Case law

Davis v. Brown

513 So. 2d 1001 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 21, 1987

That the school board owned the property adjoining the lot that Davis purchased. 4. That Brown told Davis that she could change the plans of the house. 5. … There is also evidence, including Brown's testimony, that at no time during the negotiations did the school board own the property and that Brown was aware of this fact.

Brown v. Butts

214 So. 3d 1181 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 12, 2016

Holt v. Davidson, 388 So.2d 548 (Ala.1980). … See Antram v. Stuyvesant Life Ins.

Brown v. Terry

375 So. 2d 457 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 28, 1979

United Security Life Insurance Co. v. Birmingham Trust Nat. Bank , 282 Ala. 295 , 211 So.2d 139 (1968); Maner v. Maner, Jr. , 279 Ala. 652 , 189 So.2d 336 (1966); Bromberg v. First Nat. … Rowe v. Johnson , 214 Ala. 510 , 108 So. 604 (1926); Clark v. Whitfield , 213 Ala. 441 , 105 So. 200 (1925). Privity would be lacking here.

Steele v. Brown

70 Ala. 235 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881

—Pollard v. Cocke, 19 Ala. 188 . … —Beavers v. Smith, 11 Ala. 20 ; Slatter v. Meek, 35 Ala. 528 .

Brown v. State

31 Ala. App. 529 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1944

As to appellant Luther Brown, we find only the visit to the “beer joint” and the finding of the oil can behind the sign board. … Title 15, § 307, Ala.Code 1940; Lindsey v. State, 170 Ala. 80 , 54 So. 516 ; Ross v. State, 74 Ala. 532 ; Commander v. State, 28 Ala.App. 42 , 178 So. 241 ; King v. State, 23 Ala.App. 55 , 120 So. 466 .

Brown v. State

55 Ala. 123 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1876

Tbe eases of Donohoo v. The State, 36 Ala. 281 , and Walker v. The State, 52 Ala. 376 , are relied on in support of tbe charge in this case. … See Com. v. Strupney, 105 Mass. 588 ; Roscoe’s Cr.Ev. 347. Under tbe rules above declared, tbe Circuit Court erred in tbe explanatory charge given. Reversed and remanded.

Brown v. Fogarty

221 Ala. 283 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 10, 1930

It is not very clear; neither is count 1 in Hart v. … Adler v. Miller, supra. And, as there said: “It should set forth the conditions on which the right of the action ex contractu for personal injury rests, as stated in Hart v. Coleman, supra.”

Coleman v. Brown

5 Ala. App. 673 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 30, 1912

Brown v. State

22 Ala. App. 661 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1927

Brown v. State

27 Ala. App. 618 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1935

Brown v. State

21 Ala. App. 663 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1926

Brown v. State

27 Ala. App. 617 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1936

Brown v. State

22 Ala. App. 661 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 10, 1927

Brown v. State

26 Ala. App. 624 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1935

Brown v. State

171 So. 3d 102 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 3, 2014

Lockhart v. … See Missouri v.

Brown v. State

206 Ala. 546 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 27, 1921

Pryor v. Brown

209 Ala. 701 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 19, 1923

Brown v. State

11 So. 3d 866 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jun 29, 2007

The record fails to show that E.V.’s brother-in-law had any connection to Brown’s case. In McGahee v. … Hagler to testify that when he attempted to locate Brown he found that Brown was in the custody of the Birmingham Police Department. In Barnes v.

Brown v. State

331 So. 2d 820 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 4, 1976

Burgess v. State , 256 Ala. 5 , 53 So.2d 568 ; Pruitt v. State , 232 Ala. 421 , 168 So. 149 . In Burgess v. … Mosley v. State , 54 Ala. App. 59 , 304 So.2d 613 ; Brown v. State , 229 Ala. 58 , 155 So. 358 ; Gillis v. State , 242 Ala. 550 , 7 So.2d 563 .

Brown v. Hay

1 Stew. & P. 102 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 15, 1831

-James- Brown died intestate, leaving no wife or child; but left two sisters,. the wives of the present defendants, and his father Allen Brown, the plaintiff. … Thus the ascent of the sisters to Allen Brown, the plaintiff, and corn mon aiice~tor, is one degree: the descent. from him to a level with the deceased bro-tl~er, would be another degree, whereas the ascent from the deceaced