Case law

Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners

41 N.C. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1979

In Refining Co. v. … See Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 (1969); Utilities Commission v. Tank Line, 259 N.C. 363 , 130 S.E. 2d 663 (1963).”

Riddick v. Richmond Cedar Works

227 N.C. 647 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1947

In compliance, the claimant, in the absence of the regular sawyer, undertook to assist another employee in cutting off a board. … Brown v. Aluminum Co., 224 N. C., 766 , 32 S. E. (2d), 320 . He was doing “some work” in the vicinity of one of the saws, pursuant to instructions from his superior. This suffices to repel the motion to dismiss.

Howell v. Tunstall

64 N.C. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1983

Lumber Co. v. West, 247 N.C. 699 , 102 S.E. 2d 248 (1958); In re Brown, 23 N.C. App. 109 , 208 S.E. 2d 282 (1974). … A divorce from bed and board is a judicial separation. Schlagel v. Schlagel, 253 N.C. 787 , 117 S.E. 2d 790 (1961).

Revco Southeast Drug Centers, Inc. v. North Carolina Board of Pharmacy

21 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1974

Similar results were reached in the Board of Trade v. … A similar result was reached in the case of Harvell v.

Democratic Party of Guilford County v. Guilford County Board of Elections

342 N.C. 856 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

Blatt Co. v. Southwell, 259 N.C. 468 , 130 S.E.2d 859 (1963). … In Pinehurst, Inc. v. O’Leary Bros. Realty, 79 N.C. App. 51 , 338 S.E.2d 918 , disc. rev. denied, 316 N.C. 378 , 342 S.E.2d 896 (1986), and Leonard E. Warner, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 66 N.C.

Moffitt v. . Davis

205 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 10, 1934

See Hudson v. McArthur , 152 N.C. 445 , and dissenting opinion by Brown, J. , concurred in by Walker, J . In Fore v. … Hipp v. Farrell , 173 N.C. 167 ; Brown v. R. R. , 188 N.C. 52 ; Noland v. Trustees , 190 N.C. 250 . In the Fore case, supra , the violation of the particular act is made a misdemeanor.

Board of School Trustees of Washington City Administrative Unit v. Benner

222 N.C. 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1943

“Said Board shall allow for the debt service fund the same per capita amount per pupil enrolled for the previous school year to the special charter district and districts voting bonds or borrowing from the County Board of … Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 ; Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 , 167 S. E., 454 , where pertinent statutes are discussed.

Rhyne v. Flint Manufacturing Co.

182 N.C. 489 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1921

Besides, the Board of Health had no authority to pass upon this matter as against the plaintiff. … C., 115 ; Hyatt v. Myers, 71 N. C., 271 ; Hickory v. R. R., 143 N.

Barnaby v. Boardman

313 N.C. 565 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1985

The defendant sellers in the present case rely upon this Court’s decision in Brown v. … We conclude that the rationale of Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E. 2d 601 (1940) was severely undercut by Realty Co. v.

Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.

248 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1958

Williams v. Foreman, supra; Chesson v. Jordan, 224 N.C. 289 , 29 S.E. 2d 906 ; Hemphill v. Board of Aldermen, 212 N.C. 185 , 193 S.E. 153 ; Tise v. Whitaker, supra. … Watkins v. Madison County Trust & Deposit Co. supra. The appointment of a receiver did not stop its' running. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Brown, Tex. Civ. App., 202 S.W. 102 , certiorari denied, 250 U.S. 659 , 40 S.

Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Brittain

343 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996

Stevenson Ex Rel. Stevenson v. Martin County Board of Education

93 F. Supp. 2d 644 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 1999

Inc. v. Matkari, 7 F.3d 1130 (4th Cir.1993). II. … The second is an untitled claim under § 1983 against Martin County Board of Education, Peele and Respass.

Vample v. McNeill

241 N.C. 308 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1954

On the authority of Tyer, Administratrix, v. Lumber Co., 188 N.C. 274, 124 S.E. 306 , the judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Anderson v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 14, 2019

SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:14-CV-183-BR EUNICE ANDERSON, et al., ) Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER MURPHY-BROWN … See Stern v. Cinoman, 221 N.C. App. 231, 233 (2012) (holding a guardian of the estate has the power to bring suit on behalf of a ward); Clawser v. Campbell, 184 N.C.

Browning-Ferris Industries of South Atlantic, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment

126 N.C. App. 168 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1997

Browning-Ferris Industries of South Atlantic, Inc. … BFI argues that the Board “misapplied the vested rights standard and erred as a matter of law.” Accordingly, this Court’s review of the Board’s decision is de novo. Ballas v. Town of Weaverville, 121 N.C.

Lewis v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 25, 2019

) ORDER ) MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, ) … Clark v. Harrah’s NC Casino Co., LLC, No. 1:17–CV–00240–MR–DLH, 2018 WL 4664136, at *1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2018) (citing Thomas v.

Myrover v. . French .

73 N.C. 609 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1875

Snider v. Sackenhour, 2 Ired Fq., 360. Ellington v. Currie, 5 Ired. Eq., 21 . … Thompson v. Marker, 2 Jones, Eq. 475, and Shoffner v. Fogleman, 1 Winst. Eq. 12.

Obie v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

762 F. Supp. 119 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 1991

Named as defendants in the Complaint are the North Carolina State Board of Elections, Alex Brock in this official capacity as the Director of the State Board of Elections, the Durham County Board of Elections, and Jo Over-man … Greaves v. State Board of Elections, 508 F.Supp. 78 (E.D.N. C.1980).

Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Latta

343 N.C. 508 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 1996

Rone Ex Rel. Roseboro v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

207 N.C. App. 618 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 2010

re Alexander v. … When the language of a school board policy is clear and without ambiguity, it is the duty of this Court to give effect to the plain meaning of the policy. See North Carolina Dept. of Revenue v.