Case law

Rice v. Huff

22 S.W.3d 774 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 2000

Mahaffy v. City of Woodson Terrace, 609 S.W.2d 233, 238 (Mo.App.1980). A city street may only be abandoned “by an affirmative act on the part of the board of aldermen.” Brown v. … “It is undoubtedly true that the legislative power vested in a board of aldermen and the mayor can be exercised only by ordinance....” City of Jackson, to Use of Cape County Sav. Bank v.

Opinion No. (1990)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 1990

Brown v. Morris, 290 S.W.2d 160 , 166 (Mo. banc 1956). … Lebeau v. Kelly, 697 S.W.2d 312 , 315 (Mo.App. 1985).

Hayes v. WDL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

343 S.W.3d 719 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2011

See Gamble v. Browning, 277 S.W.3d 723, 729-30 (Mo.App. W.D.2008) (stating a denial of summary judgment is not reviewable even if it is an appeal from a- final judgment except in limited circumstances); Stotts v. … Defendants rely on Rice v.

State v. Hale

238 Mo. 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1911

It appears from the evidence that defendant, beginning in March previous to the homicide, boarded with the deceased, that they quarreled in May, and that defendant then went to board with the Sagers. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

Stevenson v. City of St. Louis School District

820 S.W.2d 609 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1991

The Board of Education, as a subdivision of the State, is a public entity which is protected from an action in negligence by sovereign immunity. Bartley v. Sp. Sch. Dist. of St. … Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). As used in § 537.600.1(2), dangerous condition has a narrow meaning and refers to defects in the physical condition of the public entity’s property.

Shepard Well Drilling Co. v. St. Louis County

912 S.W.2d 606 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1995

Brown v. Melahn, 824 S.W.2d 930, 932 (Mo.App.E.D. en banc 1992). We accord no deference to the trial court on matters of law. Id. … Contra Vest v. Kansas City, 355 Mo. 1 , 194 S.W.2d 38, 39 (1946).

State ex rel. Bristol v. Walbridge

69 Mo. App. 657 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1897

State ex rel. v. Edwards, 104 Mo. 125 ; State v. Buchanan Co. Board of Education, 108 Mo. 235 ; Ward v. Board of Equalization of Gentry Co., 36 S. W. Rep. 648 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 62 Mo. … Cockerill v. Stafford, 102 Mo. 57 ; Smith v. C. & A. R. R., 119 Mo. 246 ; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65 ; Elfrank v. Seiler, 54 Mo. 134 . It comes too late here, and we rule this objection against the relator.

Fix v. Fix Material Co., Inc.

538 S.W.2d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1976

Plaintiff succeeded to her husband’s position on the corporate board in 1966 and the board was increased by one member sometime in 1966 or 1967 to provide an additional director friendly to plaintiff’s interests. … Long-term employment contracts for corporate officers present problems, running afoul the general maxim that management and control of the corporation is vested in the board of directors. See Streett v.

Wages v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad

110 Mo. App. 230 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1905

It is not so decided in the cases of Ferris v. Railroad, 30 Mo. App. 122 , and Board v. Railroad, 36 Mo. App. 151 , or the other cases cited by defendant. The syllabus in the Board case is somewhat misleading. … The judgment was manifestly for the right party (Brown v. Railroad, 78 S. W. Rep. 273 ) and is affirmed. All concur.

Cain v. Webster

770 S.W.2d 327 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1989

Mullen v. Renner, supra. See Cain v. Scott, 782 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir.1985); Cain v. State of Arkansas and Arkansas State Podiatry Board, 734 F.2d 377 (8th Cir.1984); Cain v. … See Whit *330 aker v. Coleman, 115 F.2d 305 (5th Cir.1940); Barrett v. Craven County Board of Education, 70 F.R.D. 466 (E.D.N.C.1976); Waltz v.

State ex rel. Barker v. Wurdeman

254 Mo. 561 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1914

[State ex rel. v. Broaddus, 245 Mo. 123, 135 ; State ex rel. v. Dobson, 135 Mo. 1, 19 .] A like rule prevails elsewhere. [Ex parte Montgomery, In re Knox, 64 Ala. 463 ; McLaren v. Brown, 34 Ga. 583 .] … J., and Brown and Bond, JJ., dissent.

Diariotti v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

262 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 17, 1914

[Perry v. Railroad, 29 Kan. 420 ; 423.] … J., Brown, Bond, Walker and Faris, JJ., concur; Woodson, J., dissents in an opinion filed; Graves, J., dubitante.

In Re Sidebottom's Estate

327 S.W.2d 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1959

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 126 N.J.Eq. 406, 9 A.2d 311 , loc. cit. 330. … Fitterling, 342 Mo. 299 , 114 S.W.2d 1004 , Citizens' Bank of Lancaster v. Foglesong, 326 Mo. 581 , 31 S.W.2d 778 , and Cook v.

McLaran v. Crescent Planing Mill Co.

117 Mo. App. 40 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1906

Corp., sec. 2206; Cook on Corp., sec. 539; Wright v. Warren, 4 De Gex Rep. 367; Browne v. Collins, 12 Eq. 586; Ibotson v. Elam, 1 Eq. 186; Jacques v. Chamber, 2 Collyer 435.] … East Hampton Rubber Thread Co., 158 Mass. 84 , is cited and relied upon by appellant as authority for the action of the board of directors in rescinding the dividend, in that case it appears that the *51 board of directors

State v. Jacob

260 S.W.2d 22 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1953

The fundamental error of appellants' contention is demonstrated in the case of Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 , 136 A.L.R. 286 . … Brown v. Weare, 348 Mo. 135 , 152 S.W.2d 649 . Respondent claims no more. The judgment of the trial court should be and is affirmed. All concur.

City of Independence v. Gates

110 Mo. 374 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1892

Levee Co. v. Hardin, 27 Mo. 496 ; Palmyra v. Morton, 25 Mo. 593 ; Sheehan v. Hospital, 50 Mo. 155 ; St. Louis v. Allen, 53 Mo. 44 ; Keith v. Bingham, 100 Mo. 300 . … Diggins v. Brown, 76 Cal. 318 ; Rentz v. Detroit, 48 Mich. 544 ; City of Kansas v. Baird, 98 Mo. 215 ; Desty on Taxation, pp. 29, 30.

Pierce v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

380 S.W.2d 943 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1964

Alvey v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Mo., 360 S.W.2d 231, 1 . c. 236; Tueteberg v. St. Louis Public Service Company, Mo.App., 41 S.W.2d 956 . … Other cases in point are Elgin v. Kroger Grocery and Baking Co., 357 Mo. 19 , 206 S.W.2d 501 ; Moore v. St. Louis Transit Co., 193 Mo. 411 , 91 S.W. 1060 ; Sollars v.

Quinn v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

218 Mo. 545 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 31, 1909

The case of Orcutt v. Century Building Company, 201 Mo. 424 , is cited as authority. … [Zander v. Railroad, 206 Mo. 445 , and cases cited.] Nor will it do to say that the giving of such an instruction does not work prejudice. V.

Bland v. City of Trenton

618 S.W.2d 438 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1981

State v. Smith 431 S.W.2d 74 (Mo.1968); State v. Aubuchon, 381 S.W.2d 807 (Mo.1964); and see Rose v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts 397 S.W.2d 570 (Mo.1966). … Brown v. McNeal, 586 S.W.2d 359 (Mo.App.1979); Cox v. McNeal, 571 S.W.2d 881 (Mo.App.1979); Macchi v. Whaley, supra; Miller v. Whaley, supra.

Baker v. City of Independence

106 Mo. App. 507 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1904

The defect which caused plaintiff to fall was a broken board in the sidewalk. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff from which defendant appealed. … App. 165 , wherein his wife recovered on the same facts in issue herein, which was afterwards affirmed by this court, and cites us to the case of Brown v. Railway, 96 Mo. App. 164 .