Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.49s
14 La.App. 5 Cir. 113 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 14, 2015
This final memorandum clearly states that educational incentive pay would be paid monthly to qualifying firefighters “as long as funds are available.” … As discussed above, evidence attached to the Firefighters’ Motion for Summary Judgment clearly shows that these incentive payments accrued monthly to all qualifying firefighters, and were paid at regular intervals of either
Cited 1 timesPublished2013 La.App. 1 Cir. 1889 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 2, 2014
Cameron’s | n education, training, and experience clearly qualified him as an expert as tendered in the field of obstetrics and gynecology: See Bradbury v. … Kastl are qualified to render opinions concerning whether Dr.
Cited 3 timesPublished244 La. 787 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 4, 1963
Privileged occasions are either absolute or ■qualified. … They are absolute when the law protects them with absolute immunity from any prosecution, either civil or criminal, although the publication may be knowingly false and with express malice.
Reversed on other grounds by Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64 (1964)Cited 10 timesPublished94 La.App. 4 Cir. 0410 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 1994
George Hero, who was qualified as an expert in the cause and origin of fires, testified that the shed caught fire and the fire spread to Drury’s office in the main building. … Esso Plaisance, qualified as an expert in the field of the Fire Codes of the City of New Orleans, was hired by Drury to testify concerning alleged Fire Code violations. Mr.
Cited 3 timesPublished788 So. 2d 47 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 2001
To establish a prima facie case under the LHRA, Hook must show: 1) he has a disability; 2) he is a qualified individual for the job in question; and 3) an adverse employment decision was made because of his disability. … The evidence does not clearly establish that Hook was substantially limited in his ability to learn despite his Ritalin treatment.
Cited 9 timesPublishedLisa Alfano v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 2010
Finding that exercise of discretion entitled Officer Menard and LCG to qualified immunity, the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment. … The court in White held the investigating officer had complied with La.R.S. 32:398(D) because he conducted his investigation and obtained the information from the parties actually involved in the accident, and it was clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownMiller, Smith and Champagne v. Capital City Press
142 So. 2d 462 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 21, 1962
There can be no doubt that the identity of the informant could be calculated to lead to admissible evidence which would establish him as "an absolutely reliable source" or an unreliable source, and if the latter be established … "The existence of probable cause is the second requisite for invoking the doctrine of qualified privilege.
Cited 6 timesPublishedThibodeaux v. Southwest La. Hosp. Ass'n
488 So. 2d 743 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 14, 1986
All of this seems to fit clearly within the Louisiana law as codified in Article 2747 of the Civil Code. "Article 2747. CONTRACT OF SERVANT TERMINABLE AT WILL OF THE PARTIES. … Furthermore, the record at this point indicates that even if the elements of defamation existed, that the qualified privilege would apply. See White v. Baker Manor Nursing Home, Inc., 400 So.2d 1168 (La.
Cited 12 timesPublishedHOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF LAKE CHARLES v. Pappion
540 So. 2d 567 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1989
Defendant was eligible for residency in the apartment complex because he established that he was a disabled individual under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1437a(b)(3), by reason of his paranoid schizophrenia. … New York University, supra, discussed this part of Section 504 as follows: "Turning to the Act's term otherwise qualified handicapped individual, it is now clear that this refers to a person who is qualified in spite of her
Cited 1 timesPublished2014 La.App. 4 Cir. 0478 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 2014
Sullivan contends that her pleadings were sufficient to establish an IIED cause of action. … Sullivan’s cause of action for IIED is precluded by the application of the qualified privilege.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMarcantel v. Allen Parish School Bd.
490 So. 2d 1162 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 25, 1986
Any other conclusion would be clearly erroneous. In light of our factual determination that Ms. … No other cause was established. The trial judge did not err in concluding that the condition was a result of the accident. Dr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Democratic Committee, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Third District
238 So. 2d 48 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1970
It is true that they did not change their voting registration, but I think it is clearly evident that it was their intention to establish their home at the Mimosa Park address. … I would personally much prefer that he be qualified and that the electorate of the district make the important decision in which we, as judges of this Court, are much concerned; but I must express my convictions which are
Cited 11 timesPublished772 So. 2d 148 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 4, 2000
It has been held that where a prior disposition is clearly erroneous and will create a grave injustice, it should be reconsidered. Turner v. … Thus, the fact that a maritime employee is injured while on a ship at sea as part of his employment does not qualify him as a member of the vessel's crew, and a maritime employee need not work only on a vessel to qualify
Cited 6 timesPublished832 So. 2d 1089 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 2002
The Act does not expressly state that a healthcare provider, qualified at the time of the medical negligence, qualified at the time of a complaint of medical negligence is filed, and qualified at the time judgment against … Clement's liability for the suffering and the death of the Taylors' child is subject to the manifest error/clearly wrong standard of review as set out in Stobart v.
Cited 5 timesPublished2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 1222 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 23, 2015
not be qualified as an expert. … At the hearing, the burden of establishing reliability shall be upon the proponent of the evidence.
Cited 12 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2002
You state as follows: By codifying the right of free passage for "law enforcement personnel" under the State Police Law with the long established exemption from tolls for state police, the legislature chose to limit the newer … Loren , 587 So.2d 162 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1991) that the court stated "probation officers are peace officers with all of their power and immunities" and cites C.Cr.P. Art. 899 , as does State ex rel Strain v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobinette v. Lafon Nursing Facility of the Holy Family
2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 1363 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2017
Robinette and/or were immune from liability. … Under principles of sovereign immunity, FEMA also is immune from liability based on its alleged failure to provide adequate shelter, medical services, triage, evacuation, and transportation during Hurricane Katrina.
Cited 4 timesPublished383 So. 2d 101 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 30, 1980
'; `I clearly understand what the agreement was [between plaintiff and Mrs. Youngblood].'" … Our brothers on the Second Circuit succinctly stated the law relative to qualified privileges in Carter v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedIn Re: Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Jack Edward Price, II (D)
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 2025
The PCF urges that, in opposing the no right of action exception, the plaintiffs offered evidence which failed to establish three important facts. There was no proof that: (1) Dr. … The Supreme Court in Khammash observed that this was clearly to hold the PCF liable only for acts constituting medical malpractice. Id. at p. 14, 145 So. 3d at 257.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2005
Unless the fundamental rights or privileges and immunities of a person are involved, a strong presumption exists that the legislature in adopting legislation has acted within its constitutional authority. … The opponent must establish clearly and convincingly that the constitutional aim was to deny to the legislature the power to enact the legislation. Id . at 388." We trust the foregoing to be of assistance.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna