Case law

State v. Brown

310 Neb. 318 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2021

On direct appeal, this court affirmed Brown’s convic- tions and sentences. 1 Now Brown appeals the district court’s overruling of his motion for new trial. 1 State v. Brown, 302 Neb. 53, 921 N.W.2d 804 (2019). … Affirmed. 13 See State v. Figures, 308 Neb. 801, 957 N.W.2d 161 (2021). 14 See, State v. Wheeler, 308 Neb. 708, 956 N.W.2d 708 (2021); State v.

The People v. O'Neill

33 Ill. 2d 184 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1965

Engle v. … We think it is clear beyond question that the members of the Peoria County board of supervisors were at least de facto officers within the traditional definition of Lavin v.

Brown v. State

211 So. 3d 1054 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 14, 2015

Brown v. State

273 So. 3d 869 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 9, 2018

Brown v. State

180 A.3d 1055 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Feb 15, 2018

Brown v. State

210 So. 3d 1296 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 2, 2015

People v. Brown

210 Cal. App. 4th 1 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 17, 2012

People v. … People v.

Burtman v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 156 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 2012

(Dallas-Stephenson v Waisman, 39 AD3d 303 [1st Dept 2007].) … (See Maggio v Werner, 213 AD2d 883, 884 [3d Dept 1995], citing Markley v Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp., 163 AD2d 639, 640 [3d Dept 1990]; see also Wasserman v Staten Is.

State v. Brown

2014 NMSC 38 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2014

State v. … II, § 13; see also Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v.

Paturu v. MED. LICENSURE COM'N OF ALABAMA

981 So. 2d 1122 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 29, 2007

She cites East Colbert Store, Inc. v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board , 661 So.2d 757 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994), in support of her argument. … Eitzen v. Medical Licensure Comm'n of Alabama , 709 So.2d 1239 , 1240 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998). Because Dr.

State v. Brown

721 S.E.2d 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2012

721 S.E.2d 227 (2012) STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory Mark BROWN. No. 555P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 26, 2012. Kimberly N. Callahan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. … Blau, for Brown, Gregory Mark. Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.

106 F. Supp. 2d 462 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 2000

See United States v. Bagaric, 706 F.2d 42, 67 (2d Cir.1983); United States v. Holmquist, 36 F.3d 154, 167 (1st Cir.1994); Denison v. … United States v. Brown, 688 F.2d 1112, 1116 (7th Cir.1982). The U.S.

State v. Dalzell

282 Conn. 709 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jun 19, 2007

Sabrowski v. Sabrowski, supra, 560 ; see also Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., supra, 99. … State v.

Brown v. Patterson

108 A.D.3d 1131 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 5, 2013

, 1010-1011 [2006]; Matter of Wilson v Bennett, 282 AD2d 933, 934 [2001]). … ]; see Kuhn v Kuhn, 129 AD2d 967, 967 [1987]; see also CPLR 5512 [a]).

Brown v. State

268 So. 3d 598 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 3, 2017

Brown v. Cox

830 Utah Adv. Rep. 12 · Utah Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2017

(continued . . .) 3  BROWN v. … Brown’s Verified Complaint, as submitted, does not meet all the 11  BROWN v.

Brown v. State

182 A.3d 114 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 13, 2018

Brown v. State

273 So. 3d 875 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 9, 2018

People v. Brown

142 A.D.3d 769 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 1, 2016

The verdict as to Brown and Layne was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). … Defendants Brown’s and Layne’s argu- *771 merits regarding the scope of our review of the court’s ruling are unavailing (see People v Nicholson, 26 NY3d 813 [2016]; People v Garrett, 23 NY3d 878 , 885 n 2 [2014]).

People v. Brown

13 N.Y.3d 332 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2009

Because the report is “nontestimonial,” we hold that its admission did not constitute a Crawford violation (see Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 [2004]; Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts, 557 US —, 129 S Ct 2527 [2009]). … The People cited to People v Cratsley ( 86 NY2d 81 [1995]) and People v Kennedy ( 68 NY2d 569 [1986]), arguing that a business record can be introduced by a person who is not a custodian of records, provided that the other