Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.60s

  • Tatum v. Brown

    29 N.C. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1976

    Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971) ; 5 N. C. Index 2d, Master and Servant, § 10, p. 327. There is no allegation in the instant case concerning the duration or means of termination of the employment. … Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 289 N.C. 71 , 221 S.E. 2d 282 (1976). We also agree with defendant’s position that the doctrine of promissory estoppel does not apply in this action for breach of employment contract.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    199 N.C. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2009

    The caller said he knew who killed the man and then identified the persons involved in the murder as Chris Scott and his roommate Henry Brown (defendant). … State v. Kincaid, 147 N.C. App. 94, 97 , 555 S.E.2d 294, 297 (2001) (quoting State v. Brooks, 337 N.C. 132, 140-41 , 446 S.E.2d 579, 585 (1994)).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Marshburn v. Brown

    210 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1936

    See Hickory v. Catawba County, 206 N. C., 165 , 173 S. E., 56 , and Greensboro v. Guilford County, 209 N. C., 655 , 184 S. E., 473 . … In such case, the board of county commissioners is performing the duty which the Constitution imposes upon said board in the first instance. In Reeves v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Brown

    218 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940

    The Board of Aldermen *353 of tbe City of Concord do ordain: Section 1. … S. v. Prevo, 178 N. C., 740 , citing S. v. Webber, 107 N. C., 962 .”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    238 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 23, 1953

    S. v. Barnhardt, 230 N.C. 223 , 52 S.E. 2d 904 ; also S. v. Parker, 234 N.C. 236 , 66 S.E. 2d 907 . And possession, within the meaning of the statute, may be either actual or constructive. See S. v. … Webb, 233 N.C. 382 , 64 S.E. 2d 268 , and cases cited; also S. v. Parker, supra, and cases cited. Hence in the judgment from which this appeal is taken, there is found No error.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Johnson

    207 N.C. 807 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1935

    Hampton v. Spinning Co., 198 N. C., 235 ; Ferguson v. … Sanders v. Sanders, 201 N. C., 350 ; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. C., 788 . Affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Brown

    131 N.C. 828 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1902

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Parker v. Brown.

    136 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1904

    Kiff v. Kiff, supra. … See also Brown v. Morris, 83 N. C., 251 , and Ice Co. v. Coal Co., 134 N. C., 574 . In Thigpen v. Leigh, supra, it appeared that the lessee “of his own accord abandoned the crop in Tune.”

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nowland v. Brown

    80 N.C. 487 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1879

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Railway

    143 N.C. 697 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1906

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Bernhardt v. Brown

    122 N.C. 587 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1898

    C., 145 ; Long v. Crews, 113 N. C., 256 ; Duke v. Markham, supra, Todd v. Outlaw, 79 N. C., 235 ; DeCourcy v. Barr, 45 N. C., 181 . … Bernhardt v. Brown, 118 N. C., 700 . The very able brief of the defendants’ counsel concedes that The Code, Sections 433-436, inclusive, require docketing “in order to secure a lien for that purpose alone.”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Brown

    368 N.C. 248 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mabry v. . Brown

    162 N.C. 217 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1913

    Brown, if she did not acquire an absolute estate in fee, was given a power - to appoint absolutely in fee, and the exercise of the power will vest in the purchaser such an estate. Troy v. Troy, supra; Alexander v. … McDowell v. Brown, 68 N. C., 65 . We have said that Mrs.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Isler v. Brown

    196 N.C. 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1929

    suppression of tbe truth or tbe suggestion of what is false can be proved, in a fact material to tbe contract, tbe party injured may have relief against tbe contract.” 18 Johns., 405 ; Black’s Law Diet., p. 1040; McNair v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ellis

    184 N.C. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2007

    Ellis appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding compensatory and punitive damages to plaintiff William Lawson Brown, III for alienation of affections. … Skinner v. Preferred Credit, 361 N.C. 114, 119 , 638 S.E.2d 203, 208 (2006).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Craig

    2 N.C. 378 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1796

    On the part of the defendants it was proven that they delivered to Brown some bonds and accounts due to them, the defendants, from persons (379) resident in South Carolina, where Brown lived; and he gave them a writing purporting … This is proved by Chamberlyn v. Delarive , cited at the bar from 2 Wils., 353.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Brown

    368 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Isler v. . Brown

    196 N.C. 685 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1929

    Brown, indebted to the plaintiff by reason of breach of warranty of title? Answer (by consent): $400 with interest from 1 February, 1928. 2. … suppression of the truth or the suggestion of what is false can be proved, in a fact material to the contract, the party injured may have relief against the contract." 18 Johns., 405 ; Black's Law Dict., P. 1040; McNair v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cox v. . Brown

    218 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1940

    Brown, Treasurer of the city of Concord, for refund of $25.00 taxi license paid on 29 June, 1939. … The Board of Aldermen *Page 353 of the City of Concord do ordain: Section 1.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Loftis

    226 N.C. 762 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 27, 1946

    See S. v. Britt, 225 N. C., 364 , 34 S. E. (2d), 408 , in opinion by Denny, J., where the authorities are assembled. The question may not be presented on exception to charge as given. … See Jones v. Jones, 80 N. C., 246 ; Bowman v. Blankenship, 165 N. C., 519 , 81 S. E., 746 ; Stansbury on North Carolina Evidence, section 50, p. 79. In the Jones case, Smith, C.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.