Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.63s

  • H. F. Mitchell Construction Co. v. Orange County Board of Education

    262 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1964

    Reverie Lingerie, Inc. v. McCain, 258 N.C. 353 , 128 S.E. 2d 835 ; In re Simmons, 256 N.C. 184 , 123 S.E. 2d 614 ; Insurance Company v. Shaffer, 250 N.C. 45 , 108 S.E. 2d 49 ; Bradsher v. … Accepting as correct defendant’s contention that the judgment rendered in Winters’ suit against Construction Company was neither an estoppel, nor evidence against Board of Education that rock had been excavated, it does not

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Claybrook v. . Commissioners

    114 N.C. 454 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

    The exception as to issue or violation of constitutional provisions is expressly stated in Duke v. Brown , 96 N.C. 127 , and in R. R. v. Commissioners , 109 N.C. 159 . … Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 , and Duke v. Brown, supra . It does not appear that the ballots used did not follow the exact requirements of the statute.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Town of Oriental v. Henry

    197 N.C. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2009

    The lease provides: We, the governing board of commissioners of the Town of Oriental, do hereby lease to Mr. L.C. … Lee v. Walker, 234 N.C. 687, 696 , 68 S.E.2d 664, 670 (1952).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davidson v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of Education

    62 N.C. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983

    The Supreme Court in Overton v. … Thompson v. Bd. of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 2021

    ) ) MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, ) … Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597– 98 (1978).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hooper v. Pizzagalli Construction Co.

    112 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1993

    Brown v. Texas Company, 237 N.C. 738 , 76 S.E.2d 45 (1953). … Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc., 86 N.C. App. 157, 158 , 356 S.E.2d 912, 913 , disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 794 , 361 S.E.2d 80 (1987).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Kiger v. Kiger

    258 N.C. 126 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1962

    Archbell v. Archbell, supra; Walton v. Walton, 178 N.C. 73 , 100 S.E. 176 ; Smith v. Smith, 225 N.C. 189 , 34 S.E. 2d 148 , 160 A.L.R. 460 ; Daughtry v Daughtry, 225 N.C. 358 , 34 S.E. 2d 435 ; Bolin v. … Lentz v. Lentz, 193 N.C. 742 , 138 S.E. 12 ; Brown v. Brown, 205 N.C. 64 , 169 S.E. 818 ; Turner v. Turner, 205 N.C. 198 , 170 S.E. 646 ; Davis v, Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 ; Holden v. Holden, supra.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Foy v. Foy

    69 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1984

    Clark v. Clark, 294 N.C. 554 , 243 S.E. 2d 129 (1978). See also Lee v. Lee, 37 N.C. App. 371 , 246 *215 S.E. 2d 49 (1978). … is defined by the State Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Alford v. Shaw

    72 N.C. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1985

    We also must bear in mind that whether corporate boards can dispose of derivative litigation by committees remains essentially a question of state law. Burks v. Lasker, supra. … Brown, Shareholder Derivative Litigation and the Special Litigation Committee, 43 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 601 (1982) (hereinafter Brown).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Webb v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 9, 2021

    Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597– 98 (1978). … Dep’t of State Police v. Wash. Post, 386 F.3d 567, 576 (4th Cir. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Houpe v. City of Statesville

    128 N.C. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1998

    Brown (Brown), Investigations Lieutenant Edward Jarvis (Jarvis), Internal Affairs Investigator Gregory Stone (Stone), and criminal investigator Michael Grant (Grant) appeal an order of the trial court denying their motion … Tatum v. Brown, 29 N.C. App. 504, 505 , 224 S.E.2d 698, 699 (1976).

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Transportation Services of North Carolina, Inc. v. Wake County Board of Education

    198 N.C. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 2009

    See Finger v. Gaston County, 178 N.C. … See also Maready v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Commissioners v. . Commissioners

    70 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

    The question in this case is the same as in Steele v. Commissioners , ante 137, at this term, and the decision is the same, and for the same reason. … The Board of Commissioners of a county must be sued in the county of which they are Commissioners. There is no error. PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jacksonville Daily News Co. v. ONSLOW COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION

    439 S.E.2d 607 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1994

    439 S.E.2d 607 (1993) JACKSONVILLE DAILY NEWS CO., a North Carolina Corporation, v. The ONSLOW COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 904SC1172. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 21, 1993. … See, e.g., News & Observer Publishing Co. v. Board of Educ., 29 N.C.App. 37, 50 , 223 S.E.2d 580, 588 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Osborne v. Town of North Wilkesboro Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners

    280 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1972

    Irwin v. Charlotte, 193 N.C. 109 , 136 *700 S.E. 368; Sugg v. Greenville, 169 N.C. 606 , 86 S.E. 695 ; Salisbury v. Barnhardt, 249 N.C. 549 , 107 S.E. 2d 297 ; Steadman v. Pinetops, 251 N.C. 509 , 112 S.E. 2d 102 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Plott v. . Comrs.

    187 N.C. 125 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 22, 1924

    Jones v. Boyd , 80 N.C. 258 ; Evans v. R. R. , R. R., 96 N.C. 47 ; Burns v. McFarland , 146 N.C. 382 ; Davenport v. Comrs. , 163 N.C. 147 ; Peters v. Highway Com. , 184 N.C. 30 ; School Com. v. … Newsome v. Earnheart, supra; DeBerry v. Nicholson, supra; Roberts v. Calvert , 98 N.C. 581 ; Hampton v. Waldrop , 104 N.C. 453 ; Quinn v. Lattimore , 120 N.C. 426 ; Hendersonville v. Jordan , 150 N.C. 35 ; Gibson v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Grimes v. Gibert

    6 N.C. App. 304 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1969

    Highway #15 in order to illuminate the automobile of defendant Brown; that after Brown’s car was started Moore’s car became stalled; that Moore then directed Brown to turn his (Brown’s) automobile around in the northbound … In Riddle v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Page Trust Co. v. Carolina Construction Co.

    191 N.C. 664 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1926

    Noland Co. v. Trustees, supra; Warner v. Halyburton, supra; Ingold v. Hickory, supra; Scheflow v. Pierce, 176 N. C., 91 ; Hutchinson v. Comrs., 172 N. C., 844 ; Hall v. Jones, 151 N. C., 419 . … Brown v. Dail, 117 N. C., 41 ; Williams v. Chapman, 118 N. C., 943 ; Stott v. Franey, 23 A. S. R., 132, and note; 2 R. C. L., 599.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Tartan Marine Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    446 F. Supp. 1174 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 24, 1978

    In Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Co., 415 U.S. 1 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974), the government contended that § 552(a)(4)(B) provided the sole and exclusive injunctive remedy available in a FOIA case. … See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. NLRB, supra; Committee on Masonic Homes, etc. v. NLRB, 414 F.Supp. 426 (D.C. Pa.1976); Roger J. Au & Son, Inc. v. NLRB, 405 F.Supp. 1200 (W.D.Pa.1976). Contra St. Elizabeth’s Hospital v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dusenberry v. Dusenberry

    73 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1985

    Hinton v. Hinton, 70 N.C. App. 665 , 321 S.E. 2d 161 (1984); see also Wade v. Wade, 72 N.C. App. 372 , 325 S.E. 2d 260 (1985); Smith v. Smith, 71 N.C. App. 242 , 322 S.E. 2d 393 (1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.