Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.62s

  • Capricorn Equity Corp. v. Town of Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment

    106 N.C. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 1992

    In reversing the Board the trial court stated: Having reviewed the undisputed facts set forth in the record stipulated by counsel for petitioner and respondent as the official record of the board of adjustment’s decision, … In P.A.W. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Polk v. Jackson

    367 N.C. 325 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abl Plumbing and Heating Corporation v. Bladen County Board of Education

    360 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2006

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Granville County Board of Commissioners v. North Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Commission

    329 N.C. 615 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 14, 1991

    J., in Burton v. Reidsville, 243 N.C. 405, 407 , 90 S.E. 2d 700 [1956]. Id. at 811-12, 115 S.E.2d at 24-25 ; see also Elmore v. … Ang ell v. City of Raleigh, 267 N.C. 387, 391 , 148 S.E.2d 233, 236 (1966); see also Gaston Board of Realtors v. Harrison, 311 N.C. 230, 234-35 , 316 S.E.2d 59, 62 (1984).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bryson v. HAYWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

    204 N.C. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2010

    Instead, like the Court in Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. … See Brown, 183 N.C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. ALLTRAN FINANCIAL, LP

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 8, 2022

    See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992); Bryant v. Woodall, 1 F.4th 280, 285 (4th Cir. 2021). … Brown has standing. See Docs. 22, 23. The parties cannot avoid the requirements of standing through consent, see Constantine v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Township Road Commission of No. 10 Township v. Board of Commissioners

    178 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1919

    Wittkowsky v. Comrs., 150 N. C., 90 . True we have held in Wagstaff v. Comrs., 177 N. C., 354 ; Gregg v. Comrs., 162 N. C., 479 ; Glenn v. Wray, 126 N. … Bennet v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 625 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Asheville v. Nettles

    164 N.C. 315 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

    Tbe charter of Asheville, Private Laws 1901, ch. 100, sec. 32, prescribes the powers and duties of the board of health of that city, and among other things provides: “Said joint board shall have authority, and power is hereby … He sold and delivered milk, it is true, to only one customer, Brown’s Creamery. But this required the same inspection and regulation of the defendant’s herd and of his milk as if he had sold to numerous customers.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • H. F. Mitchell Construction Co. v. Orange County Board of Education

    262 N.C. 295 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1964

    Reverie Lingerie, Inc. v. McCain, 258 N.C. 353 , 128 S.E. 2d 835 ; In re Simmons, 256 N.C. 184 , 123 S.E. 2d 614 ; Insurance Company v. Shaffer, 250 N.C. 45 , 108 S.E. 2d 49 ; Bradsher v. … Accepting as correct defendant’s contention that the judgment rendered in Winters’ suit against Construction Company was neither an estoppel, nor evidence against Board of Education that rock had been excavated, it does not

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Hines

    286 N.C. 377 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1975

    State v. McNeil, 280 N.C. 159 , 185 S.E. 2d 156 ; State v. Murphy, 280 N.C. 1 , 184 S.E. 2d 845 ; State v. Cooke, 278 N.C. 288 , 179 S.E. 2d 365 ; State v. Primes, supra; State v. … In S. v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Wilson Realty & Constr., Inc. v. Asheboro-Randolph Board of Realtors

    1997 NCBC 1 · North Carolina Business Court · Sep 30, 1997

    WILSON REALTY & CONSTR., INC. v. ASHEBORO-RANDOLPH BD. … of Realtors v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town & Country Civic Organization v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment

    83 N.C. App. 893 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1986

    Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , reh'g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980). … The established rules of the Board are binding on the Board itself, as well as on the public. Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E.2d 129 (1974).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE

    359 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 2005

    Robertson v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE. No. 65P05. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 3, 2005. Louis A. Bledsoe, Jr., Charlotte, for Mr. and Mrs. Robertson. Terri V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Humphrey v. Board of Trustees of I. O. O. F. Home

    203 N.C. 201 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1932

    Candler v. Board of Education, 181 N. C., 444 . The plaintiff does not question the clear meaning of the will, in this respect, but only maintains that it cannot be carried out. … 204 entirely upon tbe statutes above .mentioned., which provide: that three-fourths of the extra expense of teaching orphan children be paid out of the State equalization fund and one-fourth by the county, under which the board

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte

    359 N.C. 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 2005

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hooper v. Pizzagalli Construction Co.

    112 N.C. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1993

    Brown v. Texas Company, 237 N.C. 738 , 76 S.E.2d 45 (1953). … Neal v. Craig Brown, Inc., 86 N.C. App. 157, 158 , 356 S.E.2d 912, 913 , disc. review denied, 320 N.C. 794 , 361 S.E.2d 80 (1987).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Claybrook v. . Commissioners

    114 N.C. 454 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

    The exception as to issue or violation of constitutional provisions is expressly stated in Duke v. Brown , 96 N.C. 127 , and in R. R. v. Commissioners , 109 N.C. 159 . … Southerland v. Goldsboro , 96 N.C. 49 , and Duke v. Brown, supra . It does not appear that the ballots used did not follow the exact requirements of the statute.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clark v. . Homes

    189 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1925

    Staton , 78 N.C. 236 ; Lafoon v. Sherron , 91 N.C. 370 ; Morgan v. Bank , 93 N.C. 355 ; County Board v. State Board , 106 N.C. 81 ; Baruch v. Long , 117 N.C. 509 ; McNeill v. Currie , 117 N.C. 346 ; Hines v. … Brown v. Harding , 170 N.C. 253 ; Brown v. Harding , 171 N.C. 686 ; Morgan v. Bank, supra; McMinn v. Hamilton, supra; Lucas v. R. R. , 122 N.C. 937 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Holiday Inn Select

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 15, 2005

    Brown at Unifour Pain Management. 15. Plaintiff presented to Dr. Brown, a board-certified anesthesiologist and pain medicine doctor, on September 20, 2002. Dr. … William VanNess III, a board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Murphy-Brown, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 2021

    ) ) MURPHY-BROWN, LLC, ) … Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597– 98 (1978).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.