Case law

Cannon v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington

65 N.C. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 1983

The duty of the Superior Court in reviewing the decision of a town board sitting as a quasi-judicial body was succinctly enunciated by Justice Carlton in Concrete Co. v. … Examination of the Board’s conclusions clearly reveals that the Board did not base its decision on the ground *49 that Mr. Cannon’s growth in business amounted to expansion of a nonconforming use.

Weaverville Partners, LLC v. Town of Weaverville Zoning Board of Adjustment

188 N.C. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

“A legislative body such as the Board, when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body.” Sun Suites Holdings, L.L.C. v. Board of Aldermen of Garner, 139 N.C. … Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 468 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 136 (1974). Substantial evidence has been defined as: Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla.

Morris Communications Corp. v. City of Bessemer City Zoning Board of Adjustment

202 N.C. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 2010

judgment for that of the [Board]. … V.

Stephens Ex Rel. Stephens v. Jackson County Board of Education

244 N.C. 481 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1956

Weston v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

169 N.C. 398 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 29, 1915

In Barrow v. … Cited: Propst v. Caldwell , 172 N.C. 597 ; Olds v. Cedar Works , 173 N.C. 161 , 163 , 167 ; Hutton v. Horton , 178 N.C. 551 ; Cedar Works v. Shepard , 181 N.C. 17 . *Page 474

State Ex Rel. Barker v. Palmer

217 N.C. 519 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1940

Spain v. Hines, 214 N. C., 432 (437). In The People ex rel. Lemon v. Elmore, 256 N. … Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141 N. C., 615 ; Shelby v. Power Co., 155 N. C., 196 ; Reed v. Engineering Co., 188 N. C., 39 .” New trial.

Safety Mutual Casualty Corp. v. Spears, Barnes, Baker, Wainio, Brown & Whaley

104 N.C. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1991

Hardbarger v. Deal, 258 N.C. 31, 35 , 127 S.E.2d 771, 774 (1962) (quoting Rochester v. Tulp, 54 Wash. 2d 71 , 337 P.2d 1062 (1959)). … Barnhardt v. Morrison, 178 N.C. 563, 568 , 101 S.E. 218, 221 (1919) (quoting Adams and Freese Co. v. Kenoyer, 16 L.R.A. (N.S.) 683).

Appalachian Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Town of Boone Board of Adjustment

128 N.C. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1997

CG & T Corp. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Wilmington, 105 N.C. App. 32, 36 , 411 S.E.2d 655, 658 (1992) (citing Jennewein v. City Council, 62 N.C. … Coastal Ready-Mix v. Board of Com’rs, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980).

Morrison v. BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS OF STATE OF NC

360 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 4, 2005

See Goldfarb v. … See, e.g., Hawkins v. Moss, 503 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir.1974); Brown v.

Northeast Motor Co. v. N. C. State Board of Alcoholic Control

35 N.C. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1978

San-tobello v. New York, supra. And the same is true even when the promises are not within the power of the prosecutor to make, and hence, are unfulfillable. Palermo v. … Santobello v. New York, supra. Only he can now be heard to complain. In the lower court’s order affirming respondent Board’s suspension of petitioner’s ABC permits, we find no error. Affirmed.

Trustees of the Normal School v. State Board of Education

166 N.C. 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1914

Moore, trustee and secretary, applied for aid to tbe State Board of Education through its local board of managers in Elizabeth City. … Bowers v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 604 and 607; Rollins v. Ebbs, 138 N. C., 140 ; R. R. v. Kitchen, 91 N. C., 39 ; Dair v. United States, 83 U. S., 1 ; Butler v. U. S., 88 U. S., 272 .

Robertson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the City of Charlotte

167 N.C. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2004

V. … Craver v. Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40, 43 , 147 S.E.2d 599, 601 (1966). Relying on Refining Co. v.

Bryant v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

338 N.C. 288 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1994

The Court of Appeals relied on its decision in Carter v. N.C. State Bd. for Professional Engineers, 86 N.C. … Cobey v. Simpson, 333 N.C. 81, 90 , 423 S.E.2d 759, 763 (1992). Accordingly, we hold that plaintiff is entitled to a hearing and decision from the Board on the charges.

Floyd S. Pike Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Goodwill Missionary Baptist Church

25 N.C. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1975

Rector v. Fleming, 174 Misc. 473 , 20 N.Y.S. 2d 597 . (Sup. Ct., Special Term, where the court discusses this issue), aff'd, 260 App. … In Fishel and Taylor v. Church, 22 N.C.

Price v. . Pyatt

203 N.C. 799 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 4, 1933

In re Will of Brown, ante, 347. Testimony of a similar nature was held incompetent in the following-cases : Pulliam v. Hege, 192 N. C., 459 , 135 S. E., 288 (“I had to wait on her; ‘tote’ meals to her”) ; Knight v. … E., 779 (Feme plaintiff “gave deceased medicine, kept him clean and cared for him generally; he was helpless; we had to do all the services and wait on him”) ; Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , 93 S.

Lamar Oci South Corporation v. Stanly County Zoning Board of Adjustment

669 S.E.2d 322 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008

Baker v. NC Psychology Bd.

822 S.E.2d 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 23, 2019

Wilson Realty & Construction, Inc. v. Asheboro-Randolph Board of Realtors, Inc.

134 N.C. App. 468 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1999

Id.; Renner v. Hawk, 125 N.C. … The trial court thus correctly entered summary judgment on these claims for the Board. 5 See Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Constr.

Francine Delany New School for Children, Inc. v. Asheville City Board of Education

150 N.C. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 2002

Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520 , 507 S.E.2d 894 (1998). … Brown, 349 N.C. at 522 , 507 S.E.2d at 895 . If the language of a statute is unambiguous on its face, then we must construe the statute according to its plain meaning. Lutz v.

PNE AOA Media, L.L.C. v. Jackson County

146 N.C. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2001

The common law vested rights doctrine “ ‘has evolved as a constitutional limitation on the state’s exercise of its police power[s].’ ” Browning-Ferris Industries v. Guilford County Bd. of Adj., 126 N.C. … Browning-Ferris, 126 N.C.