Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.56s
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Henderson
849 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Apr 11, 1994
Henderson falsified board of director minutes, it does not appear that the FDIC is stating a claim for fraud. The Fifth Circuit and three district courts recently rendered six decisions in similar cases. RTC v. … Do you find, from a preponderance of the evidence, that a majority of the board of directors adversely dominated Southland Savings from 1984 to August 18, 1986? V. TEXAS HOUSE BILL 1076 As in FDIC v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of School Commissioners v. Brown
464 U.S. 1005 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 5, 1983
Cited 14 timesPublishedNo opinion textWilliam C. Rickett v. Eric K. Shinseki
23 Vet. App. 366 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 19, 2010
See Rios v. … Torres v.
Reversed on other grounds by Milan v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs, 421 Fed. Appx. 967 (2011)Cited 4 timesPublished293 Wis. 2d 594 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2006
In State v. … Id. at 265 (citing McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 466 (1969); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 (1938)).
Cited 169 timesPublished290 Ga. 321 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 9, 2012
Appellant Wilbert Brown appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for out-of-time appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. … Brown v. State, 280 Ga. 658, 659 ( 631 SE2d 687 ) (2006). The indictment in this case alleges appellant did “with malice aforethought cause the death of Eric Patterson, a human being, by shooting him.”
Cited 23 timesPublished563 S.W.3d 291 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 14, 2018
Evelyn V. … P. 76a(2) ; see BMC Software Belg., N.V. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished2019 Ohio 1666 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 3, 2019
[Cite as State v. Brown, 2019-Ohio-1666.] … The trial court sustained Brown’s motion to dismiss, based upon State v. Pittman, 150 Ohio St.3d 113, 2016-Ohio-8314, 79 N.E.3d 531. After the trial court’s dismissal, this court decided State v.
Cited 5 timesPublished524 S.W.3d 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 2017
V, sec. 10. … Brown of the charged offense of first degree assault because the jury is free to disbelieve the evidence. See Jackson, 433 S.W.3d at 399 ; State v. Randle, 465 S.W.3d 477, 479 (Mo. banc 2015); State v.
Cited 10 timesPublished488 Mich. 872 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 27, 2010
, Alton Thomas Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices v … SC: 141338 COA: 288552 Genesee CC: 07-021158-FC ROSALIND LAURICE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
Cited 1 timesPublished365 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2011
706 S.E.2d 780 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Glorbman Lamont BROWN. No. 97P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 2011. Angenette R. Stephenson, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. … Glorbman Lamont Brown, for Brown, Glorbman Lamont. William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMedical Arts Hospital v. Robison
216 S.W.3d 38 · Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · Dec 14, 2006
Brown, 960 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no pet.); and Beiser v. Tomball Hosp. Auth., 902 S.W.2d 721 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, writ denied). … Dep’t of Mental Health v.
Cited 19 timesPublished738 Utah Adv. Rep. 10 · Utah Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2013
Brown's cross-appeal. . Lael Brown and Debra Brown are not related. . State v. Brown (Brown I), 948 P.2d 337, 340 (Utah 1997). . Id. at 344 . . … See State v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMurphy v. Zoning Commission of Town of New Milford
223 F. Supp. 2d 377 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Aug 30, 2002
Holding Corp. v. Planning & Zoning Board, 167 Conn. 182, 184-85 , 355 A.2d 91 (1974); Farina v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 157 Conn. 420, 422 , 254 A.2d 492 (1969). … Connecticut Sand & Stone Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 150 Conn. 439, 442 , 190 A.2d 594 (1963). See also generally Courtney v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n, No.
Cited 4 timesPublished14 Va. Cir. 281 · Arlington County Circuit Court · Jan 19, 1989
Cohan v. Thurston, 233 Va. 523 (1982). The plain meaning rule in Virginia requires that "the language used is to be taken in its ordinary signification .... … Virginia Railway Co. v. Avis, 124 Va. 711, 716 (1919). In support of her position, respondent cites Smith v. Smith, 3 Va. App. 510 (1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 2, 2024
Brown v. Texas Bd. of Nursing, 554 F. … App’x 268, 269 (5th Cir. 2014) (“to the extent that the Browns assert that they have raised new claims, such claims clearly stem from the same decision of the Texas Board of Nurse Examiners that the Browns have already challenged
Cited 0 timesUnpublished143 N.Y.S.3d 457 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 11, 2021
People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 01442 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 01442 Decided on March 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Decided and Entered: March 11, 2021 104444B 109502 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick Brown, Also Known as Derek Brown, Appellant.
Cited 5 timesPublished322 P.3d 214 · Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 7, 2014
In People v. Brown, — P.3d — , No. 06CA1751, 2011 WL 1195778, *3-5 (Colo.App. … United States v.
Cited 39 timesPublished313 Or. App. 283 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 2021
Reversed and remanded. 284 State v. Brown LAGESEN, P. J. … See State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished2017 IL App (1st) 150146 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 22, 2017
Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 150146 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption DEWAYNE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. … R. 615(b)(1); see also People v. Brown, 2017 IL App (1st) 142877, ¶ 70; People v. Camacho, 2016 IL App (1st) 140604, ¶ 45. The propriety of a fines and fees order is subject to de novo review. People v.
Cited 25 timesPublished349 Mont. 408 · Montana Supreme Court · Mar 4, 2009
Petitioner and Appellant, v. … In making this argument, Brown contends that based upon the “plain, unmistakable language” in this Court’s decision in State v.
Cited 49 timesPublished
Ask Donna