Case law

Credle v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 9, 2008

Stat. § 143-291 (a) confers the North Carolina Industrial Commission with jurisdiction to hear tort claims against the State Board of Education, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies … Pulley v. Rex Hospital , 326 N.C. 701 , 392 S.E.2d 380 (1990).

Yale Jewelry Co. v. Joyner

159 N.C. 644 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1912

Brown, J. -The plaintiff shipped to the defendant a “pull board,” together with a quantity of jewelry, razors, etc., on consignment, under a contract by which the title to all the property remained in the plaintiff. … It is unnecessary more particularly to describe the pull board ‘ or to discuss the question as to whether its operation constitutes a lottery or gambling scheme within the definition given in S. v. Perry, 154 N.

Oscar Miller Contractor, Inc. v. North Carolina Tax Review Board

61 N.C. App. 725 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1983

See Duke Power Co. v. Clayton, Comr. of Revenue, 274 N.C. 505 , 164 S.E. 2d 289 (1968). … For the reasons stated in this opinion, we hold the superior court was in error for affirming the order of the Tax Review Board. Reversed and remanded. Judges Hedrick and Becton concur.

Meyer v. Walls

347 N.C. 97 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1997

The State contributes to the school fund, but the local boards select and hire the teachers, other employees and operating personnel. The local boards run the schools. Turner v. … Brown-Graham and Jeffrey S.

McKinney v. Board of Trustees of Mayland Community College

713 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 21, 1989

McKinney v. Rodney C. … Mason v.

McKinney v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control

23 N.C. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1974

The procedure followed in this case in all respects complies with the principles laid down in Wholesale v. ABC Board, 265 N.C. 679 , 144 S.E. 2d 895 (1965). … We are of the opinion that the statutes and the regulations which were in effect at the time of this suspension were not too vague and are constitutionally valid within the rule set out in California v.

Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy Charter School v. Cleveland County Board of Education

236 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 2, 2014

It is immaterial that the school board has earmarked particular funds for a specific purpose if the funds have been deposited in the local current expense fund. Sugar Creek Charter School, Inc. v. … Plaintiffs contend that the local school boards are subject to § 6-19.1 because we have held that they “are deemed agents of the State for purposes of providing public education.” Kiddie Korner Day Schools, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Hill v. Ponder

221 N.C. 58 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1942

McGuinn v. High Point, 219 N. C., 56 , 13 S. E., (2d), 48; Freeman v. Comrs., supra; S. v. Jennette, 190 N. C., 96 , 129 S. E., 184 ; Comrs. v. Bank, 181 N. C., 347 , 107 S. E., 245 ; Jones v. … It was found' by the jury that Buckner, Brown and Freeman were duly qualified chairmen of their respective boards, and that Teague, who had theretofore been chairman of the County Highway Commission was disqualified by his

In Re Osborne

205 N.C. 716 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1934

Ring v. Whitman, 194 N. C., 544 ; In re Chase, 195 N. C., 143 ; S. c., 193 N. C., 450 ; Bonnett-Brown Corporation v. Coble, 195 N. C., 491 . The respondent, Mrs. Anna Harrell, relies on the case of Truelove v. … Brown v. Brown, 101 Ind. R., 340; Van Metre v. Sankey, 39 Am. St. R., 197 .”

American Legion v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

27 N.C. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1975

Boyd v. Allen, 246 N.C. 150 , 97 S.E. 2d 864 . Petitioner’s reliance on Watkins v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 14 N.C. App. 19 , 187 S.E. 2d 500 is misplaced. … Board of Alcoholic Control, 278 N.C. 623 , 181 S.E. 2d 1 , and Food Stores v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 268 N.C. 624 , 151 S.E. 2d 582 , also cited by petitioner, are easily distinguished.

Ginsberg v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina

366 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 13, 2012

Williams v. North Carolina State Board of Education

244 N.C. 599 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1956

The principles of law involved are so fully stated in the case of Greene v. Board of Education, 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E. 2d 129 , no useful purpose would be served by repeating them here.

Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

833 F. Supp. 2d 520 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 2011

Plaintiff Walter Lee Whitaker alleges that Defendants Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education (“Board”), Richard A. … See Owens v. Kaiser Found.

State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Walker

203 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1932

Walker, register of deeds of said county, and clerk *508 ex officio of said board of commissioners (C. … S. v. Young, 106 N. C., 567 , 10 S. E., 1019 . There is no error in the judgment. It is Affirmed.

Board of Education of the Hickory Administrative School Unit v. Seagle

120 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1995

Dare County Board of Education v. Sakaria, 118 N.C. App. 609, 613 , 456 S.E.2d 842, 845 (1995). … (quoting Board of Educ. v. Allen, 243 N.C. 520, 523 , 91 S.E.2d 180, 183 (1956)). Defendants argue that the recent case of Dare County Board of Education v.

Ronald G. Hinson Electric, Inc. v. Union County Board of Education

125 N.C. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1997

See Utilities Comm. v. … .”); Food Stores v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 268 N.C. 624, 628-629 , 151 S.E.2d 582, 586 (1966) (same).

Board of Drainage Commissioners of Lyon Swamp Drainage v. Bordeaux

193 N.C. 627 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1927

See Wilmington v. McDonald, 133 N. C., 548 , and Wilmington v. Cronly, 122 N. C., 390. He cannot, however, be required to pay interest until he is in default. … See Canal Co. v. Whitley, 172 N. C., 100 , Raleigh v. Peace, 110 N. C., 33 ; Eliott on Streets and Roads, 400. *630 C.S., 5362, is section 2 of chapter 282, Public Laws 1919.

Doles v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

160 N.C. 318 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1912

Tbe plaintiff’s intestate, Frank Brown, was killed at Suffolk, Ya., while, as alleged, be was boarding tbe defendant’s passenger train at that place, bound for Margarettsville in tbis State. … Churchill v. Holt, 131 Mass., 77 ( 41 Am. Rep., 193 ).

Dobo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Wilmington

356 N.C. 656 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 2003

Davidson County Broadcasting, Inc. v. Rowan County Board of Commissioners

666 S.E.2d 119 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 2008

666 S.E.2d 119 (2008) DAVIDSON COUNTY BROADCASTING, INC., and Richard and Dorcas Parker, Petitioners v. ROWAN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent Mt. … Anthony Fox, Charlotte, for Board of Commissioners. Benjamin R. Sullivan, Charlotte, Benn A. Brewington, III, Raleigh, for Rowan Bd. Richard R. Reamer, Salisbury, for Preservation Society.