Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
8.63s
Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc.
967 S.W.2d 157 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1998
Brown v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Com., 805 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Mo.App.1991). … Co. v. Sam Brown Co., 792 F.Supp. 1520, 1528 (W.D.Mo.1992) (citing Rest. (Second) of Torts section 530, cmt. b (1977)).
Cited 43 timesPublished334 Mo. 743 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 3, 1934
[Hale v. Stimson, 198 Mo. 134, 145 , 95 S. W. 885 ; Green v. Owen, 38 S. W. (2d) 496 .] … Leake et al. v. Honorable Brown Harris et al., 334 Mo. 713 , 67 S.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLile v. Hancock Place School District
701 S.W.2d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1985
Rafael v. Meramec Valley R-III Board of Education, supra at 314-15. … Brown v. Bathke, 566 F.2d 588, 592 (8th Cir.1977).
Cited 11 timesPublishedAmerican Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. Louis
238 Mo. 267 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1911
BROWN, J. … The effect of the case of Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublished330 S.W.2d 802 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1959
Jacobs v. Stone, Mo., 299 S.W.2d 438, 440 [1] ; Ambrose v. M.F.A. Co-op. Ass’n, Mo., 266 S.W.2d 647, 648 [ 1 ], 650, 651; Sullivan v. Holbrook, 211 Mo. 99 , 109 S.W. 668, 670 ; Brown v. … Brown, Mo., 320 S.W.2d 493, 497 [7]; Padgett v. Missouri Motor Distributing Corp., Mo., 177 S.W.2d 490 , 492[5]; Timper v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., Mo., 98 S.W.2d 548 [2]).
Cited 18 timesPublished15 Mo. App. 256 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1884
Ex parte Randolph, 2 Brock. 447 ; Re Brown, 4 Colo. 438 ; Mills v. Collett, 6 Bing. 85 ; Crepp v. Durden, Cowp. 640. … Spellinger v. Gaff, 112 Ill. 29 , and cases cited; Muldrow v. Bates, 5 Mo. 214 ; Miles v. Davis, 19 Mo. 408 ; Blaisdell v. Steamboat, 19 Mo. 157 ; Scruggs v. Scruggs, 46 Mo. 271 .
Cited 12 timesPublished306 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 4, 1969
Following his appearance before the Board, plaintiff was again classified I-A. Upon appeal to the State Appeal Board, that board on April 14, 1969, classified plaintiff I-A. … Plaintiff argues, on the authority of Miller v. United States, 9 Cir., 388 F.2d 973 , that the mere “review” of a Selective Service file of itself constitutes a reopening of a registrant’s classification.
Cited 1 timesPublished519 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 7, 1981
In Elrod v. … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 736 [ 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 ] (1974)." Branti, 445 U.S. at 527 , 100 S.Ct. at 1299 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedSchool District of Oakland v. School District of Joplin
340 Mo. 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937
[See Harrison v. Bridgeton (1819), 16 Mass. 15 , 17; Richardson v. Brown, (1830), 6 Greenl. (Me.) 355, 359.] The later case of Lynn v. … Board of Health of Buena Vista Township v.
Cited 26 timesPublished721 S.W.2d 794 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1986
In the five count petition Plaintiff Boeke sought relief against Williams and Overland; Brown sought relief against all three defendants. … Mason v. Williams Discount Center, Inc., 639 S.W.2d 836 (Mo.App.1982) [6]; Corcoran v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 572 S.W.2d 212 (Mo.App.1978) [3].
Cited 0 timesPublishedDeatherage v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc.
469 S.W.2d 660 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1971
Williams v. S. N. Long, supra. … Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co., Mo.App., 250 S.W.2d 803, 809 . We find that the award of the commission is supported by competent and *662 substantial evidence upon the whole record. The judgment is affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAnton v. St. Louis Suburban Newspapers, Inc.
598 S.W.2d 493 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1980
Missouri Church of Scientology v. Adams, 543 S.W.2d at 777 . Plaintiff contends that the language of the article is directed toward him in his professional capacity. In Brown v. … Hudson v. Garner, 22 Mo. 423 (1856); Rail v.
Cited 25 timesPublished897 S.W.2d 642 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 1995
Louis, Department of Public Utilities — Water Division (Water Division) and the Board of Police Commissioners (Board). … Brown v. City of St. Louis, 842 S.W.2d 163 [3] (Mo.App.E.D.1992).
Cited 3 timesPublishedR. L. McDonald & Co. v. Hoover
142 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 1, 1898
Reed v. Pelletier, 28 Mo. 173 ; Burgert v. Borchert, 59 Mo. 80 . … Seger’s Sons v. Thomas Bros., 107 Mo. 635 .
Cited 19 timesPublishedState ex rel. Reid v. Walbridge
119 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1894
Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 . And what the law will imply, is as much part and parcel of a legislative enactment, as though set forth in terms. … State ex rel. v. Board, 108 Mo. 235 ; Sutherland on Stat. Construc., sec. 334, and cases cited.
Cited 66 timesPublished99 Mo. App. 208 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903
S. 1899, sec. 5959; Sherrell v. Murray, 49 Mo. App. (St. L.) 233; McVey v. Barker, 92 Mo. App. (St. L.) 498. The ordinances enacted to carry out this charter power were valid and must be upheld and enforced.. … Spitler v. Young, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Mutual Life Insurance v. Shain
344 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1939
Respondents' brief cites Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co. (Banc), 45 Mo. 221 . … Clark v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. McCleary v. Adcock
206 Mo. 550 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1907
[State ex rel. v. Goodier, 195 Mo. l. c. 560.] … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 .] If, perchance, through a misunderstanding of the law, the board should refuse to perform a given duty, the writ of mandamus will right the wrong. [State ex rel. v.
Cited 20 timesPublished843 S.W.2d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1992
Relying on United States v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 603—04[7], 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Walker, 933 F.2d at 818 [10]. The record gives little indication *388 of the voluntariness of Defendant’s consent.
Cited 23 timesPublishedBowman v. Greene County Commission
732 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1987
The board of zoning adjustment has no legislative power. Rosedale-Skinker Imp. Ass’n v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, 425 S.W.2d 929 (Mo.1968). It functions as an administrative body. Id. … Crouse v. City of Savannah, 696 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.App.1985); Miller v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 674 S.W.2d 150 (Mo.App.1984).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna