Case law

Martin Marietta Corp. v. Forsyth County Zoning Board of Adjustment

65 N.C. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1983

Gower v. Insurance Co., 281 N.C. 577, 580 , 189 S.E. 2d 165, 167 (1972); see also Gaskins v. Insurance Co., 260 N.C. 122, 124 , 131 S.E. 2d 872, 873 (1963). … Swenson v. Assurance Co., 33 N.C. App. 458, 465 , 235 S.E. 2d 793, 797 (1977). “When a court has no authority to act, its acts are void.” Russell v. Manufacturing Co., 266 N.C. 531, 534 , 146 S.E. 2d 459, 461 (1966).

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Waugh

207 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 1935

Houghton v. Newberry, 69 N. C., 456 ; Webb v. Taylor, 80 N. C., 305 ; Moore v. Brady, 125 N. C., 35 (37). … Webb v. Taylor, 80 N. C., 305 .

Bullington v. North Carolina State Board of Examiners in Optometry

79 N.C. App. 750 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1986

The subpoena authority of the Board is limited to “any hearing, investigation or proceeding conducted by it.” G.S. 90-117.4. … The authority of the Board to enforce its subpoena power necessarily must be decided on a case-by-case basis.

Credle v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 9, 2008

Stat. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Pulley v. Rex Hospital , 326 N.C. 701 , 392 S.E.2d 380 (1990).

Earnhardt v. Southern Railway Co.

157 N.C. 358 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1911

R. v. Sturgeon, 120 N. C., 225 , has been approved in R. R. v. Olive, 142 N. C., 272 ; Parks v. R. R., 143 N. C., 293 ; R. R. v. New Bern, 147 N. C., 168 ; Muse v. R. R., 149 N. C., 446 , and in other cases. … R. v. McCaskill, 94 N. C., 146 ; Muse v. R. R., 149 N. C., 446 .

Board of Commissioners v. R. S. Dickson & Co.

190 N.C. 330 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 21, 1925

Co. v. Simm ons, 97 N. C., 89 ; Smith v. Mfg. Co., 151 N. C., 260 ; Jones v. R. R., 153 N. C., 419 ; Davis v. Wall, 142 N. C., 450 . Affirmed.

Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

503 F. Supp. 2d 776 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 2, 2007

Whatley], and Cynthia Brown, M.D. [Dr. Brown] and upon Plaintiffs response to Magistrate Judge William A. Webb’s order of March 15, 2006 [DE-52] allowing in part the Defendants’ Amended Motion to Compel [DE-36]. … Brown to act as chair of the Ad Hoc Committee.

Sparks v. . Willis

228 N.C. 25 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1947

Yokeley v. Kearns, 223 N. C., 196 , 25 S. E. (2d), 602 ; Smith v. Miller, 209 N. C., 170 , 86 S. E., 1036 ; S. v. Gray, 180 N. C., 697 (710), 104 S. E., 647 . … Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 227 N. C., 412 , 42 S. E. (2d), 593 . “The standard of conduct required in an emergency as elsewhere is that of the prudent man.” Ingle v. Cassady, 208 N. C., 497 , 181 S. E., 562 .

Coates v. Durham Cty.

266 N.C. App. 271 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2019

Brown & Bunch, PLLC, by LeAnn Nease Brown, for petitioners-appellees. Morningstar Law Group, by Jeffrey L. Roether and Patrick L. Byker, for respondent-appellant Hubrich Contracting, Inc. … App. [502,] 504, 462 S.E.2d [696,] 698 (1995) (appeal of superior court’s remand to a licensing board for rehearing dismissed as interlocutory); Jennewein v.

Crosby v. Bowers

87 N.C. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1987

Kelly v. International Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153 , 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). … Coleman v. Shirlen, 53 N.C. App. 573 , 281 S.E. 2d 431 (1981).

Taylor v. LENOIR

353 N.C. 695 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2001

Smith, Individually, and for the benefit of and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. … Brown, Thomas P. Deighton, James M. Floyd, Raymond Higgins, and Ricky E. Shehan. Groome, Tuttle, Pike & Blair, Lenoir, by Edward H. Blair, Jr., for defendant-appellee City of Lenoir. Roy A.

Morris Communications Corp. v. CITY OF BESSEMER CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

364 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2010

701 S.E.2d 668 (2010) MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS CORP. d/b/a Fairway Outdoor Advertising v. CITY OF BESSEMER CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. No. 150A10. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 26, 2010. Craig D. … Smith, III, Gastonia, for City of Bessemer City Zoning Board. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 689 S.E.2d 880 .

Learning center/ogden School, Inc. v. Cherokee County Board of Education

365 N.C. 547 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 26, 2012

720 S.E.2d 676 (2012) LEARNING CENTER/OGDEN SCHOOL, INC., d/b/a The Learning Center Charter School v. CHEROKEE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, d/b/a Cherokee County Schools. No. 493P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … Campbell, Asheville, for Cherokee County Board of Education. Richard A. Vinroot, Charlotte, for Learning Center/Ogden School, Inc.

Trustees of the Goldsboro Graded School v. Broadhurst

109 N.C. 228 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1891

The Code, § 707, ¶ 14; Brown v. Commissioners, 100 N. C., 92 ; Wallace v. Trustees, 84 N. C., 164 . … Lane v. Stanly, 65 N. C., 153 . This case is, in no sense, like that of Blanton v. Commissioners, 101 N. C., 532 . There no new debt was in question, *233 or to be paid.

Stephens Ex Rel. Stephens v. Jackson County Board of Education

244 N.C. 481 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1956

Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Seagle

120 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1995

Dare County Board of Education v. Sakaria, 118 N.C. App. 609, 613 , 456 S.E.2d 842, 845 (1995). … (quoting Board of Educ. v. Allen, 243 N.C. 520, 523 , 91 S.E.2d 180, 183 (1956)). Defendants argue that the recent case of Dare County Board of Education v.

Habitat for Humanity of Moore County, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners

187 N.C. App. 764 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

Aubin v. Susi, 149 N.C. App. 320, 324 , 560 S.E.2d 875, 878 (2002) (citation omitted). As the party invoking jurisdiction, plaintiffs have the burden of establishing standing. Neuse River Found. v. … This Court in Street v.

Dusenberry v. Dusenberry

314 N.C. 608 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1985

Wade v. Wade, 72 N.C. App. 372 , 325 S.E. 2d 260 (1984), disc. rev. denied, 313 N.C. 612 , 330 S.E. 2d 616 (1985); Smith v. Smith, 71 N.C. App. 242 , 322 S.E. 2d 393 (1984); and Hinton v. Hinton, 70 N.C. … In the meantime, we allowed plaintiffs petition in Smith v. Smith, one of the cases relied upon by the Court of Appeals in its decision in the case now before us. In Smith v.

Kiddie Korner Day Schools, Inc. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

55 N.C. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1981

Lane v. Stanly, 65 N.C. 153, 157-58 (1871). Further, in Board of Education v. … Coggins v. Board of Education, 223 N.C. 763 , 28 S.E. 2d 527 (1944).

Commissioners of Yancey County v. Road Commissioners of Yancey County

165 N.C. 632 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1914

Tbis decision was approved in Burgin v. Smith, 151 N. C., 567 . In Vaughn v. … tbe statute. *635 In Trustees v.