Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

8.26s

  • Boeke v. Williams

    721 S.W.2d 794 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1986

    In the five count petition Plaintiff Boeke sought relief against Williams and Overland; Brown sought relief against all three defendants. … Mason v. Williams Discount Center, Inc., 639 S.W.2d 836 (Mo.App.1982) [6]; Corcoran v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 572 S.W.2d 212 (Mo.App.1978) [3].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anton v. St. Louis Suburban Newspapers, Inc.

    598 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1980

    Missouri Church of Scientology v. Adams, 543 S.W.2d at 777 . Plaintiff contends that the language of the article is directed toward him in his professional capacity. In Brown v. … Hudson v. Garner, 22 Mo. 423 (1856); Rail v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Deatherage v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.

    469 S.W.2d 660 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1971

    Williams v. S. N. Long, supra. … Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co., Mo.App., 250 S.W.2d 803, 809 . We find that the award of the commission is supported by competent and *662 substantial evidence upon the whole record. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • School District of Oakland v. School District of Joplin

    340 Mo. 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937

    [See Harrison v. Bridgeton (1819), 16 Mass. 15 , 17; Richardson v. Brown, (1830), 6 Greenl. (Me.) 355, 359.] The later case of Lynn v. … Board of Health of Buena Vista Township v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Snelling v. City of St. Louis

    897 S.W.2d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995

    Louis, Department of Public Utilities — Water Division (Water Division) and the Board of Police Commissioners (Board). … Brown v. City of St. Louis, 842 S.W.2d 163 [3] (Mo.App.E.D.1992).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Waller v. Oliver

    296 S.W.2d 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1956

    As stated in Hertz v. … Combs v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. McCleary v. Adcock

    206 Mo. 550 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1907

    [State ex rel. v. Goodier, 195 Mo. l. c. 560.] … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 .] If, perchance, through a misunderstanding of the law, the board should refuse to perform a given duty, the writ of mandamus will right the wrong. [State ex rel. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Fox & Co. v. Schoemehl

    519 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981

    In Elrod v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 736 [ 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 ] (1974)." Branti, 445 U.S. at 527 , 100 S.Ct. at 1299 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jeans v. Morrison

    99 Mo. App. 208 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903

    S. 1899, sec. 5959; Sherrell v. Murray, 49 Mo. App. (St. L.) 233; McVey v. Barker, 92 Mo. App. (St. L.) 498. The ordinances enacted to carry out this charter power were valid and must be upheld and enforced.. … Spitler v. Young, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Phoenix Loan Ass'n

    85 Mo. App. 477 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1900

    Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo. App. 277 ; Moore v. Association, 74 Mo. App. 468 ; Price v. Association, 75 Mo. App. 551 ; Barnes v. Association, 83 Mo. App. 466 . … Star Association v. Woods, 100 Tenn. 121 ; B. & L. Ass’n v. Leonard, 74 Miss. 810 ; B. & L. Ass’n v. Shields, 71 Miss. 630 ; Patterson v. Association, 63 Ga. 373 ; Haight v. Association, 19 West Va. 792 ; Cox v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Culp v. Rolf

    568 S.W.3d 443 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2018

    Evans v. Brown Builders Elec. … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Church v. Hadley

    240 Mo. 680 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1912

    Mayor, etc. v. Sands, 105 N. … In Mayor, etc. v. Sands, 105 N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Sone ex rel. Road District No. 11 v. Wallendorp

    187 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1905

    At his annual settlement, the collector shall cause to be made and delivered to the clerk of the board of each road district a list of the names, properly sworn to, of all persons who have not paid, and are delinquent in, … [Weese v. Brown, 102 Mo. 299 ; Doggett v. Blanke, 70 Mo. App. 499 , and cases cited; Nutter v. Houston, 32 Mo. App. 451 .]

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Calhoun v. Calhoun

    156 S.W.3d 410 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2005

    Brown v. Brown, 14 S.W.3d 704, 707 (Mo. App.2000). The burden of showing adverse tax consequences must be established with particularity at trial. Linton, 117 S.W.3d at 206 [24]. … At the time of trial, the "children” were both in college and Husband paid all expenses related thereto, including tuition and room and board.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Broderick v. Tyer

    239 Mo. App. 118 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1945

    [Brown v. Weare et al., 152 S. W. (2d) 649 ; Boyce v. Mo. Pac. R. R. Co., 168 Mo. 583 ; Kellog v. Malin, 50 Mo. 496 .] … [Brown v. Weare, supra.]

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Davison v. Davison

    100 Mo. App. 263 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1903

    Louis, boarding at different places, sometimes under the name of Lloyd and sometimes under that of Davison. … Rowden v. Brown, 91 Mo. 429 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Kansas City v. Smart

    128 Mo. 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 1895

    Manker v. Faulhaber, 94 Mo. 430 ; State v. Noland, 111 Mo. 484 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 113 Mo. 202 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383 . … Louis v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Lemasters v. Willman

    281 S.W.2d 580 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1955

    The supreme court approved injunction to prevent a board of education and its superintendent of instruction from employing and dismissing teachers without legal authority in State ex rel. Brown v. … Board of Education of City of Duluth, 215 Minn. 590 , 11 N.W.2d 76 (supt. not a teacher); Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Reisner v. Lonsdorf

    306 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 4, 1969

    Following his appearance before the Board, plaintiff was again classified I-A. Upon appeal to the State Appeal Board, that board on April 14, 1969, classified plaintiff I-A. … Plaintiff argues, on the authority of Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 388 F.2d 973 , that the mere “review” of a Selective Service file of itself constitutes a reopening of a registrant’s classification.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pipes v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

    267 Mo. 385 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1916

    BROWN, C. … [Emerson v. Railway Co., 111 Mo. 161, 165 ; Lore v. Manufacturing Co., 160 Mo. 608, 621 ; McKenzie v. United Railways Co., 216 Mo. 1, 17 ; Railway Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 576 ; Railway Co. v. Gray, 237 U.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.