Case law

Christian Board of Publication v. Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor & Industrial Relations

279 S.W.2d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1955

.; Kansas City v. Rooney, 363 Mo. 902, 254 . S.W.2d 626; Michler v. Krey Packing Co., 363 Mo. 707 , 253 S.W.2d 136, 142 . … V.

State ex rel. Mayfair Home Ass'n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

690 S.W.2d 805 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1985

Board of President of the St. Louis Public School v. Estate of Broadway Savings Bank

84 Mo. 56 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Canada v. Thomas

915 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 2, 1996

Brown v. Nix, 33 F.3d 951, 953 (8th Cir.1994) (citation omitted). … See Brown, 33 F.3d at 954 ; Collins, 503 U.S. at 127-29 , 112 S.Ct. at 1070 .

State ex rel. George v. Board of Education of Anaconda School District

741 S.W.2d 747 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1987

Petitions to both boards of education signed by voters in only one of the affected districts have been allowed. See State ex rel. Doyle v. Littrell, 531 S.W.2d 52 (Mo.App.1975). … Clair’s interpretation of “voters in any district” (emphasis added) as allowing voters from each district to petition their board of education. See State ex rel. Kugler v.

Davis v. Forman

229 Mo. 27 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1910

[Bronson v. Wanzer, 86 Mo. 408 ; Keithley v. Keithley, 85 Mo. 217 .] It has been held that the verdict of a jury in such case is not a subject for examination on an appeal. [Weeks v. Senden, 54 Mo. 129 .] … Davis and Browning boarded at the same hotel, a pleasant social acquaintance sprang up between them, visits and social pleasures were exchanged between them and their wives.

State Ex Rel. Fred Weber, Inc. v. St. Louis County, Missouri Board of Zoning Adjustment

205 S.W.3d 296 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2006

Ode v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 796 S.W.2d 81, 83 (Mo.App. W.D.1990). … The scope of review is whether the decision of the zoning board was legal in the sense of being authorized by law and whether it is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. Eubanks v.

Stewart Ex Rel. Stewart v. Zuellig

336 S.W.2d 399 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1960

Huttig v. Brennan, 328 Mo. 471 , 41 S.W.2d 1054, 1062 ; Brown v. Moore, Mo.Sup., 248 S.W.2d 553, 556 (4). … And see Lasky v. Rudman, supra, 85 S.W.2d 501, 503 ; Lahtinen v. Continental Building Co., 339 Mo. 438 , 97 S.W.2d 102, 106 ; Grimmeissen v.

CITY OF ST. ROBERT, MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ALAN CLARK

471 S.W.3d 321 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2015

Ruggeri v. City of St. … Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Mo.App.WD.2007)).

St. Charles County v. Curators of the University of Missouri

25 S.W.3d 159 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 1, 2000

Charles County Board of Equalization. The Board, after each appeal, reinstated the tax-exempt status of the leasehold interests in the Research Park See Missouri Bluffs Golf Joint Venture v. St. … Jones v. Brown, 338 Mo. 448 , 92 S.W.2d 718, 722 (1936). In sum, section 172.273.3 violates Article X, section 6 of the Constitution. 3 III.

Bishop v. Colaw

316 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 24, 1970

Among the cases which held that school districts had a right to adopt reasonable regulations concerning hair are: Stevenson v. Wheeler County Board of Education, 306 F.Supp. 97 (S.D.Ga. 1969); Farrell v. … Brown, 299 F.Supp. 1360 (N.D.Ala. F.Supp. 1316 (D.Colo.1969); Calbillo v. 1967); Brick v. Board of Education, 305 San Jacinto Junior College, 305 F.Supp. 857 (S.D.Texas 1969); Westley v.

Opinion No. (1998)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 1998

Mayfield v. Brown Shoe Company , 941 S.W.2d 31 , 36 (Mo.App. 1997). … In Akin v.

Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Mayor's Commission on Human Rights of Springfield

791 S.W.2d 382 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1990

XV, § 15.1, provides: “All boards or commissions established by this Charter or under authority granted herein to the council shall be classified either as (1) advisory boards, established for the purposes of investigation … Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946, 955 , 290 S.W.2d 160, 166 (banc 1956).

Wright v. City of Salisbury, Mo.

656 F. Supp. 2d 1013 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 10, 2009

Brown, 574 F.3d at 499 (citing Kahle v. … Brown v. Fortner, 518 F.3d 552, 561 (8th Cir.2008) (quoting Young v. Selk, 508 F.3d 868, 875 (8th Cir.2007)).

State ex rel. Kizer v. Mennemeyer

421 S.W.3d 558 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2014

Dorsey v. Wilson, 263 S.W.3d 790, 791 (Mo.App.E.D.2008). A litigant seeking mandamus must allege and prove a clear, unequivocal, specific right to a thing claimed. State ex rel. Valentine v. … Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616, 618 (Mo. banc 2006); Dorsey, 263 S.W.3d at 791 .

Liddell v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.

814 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 4, 1993

814 F.Supp. 788 (1993) Craton LIDDELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, et al., Defendants. No. 72-0100C(6). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. … Liddell v. Board of Ed., 839 F.2d 400, 405 (8th Cir.1988) ( Liddell XIV ). The number of elementary school (K-5) transfer students in Ritenour during the 1991-92 school year was 130 (VICC's Oct. 1991 Quarterly Report).

Mesker Brothers Industries, Inc. v. Leachman

529 S.W.2d 153 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1975

In City of Henderson v. … Hopkins v. Brown Tobacco Co., 140 Mo. 218 , 41 S.W. 776 (1897), — but in any event it is of no force here. We are considering a manufacturers’ tax only.

State v. Hale

238 Mo. 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1911

It appears from the evidence that defendant, beginning in March previous to the homicide, boarded with the deceased, that they quarreled in May, and that defendant then went to board with the Sagers. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

Solien ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Merchants Home Delivery Service, Inc.

419 F. Supp. 957 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 1976

This matter is before the Court on request of the petitioner to issue a temporary restraining order to retain the status quo pending a decision by the National Labor Relations Board. … This is a matter for determination by the National Labor Relations Board.

Albers v. Merchants' Exchange

138 Mo. 140 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1897

Brown v. Cape Girardeau, 90 Mo. 377 ; Waters *160 v. Waters, 49 Mo. 385 ; Frissell v. Haile, 18 Mo. 18 ; Walker v. Borland, 21 Mo. 289 ; Haeussler v. Bank, 23 Mo. App. 282 . The decision in State ex rel. Patterson v. … Dickenson v. Chamber of Commerce, 29 Wis. 45 ; People ex rel. v. Chicago Board of Trade, 45 Ill. 113 ; People ex rel. Rice v. Board of Trade, 80 Ill. 134 ; People ex rel. Johnson v. N. Y. Produce Exchange, 44 N. E.