Case law

Lamar Oci South Corporation v. Stanly County Zoning Board of Adjustment

362 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

C'est Bon, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

325 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 13, 1971

After this citation was publicized, the Mecklenburg ABC Board met and on January 27, 1971, issued a statement to beer and “brown bag” licensees, which quite prudently recognized the current (and chronic) uncertainty as to … injunction against any state court proceeding is sought, and since the *406 harm threatened to plaintiff is both great and immediate as well as irreparable, equitable relief pendente lite is in order despite language in Younger v.

Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.

189 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1925

C., 12 ; Cloman v. Staton, 78 N. C., 236 ; Lafoon v. Sherron, 91 N. C., 370 ; Morgan v. Bank, 93 N. C., 355 ; County Board v. State Board, 106 N. C., 81 ; Baruch v. Long, 117 N. C., 509 ; McNeill v. Currie, 117 N. … Brown v. Harding, 170 N. C., 253 ; Brown v. Harding, 171 N. C., 686 ; Morgan v. Bank, supra; McMinn v. Hamilton, supra; Lucas v. R. R., 122 N. C., 937 .

Lamar Oci South Corporation v. Stanly County Zoning Board of Adjustment

669 S.E.2d 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008

Wilson Realty & Construction, Inc. v. Asheboro-Randolph Board of Realtors, Inc.

134 N.C. App. 468 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1999

Id.; Renner v. Hawk, 125 N.C. … The trial court thus correctly entered summary judgment on these claims for the Board. 5 See Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Constr.

Showcase Realty & Construction Co. v. City of Fayetteville Board of Adjustment

155 N.C. App. 548 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 (1980). … (citing Natrella v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Arlington County, 345 S.E.2d 295, 300 (Va. 1986)).

Zucker v. . Oettinger

179 N.C. 277 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1920

Brown, J. This is an action brought against the defendants to recover the balance due on account of goods sold and delivered. … Board of Education v. State Board, 106 N. C., 83 . The party desiring to move the cause can preserve his rights by filing his motion with the clerk before filing his answer. Such party can then file his answer.

Price v. . Pyatt

203 N.C. 799 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1933

In re Will of Brown, ante, 347. Testimony of a similar nature was held incompetent in the following-cases : Pulliam v. Hege, 192 N. C., 459 , 135 S. E., 288 (“I had to wait on her; ‘tote’ meals to her”) ; Knight v. … E., 779 (Feme plaintiff “gave deceased medicine, kept him clean and cared for him generally; he was helpless; we had to do all the services and wait on him”) ; Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , 93 S.

Ocean Acres Ltd. Partnership v. Dare County Board of Health

514 F. Supp. 1117 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 18, 1981

The moratorium remained in effect as a policy of the Dare County Board of Health until March, 1978, having been officially reaffirmed by the Board in October, 1975. … Prior to the Board’s decision to rescind the moratorium, representatives of the Board and the two towns discussed a jointly-funded hydrologic study of the pond and in June, 1978, the three defendants contracted with a private

School Committee of Seventy-First Consolidated School District v. Board of Education

186 N.C. 643 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1923

In Venable v. School Committee, 149 N. … Peters v. *648 Highway Com., 184 N. C., 30 ; Person v. Watts, 184 N. C., 506 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 ; Dula v. School Trustees, 177 N. C., 426 ; Newton v. School Committee, 158 N.

Burney v. . Comrs.

184 N.C. 274 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1922

the board of education of said county into one township high school district. … Board of Education v. Comrs. , 183 N.C. 300 . Barring certain exceptions, the general rule is that the Legislature may validate retrospectively any proceeding which it might have authorized in advance. Anderson v.

Capacchione Ex Rel. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

9 F. Supp. 2d 572 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 1998

United States v. Smith, 653 F.2d 126, 128 (4th Cir.1981) (citing Powell v. … Armstrong v.

Sugar Creek Charter School, Inc. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

667 S.E.2d 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

Fortune v. Southern Railway Co.

150 N.C. 695 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1909

Brown, J. Tbe evidence in this case tends to prove that tbe plaintiff accompanied her - husband to defendant’s station at Waynesville for tbe purpose of seeing him off as a passenger for Asheville. … Railroad v. Lawton, 55 Ark., 428; Packet Co. v. Wilson, 95 Tend.; 1 Hutchinson on Carriers, sec. 237; Whitley v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 987 ; Morrow v. Railroad; 134 N. C., 92 ; Moore v. Railroad, 119 Mich., 613 .

Weaver v. . Hampton

201 N.C. 798 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1931

Morris v. Patterson, 180 N. C., 484 , 105 S. E., 25 ; Board of Education v. Commissioners, 192 N. C., 274 , 134 S. E., 852 . … Hoggard v. Brown, 192 N. C., 494 , 135 S. E., 331 ; Hawkins v. Carter, 196 N. C., 538 , 146 S. E., 231 .

Ornoff v. City of Durham

221 N.C. 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1942

Besseliew v. Brown, 171 N. C., 65, 97 S. E., 743 , and cases there cited. … Poole v. Board of Examiners, ante, 199, 19 S. E. (2d), 635 , and cases there cited.

Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Juno Construction Corp.

64 N.C. App. 158 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1983

The trial court’s denial of the motion to amend was affirmed by this court in Board of Education v. … La Grenade v. Gordon, 60 N.C. App. 650 , 299 S.E. 2d 809 (1983); see also Complex, Inc. v. Furst and Furst v. Camilco, Inc. and Camilco, Inc. v. Furst, 57 N.C.

Cockerham Ex Rel. Cockerham v. Stokes County Board of Education

302 F. Supp. 2d 490 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 3, 2004

But see Brown v. … Seamons v. Snow, 84 F.3d 1226, 1232 (10th Cir.1996); Brown v. Hot. Sexy & Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540 (1st Cir.1995); Jennings v. University of *497 N.C. at Chapel Hill, 240 F.Supp.2d 492 , 509 (M.D.N.C.2002).

State v. Bonner

203 N.C. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 2010

State v. Brown, 110 N.C. … The Board, as rightful beneficiary of the forfeiture funds, is a party aggrieved by a court order setting aside an order of forfeiture. See Culton v.

Bryson v. HAYWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

204 N.C. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2010

Instead, like the Court in Brown v. Am. Partners Fed. Credit Union, 183 N.C. … See Brown, 183 N.C.