G.S. 143-166(y) to require the defendant board to determine whether disability retirees were gainfully employed and to reduce the benefits of those that were

Bardolph v. Arnold

112 N.C. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1993

Brown v. Walker, 188 N.C. 52 , 123 S.E. 633 (1924), involved the town of Sylva’s appropriation of $5,000.00 to a trustee for the purchase of rights-of-way for the construction of a railroad, while Moore v. … Horne v. Chafin, 62 N.C.

State v. Squire

292 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1977

That being true, it was not error for the judge to admit testimony as to the statement by the defendant Brown without making the specific finding that she had waived her right to counsel. State v. … State v. Fox, 274 N.C. 277 , 163 S.E. 2d 492 (1968). The statement by Squire did not refer to the defendant Brown, directly or indirectly.

State v. Cooper

275 N.C. 283 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1969

Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 413 , that the evidence was insufficient to support a verdict of guilty of the criminal offense charged in the indictment. … State v. Hicks, 233 N.C. 31 , 62 S.E. 2d 497 , and cases cited; State v. Keziah, 258 N.C. 52 , 127 S.E. 2d 784 ; State v. Kimball, 261 N.C. 582 , 135 S.E. 2d 568 . In State v.

Coble v. . Comrs.

184 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922

The act construed in Brown v. Comrs. , 173 N.C. 600 , was obviously intended to create a taxing district for road purposes, and the power of the Legislature to enact it was upheld. This case was affirmed in Mills v. … Comrs. , 175 N.C. 215 ; Parvin v. Comrs. , 177 N.C. 508 ; Comrs. v. Pruden , 178 N.C. 394 ; Martin County v. Bank , 178 N.C. 26 ; Comrs. v. Bank , 178 N.C. 170 . See, also, Board of Trustees v. Webb , 155 N.C. 379 .

Deal v. Enon Sanitary District

245 N.C. 74 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1956

Arey v. Lemons, 232 N.C. 531 , 61 S.E. 2d 596 ; Cameron v. Highway Com., 188 N.C. 84 , 123 S.E. 465 . … Tarboro v. Forbes, 185 N.C. 59 , 116 S.E. 81 ; Armstrong v. Beaman, supra; Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N.C. 435 , 81 S.E. 611 ; Shelton v. White, supra; McQuillin’s Municipal Corp., 1921 Supp., sec. 1858.”

Greensboro v. . Guilford County and School Dist.

209 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1936

These schools were not established, maintained, or operated by the Board of Commissioners or by the Board of Education of Guilford County. … by said Board of Education, under statutory authority.

Reddish v. Roberts

460 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 1978

Brown v. Brannon, 535 F.2d 1249 , No. 75-2111 (4th Cir. 1976) (Table). … Brown v. Brannon, supra (slip opinion at 2). In Hogge , the court considered the constitutionality of an ordinance prohibiting massage by a person of the opposite sex.

Farris v. Southern Railway Co.

151 N.C. 483 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1909

Bradley v. Railroad, 126 N. C., 735 ; Brown v. Railroad, 32 N. Y., 597 ; Falener v. Railroad, 68 Miss., 355 ; Railroad v. Summers, 68 Miss., 566 ; French v. Railroad, 116 Mass., 537 ; Railroad v. … Crossing at this point enabled the employees to reach their homes and boarding places more quickly and to return to their work *489 ‘more promptly.