Case law

Bowman v. Greene County Commission

732 S.W.2d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1987

The board of zoning adjustment has no legislative power. Rosedale-Skinker Imp. Ass’n v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, 425 S.W.2d 929 (Mo.1968). It functions as an administrative body. Id. … Crouse v. City of Savannah, 696 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.App.1985); Miller v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 674 S.W.2d 150 (Mo.App.1984).

Whalen v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

351 S.W.2d 788 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1961

Charles v. … Charles v. De Sherlia, supra; Burnett v. St.

State ex rel. Granville v. Gregory

83 Mo. 123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

White Water Valley Canal Co. v. Vallette, 21 How. 424 ; Bostock v. Railway Co., 4 El. and Bl. 819 ; Ex parte Birmingham Bankinq Co., L. R., 6 Ch. 83; Ketchum v. Buffalo, 14 New York, 356. … Supervisors, 12 John. 414 ; Chase v. Canal Co., 10 Pick. 244 ; Hargreaves v. Taylor, 3 B. and S. 611. In a recent case in Minnesota, State v.

City of Jackson Ex Rel. Cape County Savings Bank v. Houck

226 Mo. App. 835 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1931

Charles v. Stookey, 154 Fed. 772 ; Haskins v. City of DeSoto (Mo. App.), 35 S. … While it is true, as said by the court in the case of Brown v. Walker, 11 Mo.

State v. Johnson

529 S.W.2d 658 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 12, 1975

Miss Reed followed Johnson down to the center concourse, lost him for a while and then saw him again at the gate, in the boarding area. … United States v.

State v. Riddle

843 S.W.2d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1992

Relying on United States v. … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 603—04[7], 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Walker, 933 F.2d at 818 [10]. The record gives little indication *388 of the voluntariness of Defendant’s consent.

Lackland v. Walker

151 Mo. 210 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1899

L. 1, 19, per Lord Cairns; Wright v. Wilkin (1860) 2 B. & S. 232 ; Brown v. Baptist Society (1869) 9 R. I. 177, 186, 188 ; Russell v. Allen (1882) 107 U. S. 163, 166 , 167 ; Mills v. Davison (1896), 54 N. J. … T. 171 ; Stanley v. Colt (1866) 5 Wall. 119 ; Brown v. Baptist Society (1869) 9 R. I. 177 ; Women’s Christian Assn, v.

Schufeldt v. Smith

131 Mo. 280 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1895

Alberger v. Bank, 123 Mo. 313 ; Slavens v. Cook Drug Company, 128 Mo. 341 ; *287 Waggoner-Gates Milling Co. v. Commission Company, 128 Mo. 473 . … Brown v. Furniture Co., 58 Fed. Rep. loc. cit. 292. See, also, Worthen v. Griffith, 28 S. W. Rep. (Ark.) 286, and cases cited.

Davis v. Research Medical Center

903 S.W.2d 557 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 1995

Lawson v. Lawson, 415 S.W.2d 313, 316 (Mo.App.1967) (citing Shrock v. Wolfe Auto Sales, Inc., 358 S.W.2d 812, 814 (Mo.1962)); see also Brown v. … See Thacker v. Massman Constr. Co., 247 S.W.2d 623, 627 (Mo.1952); Hall v. Spot Martin, Inc., 304 S.W.2d 844, 847-48 (Mo.1957); Brown v. Anthony Mfg. Co., 311 S.W.2d 23, 27 (Mo. banc 1958); Miller v.

Hampton v. Thurmand

619 S.W.2d 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1981

Louis, and the Board of Police Commissioners for the City of St. Louis, individually, were added as third party defendants. … In Calero-Toledo v.

Townes v. City of St. Louis

949 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 6, 1996

See Andre v. Board of Trustees, 561 F.2d 48, 53 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1013 , 98 S.Ct. 727 , 54 L.Ed.2d 756 (1978); Wardwell v. Board of Education, 529 F.2d 625, 627 (6th Cir.1976); Wright v. … Brown v. Nix, 33 F.3d 951, 954 (8th Cir.1994).

Thompson v. Abbott

61 Mo. 176 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1875

In substance, it is averred that plaintiff was employed by the board of education of sub-district No. 3, of school township No. 13, of range 22, to teach a school in said district at a stipulated price, which the board agreed … It was merged in the city corporation under the direction and control of its board of education.

Thogmartin v. Nevada School District

189 Mo. App. 10 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1915

Louis v. Henry County, 115 Mo. 557 ; City of St. Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 ; Mullins v. Mount St. … The school board can enforce rules against the intrusion thereon of the public the same as a private owner.

State v. Summers

320 Mo. 189 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1928

[State v. Flynn, 258 Mo. 211 , 219, 167 S.W. 516 .] In State v. Brown (Mo.), 296 S.W. 125 , the defendant was charged in separate counts with five distinct felonies. … V.

State Ex Rel. Mutual Life Insurance v. Shain

344 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1939

Respondents' brief cites Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co. (Banc), 45 Mo. 221 . … Clark v.

Hatfield v. Meers

402 S.W.2d 35 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1966

In Brown v. Boyd, 33 Cal.App.2d 416 , 91 P.2d 926 , an ordinance was adopted as an emergency measure authorizing three additional police captains. … The court said: “These cases are all distinguishable from Brown v.

Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc.

967 S.W.2d 157 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1998

Brown v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Com., 805 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Mo.App.1991). … Co. v. Sam Brown Co., 792 F.Supp. 1520, 1528 (W.D.Mo.1992) (citing Rest. (Second) of Torts section 530, cmt. b (1977)).

Creighton v. Conway

937 S.W.2d 247 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1996

Plaintiff, Jacquelyn Creighton, appeals after summary judgment in favor of defendants,, members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. … Brown v. Tate, 888 S.W.2d 413, 415 (Mo.App. W.D.1994). Creighton’s first point on appeal confuses the concepts of “emergency vehicle” and “emergency call.”

Haire v. Stagner

356 S.W.2d 305 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1962

Gruetzemacher v. Billings, supra, 348 S.W.2d loc. cit. 957; Brown v. Kroger Co., Mo., 344 S.W.2d 80, 83 (4); Harbourn v. Katz Drug Co., supra, 318 S.W. 2d loc. cit. 229 (2); Ostresh v. Illinois Terminal R. … In addition to the Brown, Harbourn, Howard, Stafford and Heidt cases, supra, see Harper v. First Nat. Bank of Kansas City, Mo., 196 S.W.2d 265 , 268(3); Hudson v.

Frame v. Boatmen's Bank of Concord Village

824 S.W.2d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1992

Its always been my experience the people that I deal with, when they give you their committment they get it by the board and that’s why I use the term ‘run it by the board’, not approved by the board.” … AT & T Information Systems, Inc., 702 F.Supp. 1489, 1501 (D.Colo.1988); Browne v. Maxfield, 663 F.Supp. *497 1193, 1207 (E.D.Pa.1987); Torres v. Borzelleca, 641 F.Supp. 542, 545-47 (E.D.Pa.1986); Gale v.