Case law

Brown v. United States

327 A.2d 539 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1974

For this proposition, appellant cites three recent holdings of the United States Court of Appeals for this circuit, United States v. Greene, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 9 , 429 F.2d 193 (1970); United States v. … The majority opinion in reaching this result cited Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); Gilbert v.

Brown v. United States

766 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2001

Brown's claim that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, cf. Riley v. … See Yee v.

Brown v. Commissioner

697 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 15, 2017

United States v. Brown

24 F. Cas. 1247 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1835

Brown v. United States

542 A.2d 1231 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1988

Brown’s contention that there was insufficient evidence of a "usable amount" of marijuana in the cigarette is meritless. Richardson v. United States, 366 A.2d 433, 434 (D.C.1976); Jones v. … Griffith v.

Reynolds v. Brown

690 F. App'x 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2017

Brown v. United States

985 A.2d 462 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2009

985 A.2d 462 (2009) BROWN v. U.S. No. 07-CF-564. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. December 23, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Brown v. MD COURTS

985 A.2d 463 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2009

985 A.2d 463 (2009) BROWN v. MD COURTS. No. 07-CV-1200. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. December 14, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Dismissed, denied and affirmed.

Brown v. Green

781 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 24, 1991

Brown as a result of the miscarriage which was, in itself, painful. *39 In Williams v. … Brown’s pregnancy may in itself be considered a physical harm that could place Ms. Brown in the zone of danger.

Brown v. Rudberg

171 F.2d 831 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 1948

The plaintiffs, Rudberg and O’Neill, and defendant Brown entered into a written “Agreement”, whereby Brown agreed to sell and the plaintiffs agreed to buy the defendant’s liquor store located in the District of Columbia. … See. 32 of Rules and Regulations of Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia, pursuant to 48 Stat. 322 (1934), D.C.Code § 25 — 107 (1940).

Brown v. Marsh

707 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 1989

In McKenzie v. Kennickell, 669 F.Supp. 529 (D.D.C.1987), and in Jurgens v. … Brown’s fee application is adequately supported; the Army’s opposition is not. See NAACP v.

Johnson v. Brown

26 F. Supp. 2d 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 1998

See Johnson v. … In Woodman v.

Brown v. Hill

686 F. App'x 6 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 2017

Hartz Mountain Corporation v. Donald L. Dotson, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board

727 F.2d 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1984

In Leedom v. … In Bell & Howell Co. v.

Brown v. United States

973 A.2d 732 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2009

973 A.2d 732 (2009) BROWN v. U.S. No. 06-CF-1255. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. June 29, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed and remanded.

Brown v. United States

304 A.2d 21 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1973

Jackson v. State, 10 Md.App. 337, 344 , 270 A.2d 322, 326 (1970); Carter v. State, 10 Md.App. 50, 52 , 267 A.2d 743, 745 (1970); cf. Nelson v. United States, D.C. Mun.App., 142 A.2d 604 (1958).

Brown v. Hecht Co.

49 F. Supp. 528 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 1943

Jacksonville Paper Company, 5 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 395 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Motor Company, 5 Cir., 1941, 119 F.2d 326 ; Walling v. … Builders’ Veneer & Woodwork Co., D.C.E.D.Wis.1942, 45 F.Supp. 808 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Boss Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 574 .

United States v. Brown

737 A.2d 1016 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1999

By way of illustration it points to Hawkins v. … See also State v.

Miller v. Health Services for Children Foundation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2009

Co. v. … Opp. at 22; Turner v. Federal Express Corp., 539 F.Supp.2d 404, 408-409 (D.D.C. 2008) (“Under settled District of Columbia law, [r]eports to the unemployment compensation board (a.k.a.

Brown v. United States

966 A.2d 398 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2009

966 A.2d 398 (2009) BROWN v. U.S. No. 06-CF-687. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. February 27, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.