Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
8.03s
324 Mo. 1245 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 7, 1930
App. 255 ; Osborn v. Emery, 51 Mo. App. 408 ; Gill v. Reed, 55 Mo. App. 246 ; Haeberle v. O’Day, 61 Mo. App. 391 ; Chick v. Frey Coal Co., 78 Mo. App. 234 ; Frissell v. Williams, 87 Mo. App. 518 ; Waggoner v. … In Glen v.
Cited 9 timesPublished71 Mo. App. 503 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1897
Hair Co. v. Walmsley, 32 Mo. App. 115 ; Pearson v. Carson, 69 Mo. 550 ; Fruin v. Railway Co., 89 Mo. 397 ; Morgan v. Porter, 103 Mo. 135 . … Brum v. Brown, 33 S. W. Rep. 145 . The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. All concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished673 S.W.2d 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1984
After everyone boarded, he started the engine. The craft went about fifteen feet and then the engine died. … Brown v. Thomas, 316 S.W.2d 234, 237 (Mo.App.1958). See Wehrman v. Liberty Petroleum Co. Inc., 382 S.W.2d 56, 65 (Mo.App.1964).
Cited 12 timesPublishedKammerer v. Missouri Valley College
327 S.W.2d 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1959
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 126 N.J.Eq. 406, 9 A.2d 311 , loc. cit. 330. … In Presbyterian Orphanage of Missouri v. Fitterling, 342 Mo. 299 , 114 S.W.2d 1004 , Citizens’ Bank of Lancaster v. Foglesong, 326 Mo. 581 , 31 S.W.2d 778 , and Cook v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedColonial Trust Co. v. McMillan
188 Mo. 547 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1905
Springs Electric Railway Company, hereinafter called the Brown Springs Company. … [Butler Co. v. Bank, 143 Mo. 13 ; Comer v. Statham, 173 Mo. 246 .]
Cited 9 timesPublished486 S.W.2d 468 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972
State, 3 Md.App. 563 , 240 A.2d 332 ; Brown v. Heyd, E.D.La., 277 F.Supp. 899 . … Sperling v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Cir., 426 F.2d 1161, 1164 [5]. See also Brown v. Kearney, 5 Cir., 355 F.2d 199, 200 ; Martin v. United States, 4 Cir., 183 F.2d 436, 439 ; United States v. Hallman, 3 Cir., 365 F.2d 289, 291 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedBlake H. Donaldson, D.O. v. Missouri State Board of Registration for The Healing Arts
Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2020
(citation omitted); see Stone v. Mo. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished269 Mo. 334 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1916
V. Wills, W. V. … Brown, G., concurs. PER CURIAM: The foregoing opinion of Bailey, C., is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur, except Woodson, J., not sitting.
Cited 13 timesPublished121 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1894
Franz v. Hilterbrand, 45 Mo. 121 ; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 536 ; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 152 ; Parsons v. Railroad, 94 Mo. 286 . II. … The jury were not advised whether he contributed to the support of the family, or whether he lived with his parents or boarded.
Cited 22 timesPublished242 S.W.3d 418 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2007
The Board did not vote on the Original Bill at this meeting. The Board held another meeting on October 1, 2001. … Compton Co. v. Walter, 324 Mo. 290 , 23 S.W.2d 167, 170 (Mo.1929). See also, Cunningham v. City of Butler, 256 S.W.2d 767 (Mo.1953); Frago v.
Cited 6 timesPublished350 S.W.2d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1961
Burroughs v. Lasswell, 336 Mo. 463 , 79 S.W.2d 107 ; Dille v. St. Luke’s Hospital, 355 Mo. 436 , 196 S.W.2d 615 ; Nydegger v. Mason, Mo., 315 S.W.2d 816 ; Page v. Laclede Gas Light Co., Mo., 245 S.W.2d 23 ; Burke v. … McClure v.
Cited 38 timesPublished265 Mo. 556 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1915
[Glavey v. United States, 182 U. S. 595 ; Bates v. St. Louis, 153 Mo. 18 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 153 Mo. 194 ; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 245 Mo. 12 ; Grant v. Rochester, 79 App. Div. (N. Y.) 460, 175 N. … The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion .of the court. All the .judges concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished357 S.W.2d 120 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1962
State v. Whitaker, supra; State v. Brown, Mo., 291 S.W.2d 615 . … State v. Denison, 352 Mo. 572 , 178 S.W.2d 449 ; State v. Rutledge, supra.
Cited 23 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 2014
Ellis v. Brown, 33 S.W.2d 104, 107 (Mo. banc 1930) (quoting 25 R. C. L. … Brown, 33 S.W.2d at 107 (quoting 25 R. C. L. Sec. 14 pp. 766, 767); see also Hopkins, 302 S.W.2d at 53; State ex rel. Rogersville Reorganized School Dist. No. R-4, of Webster Cnty., v.
Cited 0 timesPublished356 Mo. 1043 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 13, 1947
In State ex rel. v. Corneli the county court was not acting judicially, but as a board of equalization and jurisdiction of such boards must affirmatively appear. … At the time the deed was executed title to the abandoned railroad property had reverted to the owner of the abutting land at the time of the abandonment, [Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.
Cited 8 timesPublishedKane v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
251 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1913
[Dunphy v. Stock Yards Co., 118 Mo. App. 1 . c. 516; Trigg v. Ozark Co., 187 Mo. 227 ; Goransson v. Mfg. Co., 186 Mo. 300 .]” In Beebe v. … J., .Graves, Walker and Paris, JJ., concur; Wood-son, J., concurs in all but the order remanding, in a separate opinion; Brown and Bond, JJ., dissent, and vote for affirmance in a small sum, in a separate opinion by Brown
Cited 19 timesPublished173 Mo. 421 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 20, 1903
No reference was made to the decision in Pool v. Brown wbicb bad necessarily become a rule of property. … [Sturgeon v. Hampton, 88 Mo. 210 ; Pool v. Brown, 98 Mo. 681 .]
Cited 29 timesPublished493 S.W.3d 865 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 2016
As we have explained above, in Brown v. … As we have explained above, in Brown v.
Cited 16 timesPublished276 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 16, 1918
BROWN, C. … [Hurt v. Salisbury, 55 Mo. 310 ; Richardson v. Pitts, 71 Mo. 128 ; Martin v. Fewell, 79 Mo. 1 . c. 411; Hyatt v. Van Riper, 105 Mo. App. 664 ; Glenn v. Bergmann, 20 Mo. App. 343 ; Davidson v. Hobson, 59 Mo. App. 130 .]
Cited 29 timesPublished568 S.W.3d 898 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2019
The members are elected on a rotating basis so that one board seat is filled via election every two years. Voters will elect one board member in the April 2, 2019 general election. … Standard of Review The standard set forth in Murphy v. Carron’ governs our review. Wright-Jones v. Johnson, 256 $.W.3d 177, 180 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna