Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
8.26s
721 S.W.2d 794 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1986
In the five count petition Plaintiff Boeke sought relief against Williams and Overland; Brown sought relief against all three defendants. … Mason v. Williams Discount Center, Inc., 639 S.W.2d 836 (Mo.App.1982) [6]; Corcoran v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 572 S.W.2d 212 (Mo.App.1978) [3].
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnton v. St. Louis Suburban Newspapers, Inc.
598 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1980
Missouri Church of Scientology v. Adams, 543 S.W.2d at 777 . Plaintiff contends that the language of the article is directed toward him in his professional capacity. In Brown v. … Hudson v. Garner, 22 Mo. 423 (1856); Rail v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedDeatherage v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.
469 S.W.2d 660 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1971
Williams v. S. N. Long, supra. … Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co., Mo.App., 250 S.W.2d 803, 809 . We find that the award of the commission is supported by competent and *662 substantial evidence upon the whole record. The judgment is affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSchool District of Oakland v. School District of Joplin
340 Mo. 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937
[See Harrison v. Bridgeton (1819), 16 Mass. 15 , 17; Richardson v. Brown, (1830), 6 Greenl. (Me.) 355, 359.] The later case of Lynn v. … Board of Health of Buena Vista Township v.
Cited 26 timesPublished897 S.W.2d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995
Louis, Department of Public Utilities — Water Division (Water Division) and the Board of Police Commissioners (Board). … Brown v. City of St. Louis, 842 S.W.2d 163 [3] (Mo.App.E.D.1992).
Cited 3 timesPublished296 S.W.2d 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1956
As stated in Hertz v. … Combs v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState ex rel. McCleary v. Adcock
206 Mo. 550 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1907
[State ex rel. v. Goodier, 195 Mo. l. c. 560.] … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 .] If, perchance, through a misunderstanding of the law, the board should refuse to perform a given duty, the writ of mandamus will right the wrong. [State ex rel. v.
Cited 20 timesPublished519 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981
In Elrod v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 736 [ 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 ] (1974)." Branti, 445 U.S. at 527 , 100 S.Ct. at 1299 .
Cited 7 timesPublished99 Mo. App. 208 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903
S. 1899, sec. 5959; Sherrell v. Murray, 49 Mo. App. (St. L.) 233; McVey v. Barker, 92 Mo. App. (St. L.) 498. The ordinances enacted to carry out this charter power were valid and must be upheld and enforced.. … Spitler v. Young, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublished85 Mo. App. 477 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1900
Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo. App. 277 ; Moore v. Association, 74 Mo. App. 468 ; Price v. Association, 75 Mo. App. 551 ; Barnes v. Association, 83 Mo. App. 466 . … Star Association v. Woods, 100 Tenn. 121 ; B. & L. Ass’n v. Leonard, 74 Miss. 810 ; B. & L. Ass’n v. Shields, 71 Miss. 630 ; Patterson v. Association, 63 Ga. 373 ; Haight v. Association, 19 West Va. 792 ; Cox v.
Cited 6 timesPublished568 S.W.3d 443 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2018
Evans v. Brown Builders Elec. … In State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished240 Mo. 680 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1912
Mayor, etc. v. Sands, 105 N. … In Mayor, etc. v. Sands, 105 N.
Cited 13 timesPublishedSone ex rel. Road District No. 11 v. Wallendorp
187 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1905
At his annual settlement, the collector shall cause to be made and delivered to the clerk of the board of each road district a list of the names, properly sworn to, of all persons who have not paid, and are delinquent in, … [Weese v. Brown, 102 Mo. 299 ; Doggett v. Blanke, 70 Mo. App. 499 , and cases cited; Nutter v. Houston, 32 Mo. App. 451 .]
Cited 14 timesPublished156 S.W.3d 410 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2005
Brown v. Brown, 14 S.W.3d 704, 707 (Mo. App.2000). The burden of showing adverse tax consequences must be established with particularity at trial. Linton, 117 S.W.3d at 206 [24]. … At the time of trial, the "children” were both in college and Husband paid all expenses related thereto, including tuition and room and board.
Cited 7 timesPublished239 Mo. App. 118 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1945
[Brown v. Weare et al., 152 S. W. (2d) 649 ; Boyce v. Mo. Pac. R. R. Co., 168 Mo. 583 ; Kellog v. Malin, 50 Mo. 496 .] … [Brown v. Weare, supra.]
Cited 7 timesPublished100 Mo. App. 263 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1903
Louis, boarding at different places, sometimes under the name of Lloyd and sometimes under that of Davison. … Rowden v. Brown, 91 Mo. 429 .
Cited 18 timesPublished128 Mo. 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 1895
Manker v. Faulhaber, 94 Mo. 430 ; State v. Noland, 111 Mo. 484 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 113 Mo. 202 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383 . … Louis v.
Cited 26 timesPublished281 S.W.2d 580 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1955
The supreme court approved injunction to prevent a board of education and its superintendent of instruction from employing and dismissing teachers without legal authority in State ex rel. Brown v. … Board of Education of City of Duluth, 215 Minn. 590 , 11 N.W.2d 76 (supt. not a teacher); Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v.
Cited 15 timesPublished306 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 4, 1969
Following his appearance before the Board, plaintiff was again classified I-A. Upon appeal to the State Appeal Board, that board on April 14, 1969, classified plaintiff I-A. … Plaintiff argues, on the authority of Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 388 F.2d 973 , that the mere “review” of a Selective Service file of itself constitutes a reopening of a registrant’s classification.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPipes v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
267 Mo. 385 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1916
BROWN, C. … [Emerson v. Railway Co., 111 Mo. 161, 165 ; Lore v. Manufacturing Co., 160 Mo. 608, 621 ; McKenzie v. United Railways Co., 216 Mo. 1, 17 ; Railway Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 576 ; Railway Co. v. Gray, 237 U.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna