Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.60s
29 N.C. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1976
Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971) ; 5 N. C. Index 2d, Master and Servant, § 10, p. 327. There is no allegation in the instant case concerning the duration or means of termination of the employment. … Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 289 N.C. 71 , 221 S.E. 2d 282 (1976). We also agree with defendant’s position that the doctrine of promissory estoppel does not apply in this action for breach of employment contract.
Cited 12 timesPublished199 N.C. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009
The caller said he knew who killed the man and then identified the persons involved in the murder as Chris Scott and his roommate Henry Brown (defendant). … State v. Kincaid, 147 N.C. App. 94, 97 , 555 S.E.2d 294, 297 (2001) (quoting State v. Brooks, 337 N.C. 132, 140-41 , 446 S.E.2d 579, 585 (1994)).
Cited 10 timesPublished210 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1936
See Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 , and Greensboro v. Guilford County, 209 N. C., 655 , 184 S. E., 473 . … In such case, the board of county commissioners is performing the duty which the Constitution imposes upon said board in the first instance. In Reeves v.
Cited 6 timesPublished218 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940
The Board of Aldermen *353 of tbe City of Concord do ordain: Section 1. … S. v. Prevo, 178 N. C., 740 , citing S. v. Webber, 107 N. C., 962 .”
Cited 5 timesPublished238 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953
S. v. Barnhardt, 230 N.C. 223 , 52 S.E. 2d 904 ; also S. v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236 , 66 S.E. 2d 907 . And possession, within the meaning of the statute, may be either actual or constructive. See S. v. … Webb, 233 N.C. 382 , 64 S.E. 2d 268 , and cases cited; also S. v. Parker, supra, and cases cited. Hence in the judgment from which this appeal is taken, there is found No error.
Cited 4 timesPublished207 N.C. 807 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1935
Hampton v. Spinning Co., 198 N. C., 235 ; Ferguson v. … Sanders v. Sanders, 201 N. C., 350 ; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788 . Affirmed.
Cited 7 timesPublished131 N.C. 828 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1902
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text136 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1904
Kiff v. Kiff, supra. … See also Brown v. Morris, 83 N. C., 251 , and Ice Co. v. Coal Co., 134 N. C., 574 . In Thigpen v. Leigh, supra, it appeared that the lessee “of his own accord abandoned the crop in Tune.”
Cited 7 timesPublished80 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1879
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text143 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1906
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text122 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1898
C., 145 ; Long v. Crews, 113 N. C., 256 ; Duke v. Markham, supra, Todd v. Outlaw, 79 N. C., 235 ; DeCourcy v. Barr, 45 N. C., 181 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 700 . The very able brief of the defendants’ counsel concedes that The Code, Sections 433-436, inclusive, require docketing “in order to secure a lien for that purpose alone.”
Cited 12 timesPublished162 N.C. 217 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1913
Brown, if she did not acquire an absolute estate in fee, was given a power - to appoint absolutely in fee, and the exercise of the power will vest in the purchaser such an estate. Troy v. Troy, supra; Alexander v. … McDowell v. Brown, 68 N. C., 65 . We have said that Mrs.
Cited 9 timesPublished196 N.C. 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1929
suppression of tbe truth or tbe suggestion of what is false can be proved, in a fact material to tbe contract, tbe party injured may have relief against tbe contract.” 18 Johns., 405 ; Black’s Law Diet., p. 1040; McNair v.
Cited 6 timesPublished184 N.C. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2007
Ellis appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding compensatory and punitive damages to plaintiff William Lawson Brown, III for alienation of affections. … Skinner v. Preferred Credit, 361 N.C. 114, 119 , 638 S.E.2d 203, 208 (2006).
Cited 3 timesPublished2 N.C. 378 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1796
On the part of the defendants it was proven that they delivered to Brown some bonds and accounts due to them, the defendants, from persons (379) resident in South Carolina, where Brown lived; and he gave them a writing purporting … This is proved by Chamberlyn v. Delarive , cited at the bar from 2 Wils., 353.
Cited 15 timesPublished196 N.C. 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1929
Brown, indebted to the plaintiff by reason of breach of warranty of title? Answer (by consent): $400 with interest from 1 February, 1928. 2. … suppression of the truth or the suggestion of what is false can be proved, in a fact material to the contract, the party injured may have relief against the contract." 18 Johns., 405 ; Black's Law Dict., P. 1040; McNair v.
Cited 5 timesPublished218 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940
Brown, Treasurer of the city of Concord, for refund of $25.00 taxi license paid on 29 June, 1939. … The Board of Aldermen *Page 353 of the City of Concord do ordain: Section 1.
Cited 5 timesPublished226 N.C. 762 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1946
See S. v. Britt, 225 N. C., 364 , 34 S. E. (2d), 408 , in opinion by Denny, J., where the authorities are assembled. The question may not be presented on exception to charge as given. … See Jones v. Jones, 80 N. C., 246 ; Bowman v. Blankenship, 165 N. C., 519 , 81 S. E., 746 ; Stansbury on North Carolina Evidence, section 50, p. 79. In the Jones case, Smith, C.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna