Case law

McGowan v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 2019

) ORDER ) MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, d/b/a ) SMITHFIELD … The First Amendment and common law “right to inspect and copy public records and documents,” Nixon v.

Revco Southeast Drug Centers, Inc. v. North Carolina Board of Pharmacy

21 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1974

Similar results were reached in the Board of Trade v. … A similar result was reached in the case of Harvell v.

United States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District

976 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 1, 2013

Minutes of Graham County District Board meetings show that Greene (also an NRCS employee) reported to the Board (1) in July 1995 that Orr was interested in doing the 650 Project work, (2) in September 1995 that Orr and Brown … Public records, such as minutes of Graham County District Board meetings, show that Greene reported to the Board in July 1995 that Orr was interested in doing the 650 Project work, in September 1995 that Orr and Brown would

Democratic Party of Guilford County v. Guilford County Board of Elections

342 N.C. 856 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

Blatt Co. v. Southwell, 259 N.C. 468 , 130 S.E.2d 859 (1963). … In Pinehurst, Inc. v. O’Leary Bros. Realty, 79 N.C. App. 51 , 338 S.E.2d 918 , disc. rev. denied, 316 N.C. 378 , 342 S.E.2d 896 (1986), and Leonard E. Warner, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 66 N.C.

Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Brittain

343 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996

Board of School Trustees of Washington City Administrative Unit v. Benner

222 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1943

“Said Board shall allow for the debt service fund the same per capita amount per pupil enrolled for the previous school year to the special charter district and districts voting bonds or borrowing from the County Board of … Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 ; Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 , 167 S. E., 454 , where pertinent statutes are discussed.

Howell v. Tunstall

64 N.C. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1983

Lumber Co. v. West, 247 N.C. 699 , 102 S.E. 2d 248 (1958); In re Brown, 23 N.C. App. 109 , 208 S.E. 2d 282 (1974). … A divorce from bed and board is a judicial separation. Schlagel v. Schlagel, 253 N.C. 787 , 117 S.E. 2d 790 (1961).

Wallace v. Town of North Wilkesboro

151 N.C. 614 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1910

BROWN, J. .This is a civil cause, duly instituted by the plaintiff against tbe defendant, town of North Wilkesboro. A temporary restraining order was issued in said cause by W. R. … Pickler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., p. 223. In this case, Clark, G. J., says: “Pending this appeal, the new schoolhouse bas doubtless been built. If that appeared, we would not decide.an abstract question.”

State v. Avent

253 N.C. 580 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1961

.); Goff v. Savage, 210 P. 374 (Wash.); De La Ysla v. Publix Theatres Corporation, 26 P. 2d 818 (Utah); Brown v. Meyer Sanitary Milk Co., 96 P. 2d 651 (Kan.); Horn v. Illinois Cent. R. … In S. v.

Coble v. Commissioners of Guilford County

184 N.C. 342 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922

The act construed in Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 600, was obviously intended to create a taxing district for road purposes, and the power of the Legislature to enact it was upheld. This case was affirmed in Mills v. … C., 215 ; Parvin v. Comrs., 177 N. C., 508 ; Comrs. v. Pruden, 178 N. C., 394 ; Martin County v. Bank, 178 N. C., 26 ; Comrs. v. Bank, 178 N. C., 170 . See, also, Board of Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. C., 379 .

Waldroup v. . Ferguson

213 N.C. 198 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1938

S. v. Purify, 86 N. C., 681 ; Warlick v. Lowman, 103 N. C., 122 , 9 S. E., 458 ; Barber v. Griffin, 158 N. C., 348 , 74 S. E., 110 ; S. v. Haynie, 169 N. C., 277 , 84 S. E., 385 . … E., 753 ; Lexington v. Lopp, 210 N. C., 196 , 185 S. E., 766 ; Simon v. Craft, 182 U. S., 427 ; Truax v. Corrigan, 257 U. S., 312 . *202 In Cook v. Vickers, 144 N. C., 312 , 57 S. E., 1 , cited with approval in Brown v.

Obie v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

762 F. Supp. 119 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 1991

Named as defendants in the Complaint are the North Carolina State Board of Elections, Alex Brock in this official capacity as the Director of the State Board of Elections, the Durham County Board of Elections, and Jo Over-man … Greaves v. State Board of Elections, 508 F.Supp. 78 (E.D.N. C.1980).

State to the Use of the Board of Education v. . Moody

74 N.C. 77 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Moore v. Idealease of Wilmington

358 B.R. 248 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 8, 2006

“The Rooker-Feldman doctrine provides that ‘a United States District Court has no authority to review final judgments of a state court in judicial proceedings.’ ” Brown & Root, Inc. v. … Brown & Root, 211 F.3d at 198 .

Duggins v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT EXAMINERS

287 N.C. 258 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975

DUGGINS, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT EXAMINERS. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 6, 1975. Henson, Donahue & Elrod, for plaintiff. Allen, Steed & Pullen, for defendant.

Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of Wilmington

237 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1953

In Board of Health v. … See also Burleson v. Board of Aldermen, 200 N.C. 30 , 156 S.E. 241 . In Palmer v.

City of Raleigh v. North Carolina Railroad

129 N.C. 265 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1901

Tbe point now raised has been recently and fully discussed and determined in Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N.C., 701 , 18 Am., St. Rep., 611. … Tbe point that tbe defendant is liable for tbe acts of its. lessee is settled by Aycock v. Railroad, 89 N. C., 330 ; Logan v. Railroad, 116 N. C., 940 , and a dozen or more cases affirming tbe same.

Furr v. . Trull

205 N.C. 417 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1933

Bank v. Bank, 197 N. C., 526 , 150 S. E., 34 , Bailey v. Hassell, 184 N. C., 450 , 115 S. E., 166 , Potato Co. v. Jeanette, 174 N. C., 236 , 93 S. E., 795 , Power Co. v. Power Co., 171 N. C., 248 , 88 S. … In Welfare v. Thompson, 83 N.

Myrover v. . French .

73 N.C. 609 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875

Snider v. Sackenhour, 2 Ired Fq., 360. Ellington v. Currie, 5 Ired. Eq., 21 . … Thompson v. Marker, 2 Jones, Eq. 475, and Shoffner v. Fogleman, 1 Winst. Eq. 12.

Caudill v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF GREENSBORO

166 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

. § 160A-388(e) (2003), an "aggrieved party" may appeal decisions of the Board of Adjustment to superior court by filing a petition for writ of certiorari. See Heery v. Town of Highlands Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. … Green, Jr., The Zoning Board of Adjustment in North Carolina 78 (2d ed. 1984) (citing Pigford v. Bd. of Adjustment, 49 N.C.