Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

346 Pa. 192 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1942

In the case of Com. v. … S. v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

438 Pa. 52 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1970

In Commonwealth v. … In Commonwealth v.

Brown v. Caldwell

10 Serg. & Rawle 114 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1823

Zouch v. Parsons, 3 Burr. 1807. … The reasons are fully studied in Mather v. The Ministers of Trinity Church, 3 Serg. & Rawle, 509, and Baker v. Howell, 6 Serg. & Rawle, 416 .

Brown v. White

202 Pa. 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1902

“We do not doubt,” said Gordon, J., in Knauss v. … To the same effect are Fow v. Roberts, 108 Pa. *312 489 , Wunder v. McLean, 134 Pa. 334 , and Reading City v. Reiner, 167 Pa. 41 .

Commonwealth v. Brown

31 Pa. Commw. 620 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1977

Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr., Larry Miles Brown (Appellee) was arrested on March 4,1974, and again on March 8,1974, for driving while his license was under suspension. … Commonwealth v. James, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 493, 497 , 296 A.2d 530, 532 (1972); Commonwealth v. Lamb, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 508, 510-11 , 316 A.2d 148, 149 (1974).

Commonwealth v. Brown

225 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1973

Brown, was indicted for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor and for involuntary manslaughter resulting from an accident. … In Commonwealth v. Kallus, 212 Pa.

Smith v. Brown

3 Binn. 201 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1810

The rule of this court has been, since the case of Millar v. Hall, to discharge on common bail, unless the state,-under which the discharge was given, refuses to extend the same courtesy to the citizens of this state.

Commonwealth v. Brown

467 Pa. 512 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1976

Brown’s counsel requested neither a mistrial nor curative instructions and the Commonwealth’s summation continued. Under the circumstances, the issue is waived. Commonwealth v. … Glenn, 459 Pa, 662, 330 A.2d 535 *518 (1974); Rule 1118 of Pa.R.Crim.P. 5 Here, as in Glenn , Brown has been granted all that he had requested. See also Commonwealth v.

Brown v. Brown

1 Pa. D. & C. 173 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jul 2, 1921

In Liem v. … In Kuhn v. Kuhn. 65 Pitts. L.

Brown v. Hahn

419 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1965

Brown and Helen M. Brown, his wife (Browns), were high bidders at the auction both on the individual parcels and on the entirety. … The auctioneer “knocked down” the properties to Browns, Browns tendered the required deposit but Hahns refused the tender and stated that they would not sell to Browns.

Commonwealth v. Brown

220 Pa. Super. 704 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1971

Commonwealth v. Brown

473 Pa. 458 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1977

Brown attempts to distinguish Commonwealth v. … Ashe v. Swenson, supra, relied upon by both Brown and the trial court, is inapplicable to the instant circumstances.

Brown v. Unger

269 Pa. 471 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1921

pleadings, and considering the able argument of counsel for appellants, we cannot say it is “clear and free from doubt” that the court below erred in refusing judgment; following the usual course pursued in such cases (Wilson v.

Shoemaker v. State Employes' Retirement Board

688 A.2d 751 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1997

Wingert v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 138 Pa.Cmwlth. 48 , 589 A.2d 269 (1991). Petitioner cannot meet her burden of proof by mere conjecture or by merely advancing possible hypotheses. Anschel v. … As the ultimate finder of fact, the Board may take notice of its own records. Christiana v.

Brown v. George

344 Pa. 399 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1942

Justice Stern, In this action the statement of claim alleged that the wife plaintiff was in the act of boarding a streetcar when the motorman closed the doors prematurely, pinioning her between them. … A motion for judgment n. o. v. must be based upon pleadings and evidence and not upon arguments made by counsel to the jury: see Plummer v. Hillside Coal & Iron Co., 96 Pa. Superior Ct. 180, 184 .

Brown v. Ridgway

10 Pa. 42 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1848

The true reason why error does not lie in foreign attachment, was given by Chief Justice Tilghman, in Lewis v. Wallick. … When, however, an attachment is dissolved because it issued irregularly, as where the property was not a subject of foreign attachment, the proceeding is at an end for every purpose, as it was in Miller v.

Brown v. Jones

404 Pa. 513 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1961

In Good v. … Brown crossed between intersections would not of itself declare Mrs. Brown an imprudent person. In Shuman v.

Caldwell v. Brown

53 Pa. 453 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1867

In Gilman v. … In Albro v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

436 Pa. 423 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1970

As appellant points out, to do so would mean overruling Commonwealth v. Walters, supra, and its progeny. See Commonwealth v. Minnick, 436 Pa. 42 , 258 A. 2d 515 (1969); Commonwealth v. … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

701 A.2d 252 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1997

Commonwealth v. Montalvo, 434 Pa.Super. 14, 31, 641 A.2d 1176 (1994) citing Commonwealth v. Smith, 414 Pa.Super. 208 , 606 A.2d 939 (1992). … However, most recently in Commonwealth v.