Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.40s

  • De Young v. Brown

    300 Or. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2019

    Brown POWERS, J. … Brown has vindicated an important constitutional right applying to all citizens without any personal gain (the “constitutional” theory), Pendleton School Dist. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Brown

    116 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1925

    said Brown. … This does not vitiate his lien: 2 Jones on Liens (3 ed.), 642, § 1413, 644, § 1415; Bartels v. McCullough et al., 102 Or. 66 ( 201 Pac. 733 ). Malone v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC

    323 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 2022

    Reversed and remanded. 216 Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC POWERS, J. … Accordingly, we omit the year in all remaining refer- ences to former ORS 97.300 in this opinion. 230 Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mills v. Brown

    81 Or. App. 458 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 8, 1986

    Peterson v. Mult Co. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 64 Or App 81 , 668 P2d 385 , rev den 295 Or 773 (1983), was issued shortly before the trial in this case. … ORS 18.485; see Stovall v. Perius, 61 Or App 650, 661 , 659 P2d 393 , rev den 294 Or 792 (1983).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hill

    337 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 2004

    95 P.3d 728 (2004) 337 Or. 247 BROWN v. HILL S51497. Supreme Court of Oregon. July 20, 2004. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    212 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2007

    Defendant also argues that the departure sentence violates the Sixth Amendment under the principles articulated in Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296 , 124 S Ct 2531 , 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. … Under our decision in State v. Ramirez, 205 Or App 113 , 133 P3d 343 , adh’d to on recons, 207 Or App 1 , 139 P3d 981 (2006), rev allowed, 342 Or 256 (2007), the sentence is plainly erroneous.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Portland

    73 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1914

    The case is governed by the principles announced in Hochfeld v. Portland, 72 Or. 190 ( 142 Pac. 824 ), and Cook v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moore

    3 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Studer v. Brown

    244 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1966

    Brown, Thatcher’s mother, signed the order for the boys and agreed to hold the supplier harmless for any damage or injury arising out of the use of the chemicals. Mrs. … Brown knew the chemicals were explosive, and that the boys intended to create explosions with them.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bryant

    250 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

    Fletcher v. Walters, 246 Or. 362 , 425 P2d 539 ; Gray v. Galantha, 235 Or 521 , 385 P2d 746 ; Burghardt v. Olson, 223 Or 155 , 349 P2d 792 , 354 P2d 871 ; Williamson v. McKenna, 223 Or 366 , 354 P2d 56 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cupp

    31 Or. App. 1237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1977

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Whittington

    39 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901

    This was no more than Shull could have compelled Brown to do. Mr. … Conv. (3 ed.), § 301; Marks v. Crow, 14 Or. 382 ( 13 Pac. 55 ); Bank of Colfax v. Richardson, 34 Or. 518 ( 75 Am. St. Rep. 664 , 54 Pac. 359 ); Horton v. Dewey, 53 Wis. 410 , 10 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Thompson

    177 Or. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2001

    We affirmed without discussion, citing Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12 , 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. … Appellant contends that our disposition of his case is inconsistent with Christenson v. Thompson, 176 Or App 54 , 31 P3d 449 (2001), and Newcomb v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Brown

    282 Or. 499 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1978

    See, e.g., Quillin v. Peloquin, 237 Or 343, 346-347 , 391 P2d 603 (1964); Salem King’s Products Co. v. Ramp, 100 or 329, 355, 196 P 401 (1921). See also Russell v. … Brown testified to their recollections of the negotiations in 1964.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Haverfield

    276 Or. 911 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1976

    Brown” ORS 696.030(1) is set out in footnote 2 supra. The legislative history of ORS 696.030(1) supports this interpretation of the statute. … John Black, President of the Salem Board of Realtors, testified that "The problem is that the law permits an owner or his 'regular employees’ to sell his property.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Schiedler

    198 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 2005

    ORS 138.620(2); Trujillo v. Maass, 312 Or 431, 435 , 822 P2d 703 (1991). … Strickland v. Washington, 466 US 668, 687-88 , 104 S Ct 2052 , 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). We are bound by the findings of fact of the post-conviction court if they are supported by the record. Lichau v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • De Young v. Brown

    297 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2019

    See Wyers v. … See, e.g. , Moro v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Anderson-Brown

    277 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 2016

    State v. Walker, 350 Or 540, 552 , 258 P3d 1228 (2011). … State v. Brown, 100 Or App 204 , 208 n 4, 785 P2d 790 , rev den, 309 Or 698 (1990); see State v. Hatfield, 246 Or App 736, 743 , 268 P3d 654 , rev den, 352 Or 341 (2011) (collecting cases). Affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pettinari

    165 Or. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 26, 2000

    See Little Donkey Enterprises, Inc. v. … See Wilson v. Steel Tank & Pipe Co., 152 Or 386, 395-402 , 52 P2d 1120 (1936). The court explained in Krushwitz v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Transcon Lines

    284 Or. 597 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1978

    The plaintiff in that case had made a request to the Public Employe Relations Board (PERB) that it reclassify her as a Revenue Agent 2, contending that she was doing the duties of that position and that she had been denied … Matthews, 201 Minn 113, 275 NW 698, 700 (1937); Urbach v. Urbach, 52 Wyo 207, 73 P2d 953, 961 (1937); State v. Barney, 133 Neb 676, 276 NW 676, 683 (1937); Rennie v.

    Cited 120 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.