Case law

State v. Crews

286 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

In plain view was only a brown bottle containing pills. The bottle itself was not contraband. … See Coolidge v.

North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission

768 F. Supp. 2d 818 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 3, 2011

Indeed, in South Carolina State Board of Dentistry v. … Co. v.

Pinewood Manor Mobile Homes, Inc. v. North Carolina Manufactured Housing Board

84 N.C. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1987

Petitioner contends that the trial court erred in granting the Board’s motion to dismiss pursuant to the provisions of N.C.G.S. § 150A. We do not agree. … In Ready Mix Concrete v. Sales Corp., 36 N.C. App. 778 , 245 S.E. 2d 234 (1978), this Court stated that “[u]nder G.S. 1A-1, Rule 3, an action is commenced when a complaint is filed or when a summons is issued.” 36 N.C.

Deans v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

152 N.C. 171 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1910

Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 109 N. C., 527 ; Lewis v. Tel. Co., 117 N. C., 436 ; Cigar Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 348 ; Watch Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 351 .” … This position is met by the *173 ■eases of Sherrill v. Tel. Co., 109 N. C., 527 , and Cigar Co. v. Express Co., 120 N. C., 348 .

Lamar Oci South Corporation v. Stanly County Zoning Board of Adjustment

659 S.E.2d 734 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

659 S.E.2d 734 (2008) LAMAR OCI SOUTH CORPORATION, d/b/a Lamar Advertising of Asheville v. STANLY COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and Stanly County. No. 485A07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 6, 2008.

Lacy v. . Bank

183 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1922

Board of Education v. Board of Comrs. , 178 N.C. 305 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs. , 174 N.C. 469 ; Collie v. Comrs. , 145 N.C. 170 . … Cited: Coble v. Comrs. , 184 N.C. 355 ; Provision Co. v. Davies , 190 N.C. 13 ; Henderson v. Wilmington , 191 N.C. 279 ; Tate v. Bd. of Ed. , 192 N.C. 520 ; Frazier v. Comrs. , 194 N.C. 62 ; Owens v.

Monsour v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

5 N.C. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1969

In Freeman v. … Campbell v. ABC Board, 263 N.C. 224 , 139 S.E. 2d 197 ; Thomas v. ABC Board, 258 N.C. 513 , 128 S.E. 2d 884 .

County Board of Education of Guilford County v. City of High Point

213 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1938

This section was passed upon by this Court in S. v. Maultsby, 139 N.

County of Buncombe v. Wood

216 N.C. 224 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 27, 1939

The cases of Wright v. Westbrook, 121 N. C., 155 ; Stroud v. Morrow, 52 N. C., 463 ; Little v. Bennett, 58 N. C., 156 ; Gifford v. Choate, 100 Mass., 343 ; and Barford v. … Brown of the power conferred upon her by the will defeats the limitation over to the children and passes the fee to the purchaser.” Mabry v. Brown, 162 N. C., 217 (221). The second item of the will of Lawrence H.

Nelson v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

26 N.C. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1975

Food Fair v. Henderson, 17 N.C. App. 335 , 194 S.E. 2d 213 . “Trade” refers to a business venture for profit. Smith v. County of Mecklenburg, 280 N.C. 497 , 187 S.E. 2d 67 . … Food Fair v. Henderson, supra. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed. Affirmed. Judges Britt and Parker concur.

Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of Wilmington

237 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1953

In Board of Health v. … See also Burleson v. Board of Aldermen, 200 N.C. 30 , 156 S.E. 241 . In Palmer v.

Phillips v. Interstate Land Co.

176 N.C. 514 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1918

Brown, J. This action is brought to recover on the following note: $2,000. Laurinburg, N. C., September 25, 1911. January 10, 1912, after date, we promise to pay to the order of M. M. … Watson v. Mfg. Co., 147 N. C., 475 ; Davis v. Ins. Co., 134 N. C., 60 ; Bank v. Oil Co., 157 N. C., 302 .

Hill v. Robeson County, NC

733 F. Supp. 2d 676 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 20, 2010

See, e.g., Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; see, e.g., City of Canton v.

State v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

359 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 2005

Trust Certification Board, Inc. … Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.), and Lorillard Tobacco Company (herein “respondentappellees”) responses thereto, filed 12 January 2005, the Court orders as follows: 1.

Moore v. Idealease of Wilmington

465 F. Supp. 2d 484 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 21, 2006

Jordahl v. Democratic Party of Va., 122 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir.1997); Brown & Root. Inc. v. Breckenridge, 211 F.3d 194, 199 (4th Cir.2000). … See Brown & Root, Inc., 211 F.3d at 199 ; Jordahl, 122 F.3d at 202 .

Snipes v. Norfolk & Southern Railroad

144 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1907

The relative rights and duties of persons, who are either on or in the act of boarding a street car, and the employees of the company, have been so recently and clearly discussed and stated by this Court in Clark v. … Justice Brown cites the authorities and draws the conclusions therefrom, that we do not deem it necessary to do more than refer to the opinion, and apply the law to the facts of this case. *21 His Honor instructed tbe jury

Hollingsworth v. . Skelding

142 N.C. 246 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1906

Boyce v. Anderson , 2 Pet., 150 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, supra .

Barden v. Murphy-Brown Holdings, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 2023

ORDER MURPHY-BROWN LLC, and SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC., ) Defendants. On December 30, 2022, defendants Murphy-Brown LLC (“Murphy-Brown”) and Smithfield Foods, Inc. … McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, 980 F.3d 937, 960 (4th Cir. 2020). Plaintiffs’ expert used “a DNA indicator called Pig2bac to show the presence of fecal material as a proxy for odor leaving the farm.” Id.

In Re Markham

259 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

Brown v. Terhune (N.J.), 18 A. 2d 73 . The New Jersey procedure as set forth in Payne v. Borough of Sea Bright (N.J.), 187 A. 627 , is approved in Eastern Boulevard Corporation v. … Board of Adjustment, supra; Chambers v. Board of Adjustment, 250 N.C. 194 , 198, 108 S.E. 2d 211 ; Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476, 480 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . The statute (G.S.

Mathis v. Manufacturing Co.

140 N.C. 530 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 13, 1906

Brown, J. At the conclusion of the evidence defendant moved to nonsuit the' plaintiff. The court overruled the motion and defendant excepted. … Kiser v. Barytes Co., 131 N. C., 610. While the accident to plaintiff’s band is to be lamented, we are unable to find in the record any evidence of negligence upon the part of defendant which caused the injury.