Case law

Campbell v. Board of Education of the Catawba County School Administrative Unit

76 N.C. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 1985

Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 533 , 180 S.E. 2d 823, 829 (1971); see also Lee v. Shor, 10 N.C. App. 231, 233 , 178 S.E. 2d 101, 103 (1970). … Conner Co. v. Spanish Inns, 294 N.C. 661, 675 , 242 S.E. 2d 785, 793 (1978).

Barden v. Murphy-Brown Holdings, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 2023

ORDER MURPHY-BROWN LLC, and SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC., ) Defendants. On December 30, 2022, defendants Murphy-Brown LLC (“Murphy-Brown”) and Smithfield Foods, Inc. … McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, 980 F.3d 937, 960 (4th Cir. 2020). Plaintiffs’ expert used “a DNA indicator called Pig2bac to show the presence of fecal material as a proxy for odor leaving the farm.” Id.

Snipes v. Norfolk & Southern Railroad

144 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1907

The relative rights and duties of persons, who are either on or in the act of boarding a street car, and the employees of the company, have been so recently and clearly discussed and stated by this Court in Clark v. … Justice Brown cites the authorities and draws the conclusions therefrom, that we do not deem it necessary to do more than refer to the opinion, and apply the law to the facts of this case. *21 His Honor instructed tbe jury

State v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

359 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 2005

Trust Certification Board, Inc. … Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.), and Lorillard Tobacco Company (herein “respondentappellees”) responses thereto, filed 12 January 2005, the Court orders as follows: 1.

Alston v. Hueske

244 N.C. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 2016

See Brown v. Kindred Nursing Ctrs. East, LLC, 364 N.C. 76, 80, 692 S.E.2d 87, 89–90 (2010). In its discretion, the trial court may allow a motion to extend the statute of limitations for up to 120 days. N.C. Gen. … Brown at 80, 692 S.E.2d at 90. The extension may not be used to amend a previously filed complaint in order for it to comply with the 9(j) requirement. Id.

Martin v. Board of Trustees of Leaksville Township Public School District

199 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1930

S. v. Guertin, 130 A. S. R., 610; Trustees of Vernon Soc. v. Hills, 16 A. D., 429; Treasurer of State v. Mann, 80 A. D., 688; Quitman Oil Co. v. Peacock, 81 S. E. (Ga.), 908. … As was said in Burns v. McGregor, 90 N.

Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of Wilmington

235 N.C. 597 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1952

Mandamus is a writ issuing from a court of competent jurisdiction commanding an inferior tribunal, board, corporation, or person to perform a purely ministerial duty imposed by law. … The party seeking such writ must have a clear legal right to demand it, and the tribunal, board, corporation, or person must be under a present, clear, legal duty to perform the act sought to be enforced. Hospital v.

Swan Beach Corolla, L.L.C. v. County of Currituck

234 N.C. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2014

See 4 See, e.g., Application of Campsites Unlimited, Inc., 287 N.C. 493, 215 S.E.2d 73 (1975), Browning-Ferris Industries Of South Atlantic, Inc. v. Guilford County Bd. of Adjustment, 126 N.C. … Lee v. Board of Adjustment of City of Rocky Mount, 226 N.C. 107, 111, 37 S.E.2d 128, 132 (1946).

Board of Trustees of Plymouth Graded School District v. Pruden & Co.

179 N.C. 617 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1920

Comrs. v. Malone, ante, 10. … Comrs. v. Malone, supra.

Shelton v. . White

163 N.C. 90 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1913

BROWN, J., did not sit and took no part in the decision of this case. … BROWN, J., did not sit and took no part in the decision of this case. Cited: Parker v. Johnson, ante , 75; Griffin v. Comrs. , 169 N.C. 644 ; Banks v. Lane , 170 N.C. 16 ; Drainage District v.

Virginia-Carolina Farms Co. v. Board of Drainage Commissioners

178 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919

Sanderlin v. Lukens, 152 N. C., 738 ; Newby v. Drainage Dist., 163 N. C., 24 ; Shelton v. White, 163 N. C., 90 ; In re Big Cold Water D. D., 162 N. C., 127 ; Banks v. Lane, 170 N. C., 14 ; Banks v. Lane, 171 N. … It is provided expressly that “after the district shall have been established, and the board of drainage commissioners appointed, it shall be the duty of the board of drainage commissioners to refund to each of the petitioners

Hearne v. Stanly County

188 N.C. 45 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 21, 1924

Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., 515 ; Houser v. Bonsal, 149 N. C., 51 . In R. R. v. Reid, 187 N. … Brown v. R. R., post, 52; Burgin v. Smith, 151 N. C., 561 . For the reasons stated, defendants are entitled to a new trial of the cause, and it is so ordered. New trial.

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP v. North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners

360 N.C. 399 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2006

Lambeth v. Town of Kure Beach

157 N.C. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2003

Respondents rely upon Davis v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 41 N.C. … See Russell v. Guilford County, 100 N.C. App. 541, 545 , 397 S.E.2d 335, 337 (1990); . . . The burden is on the landowner to prove each of the above four elements. Browning-Ferris Industries v.

Baker v. N.C. Psychology Bd.

819 S.E.2d 415 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2018

McGladrey & Pullen, Llp v. North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners

627 S.E.2d 461 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2006

State v. Isaacs

261 N.C. App. 696 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2018

The Board -4-  STATE V. … Brown v. City of Winston- Salem, 176 N.C. App. 497, 505, 626 S.E.2d 747, 753 (2006) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). V.

Heritage Pointe Builders, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board of General Contractors

120 N.C. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1995

The trial court vacated the Board’s decision and remanded the case for a rehearing, consistent with its order. Because the order requires further action to settle the controversy, it is interlocutory, Veazey v. … Goldston v. American Motors Corp., 326 N.C. 723, 726 , 392 S.E.2d 735, 736 (1990); see also J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc., 88 N.C.

Town of Tarboro v. Forbes

185 N.C. 59 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1923

Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo., 545 ; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. … Corp., sec. 1402, and note; Ziegler v. Hopkins, 117 U. S., 683 ; Ogden v. Armstrong, 168 U. S., 236 ; Holland v. Baltimore, 11 Md., 186 ; Greensboro v. McAdoo, 112 N. C., 359 ; Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N. C., 438 .

Charter School

665 S.E.2d 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 23, 2008

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of July 2008 by NC School Boards for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief: "Motion Allowed.