Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

8.63s

  • Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc.

    967 S.W.2d 157 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1998

    Brown v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Com., 805 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Mo.App.1991). … Co. v. Sam Brown Co., 792 F.Supp. 1520, 1528 (W.D.Mo.1992) (citing Rest. (Second) of Torts section 530, cmt. b (1977)).

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Kaysing v. Ryan

    334 Mo. 743 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 3, 1934

    [Hale v. Stimson, 198 Mo. 134, 145 , 95 S. W. 885 ; Green v. Owen, 38 S. W. (2d) 496 .] … Leake et al. v. Honorable Brown Harris et al., 334 Mo. 713 , 67 S.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lile v. Hancock Place School District

    701 S.W.2d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1985

    Rafael v. Meramec Valley R-III Board of Education, supra at 314-15. … Brown v. Bathke, 566 F.2d 588, 592 (8th Cir.1977).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • American Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. Louis

    238 Mo. 267 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1911

    BROWN, J. … The effect of the case of Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Jenkins

    330 S.W.2d 802 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1959

    Jacobs v. Stone, Mo., 299 S.W.2d 438, 440 [1] ; Ambrose v. M.F.A. Co-op. Ass’n, Mo., 266 S.W.2d 647, 648 [ 1 ], 650, 651; Sullivan v. Holbrook, 211 Mo. 99 , 109 S.W. 668, 670 ; Brown v. … Brown, Mo., 320 S.W.2d 493, 497 [7]; Padgett v. Missouri Motor Distributing Corp., Mo., 177 S.W.2d 490 , 492[5]; Timper v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., Mo., 98 S.W.2d 548 [2]).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Eyermann v. Provenchere

    15 Mo. App. 256 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1884

    Ex parte Randolph, 2 Brock. 447 ; Re Brown, 4 Colo. 438 ; Mills v. Collett, 6 Bing. 85 ; Crepp v. Durden, Cowp. 640. … Spellinger v. Gaff, 112 Ill. 29 , and cases cited; Muldrow v. Bates, 5 Mo. 214 ; Miles v. Davis, 19 Mo. 408 ; Blaisdell v. Steamboat, 19 Mo. 157 ; Scruggs v. Scruggs, 46 Mo. 271 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Reisner v. Lonsdorf

    306 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 4, 1969

    Following his appearance before the Board, plaintiff was again classified I-A. Upon appeal to the State Appeal Board, that board on April 14, 1969, classified plaintiff I-A. … Plaintiff argues, on the authority of Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 388 F.2d 973 , that the mere “review” of a Selective Service file of itself constitutes a reopening of a registrant’s classification.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fox & Co. v. Schoemehl

    519 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981

    In Elrod v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 736 [ 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 ] (1974)." Branti, 445 U.S. at 527 , 100 S.Ct. at 1299 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • School District of Oakland v. School District of Joplin

    340 Mo. 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937

    [See Harrison v. Bridgeton (1819), 16 Mass. 15 , 17; Richardson v. Brown, (1830), 6 Greenl. (Me.) 355, 359.] The later case of Lynn v. … Board of Health of Buena Vista Township v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Boeke v. Williams

    721 S.W.2d 794 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1986

    In the five count petition Plaintiff Boeke sought relief against Williams and Overland; Brown sought relief against all three defendants. … Mason v. Williams Discount Center, Inc., 639 S.W.2d 836 (Mo.App.1982) [6]; Corcoran v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 572 S.W.2d 212 (Mo.App.1978) [3].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deatherage v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.

    469 S.W.2d 660 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1971

    Williams v. S. N. Long, supra. … Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co., Mo.App., 250 S.W.2d 803, 809 . We find that the award of the commission is supported by competent and *662 substantial evidence upon the whole record. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Anton v. St. Louis Suburban Newspapers, Inc.

    598 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1980

    Missouri Church of Scientology v. Adams, 543 S.W.2d at 777 . Plaintiff contends that the language of the article is directed toward him in his professional capacity. In Brown v. … Hudson v. Garner, 22 Mo. 423 (1856); Rail v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Snelling v. City of St. Louis

    897 S.W.2d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995

    Louis, Department of Public Utilities — Water Division (Water Division) and the Board of Police Commissioners (Board). … Brown v. City of St. Louis, 842 S.W.2d 163 [3] (Mo.App.E.D.1992).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • R. L. McDonald & Co. v. Hoover

    142 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 1, 1898

    Reed v. Pelletier, 28 Mo. 173 ; Burgert v. Borchert, 59 Mo. 80 . … Seger’s Sons v. Thomas Bros., 107 Mo. 635 .

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Reid v. Walbridge

    119 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1894

    Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 . And what the law will imply, is as much part and parcel of a legislative enactment, as though set forth in terms. … State ex rel. v. Board, 108 Mo. 235 ; Sutherland on Stat. Construc., sec. 334, and cases cited.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Jeans v. Morrison

    99 Mo. App. 208 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903

    S. 1899, sec. 5959; Sherrell v. Murray, 49 Mo. App. (St. L.) 233; McVey v. Barker, 92 Mo. App. (St. L.) 498. The ordinances enacted to carry out this charter power were valid and must be upheld and enforced.. … Spitler v. Young, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Mutual Life Insurance v. Shain

    344 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1939

    Respondents' brief cites Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co. (Banc), 45 Mo. 221 . … Clark v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. McCleary v. Adcock

    206 Mo. 550 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1907

    [State ex rel. v. Goodier, 195 Mo. l. c. 560.] … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 .] If, perchance, through a misunderstanding of the law, the board should refuse to perform a given duty, the writ of mandamus will right the wrong. [State ex rel. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • State v. Riddle

    843 S.W.2d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1992

    Relying on United States v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 603—04[7], 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Walker, 933 F.2d at 818 [10]. The record gives little indication *388 of the voluntariness of Defendant’s consent.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Bowman v. Greene County Commission

    732 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1987

    The board of zoning adjustment has no legislative power. Rosedale-Skinker Imp. Ass’n v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, 425 S.W.2d 929 (Mo.1968). It functions as an administrative body. Id. … Crouse v. City of Savannah, 696 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.App.1985); Miller v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 674 S.W.2d 150 (Mo.App.1984).

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.