Case law

State Ex Rel. Herring v. Pugh

126 N.C. 852 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1900

Manufacturing Co. v. Buxton , 105 N.C. 76 ; Isler v. Brown , 69 N.C. 125 ; Ellison v. Raleigh , 89 N.C. 125 ; Green v. Griffin , 95 N.C. 52 . … State v. Sanvinet , 24 La. Ann., 119 ; Ex Parte Hickey , 4 Smed. and M. (Miss.), 751. Modified and affirmed. Cited: Moore v. Moore , 131 N.C. 372 ; Worth v. Trust Co. , 152 N.C. 246 ; In re Brown , 168 N.C. 424 .

State Ex Rel. the Guilford County Board of Education v. Herbin

215 N.C. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 2011

Stat. § 84-4 . *355 The Board asserts that our holding in Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp., 155 N.C. App. 205 , 573 S.E.2d 547 (2002) is controlling and cannot be reconciled with the trial court’s conclusion. … The Board’s argument is overruled. Ill In its third issue, the Board argues that the trial court erred in finding that a bail agent’s activity was permitted pursuant to State v.

State v. Richardson

8 N.C. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 27, 1970

State v. Hamilton, 264 N.C. 277, 286 , 141 S.E. 2d 506 (1965). See also State v. Taylor, 250 N.C. 363 , 108 S.E. 2d 629 (1959). … State v. Willoughby, 180 N.C. 676 , 103 S.E. 903 (1920). Likewise, see State v. Weinstein, 224 N.C. 645 , 31 S.E. 2d 920 (1944).

Izard Ex Rel. Izard v. Hickory City Schools Board of Education

68 N.C. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1984

Kiser v. Snyder, 21 N.C. App. 708, 710 , 205 S.E. 2d 619, 621 (1974) (quoting Luna v. Needles Elementary School District, 154 Cal. App. 2d 803 , 316 P. 2d 773 (1957)). … As his own deposition testimony states: I knew I was supposed to take a board and sweep the other board away so I wouldn’t cut my hand but I moved my hand across there and got it up into the blade ...

Rogers v. Powell

174 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1917

Fuel Co. v. Staton, at present term; Comrs. v. McDaniel, 52 N. C., 107 ; Burke v. Elliott, 26 N. C., 355 ; Tar River Co. v. Neal, 10 N. C., 520 ; Brown v. O’Connel, 36 Conn., 432 ; 8 Am. and Eng. … There is nothing in the case of Salisbury v. Croom, 167 N. C., 223 , cited for plaintiff board, that in any way militates against our present decision.

Spencer v. Department of Corr.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 2, 2010

Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. … See Medley v. N.C.

Knight v. Higgs

189 N.C. App. 696 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2008

On 21 November 2006, Judge Brown entered an order affirming the ruling of the Board. The order contained no findings of fact. … The Board Failed to Act Corporately At the hearing before Judge Brown in Superior Court, Mr.

Charter Day School, Inc. v. New Hanover County Board of Education

232 N.C. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2014

See Sugar Creek Charter School, Inc. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 188 N.C. … Without a mandate requiring pre-K admissions, we are left with the holdings of Leandro v. State of North Carolina, 346 N.C. 336, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) (Leandro I), and Hoke County Bd. of Educ. v.

States' Rights Democratic Party v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

229 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 8, 1948

G.S., 163-10 , subsections 2 and 15; G.S., 163-183 ; Burgin v. Board of Elections , 214 N.C. 140 , 198 S.E. 592 . … What was said in Board of Education v. Comrs. , 189 N.C. 650 , 127 S.E. 692 , is relevant here.

Newman v. . Comrs. of Vance

208 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1935

Moore v. Bell , 191 N.C. 305 ; Wood v. Braswell , 192 N.C. 588 ; Yarborough v. N.C. Park Commission , 196 N.C. 284 . … George v. Hardie , 147 N.C. 88 (97).

Martin County v. . Trust Co.

178 N.C. 27 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1919

In Brown v. … Hoke, J., placed the decision upon the ground above stated in Brown v. Comrs .

COUCOULAS/KNIGHT PROPERTIES v. Hillsborough

691 S.E.2d 411 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2010

691 S.E.2d 411 (2010) COUCOULAS/KNIGHT PROPERTIES, LLC v. TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, a North Carolina municipality, and its Board of Commissioners. No. 404A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 15, 2010. … Brown & Bunch, PLLC, by LeAnn Nease Brown, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff/petitioner-appellant. Brough Law Firm, by Robert E. Hornik, Jr., Chapel Hill, for defendant/respondent-appellees. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Lovell v. Mountain River Trucking

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 17, 2011

Brown is board certified in physical medicine and rehabilitation with subspecialty certifications in spinal cord injuries, electrodiagnostic medicine and pain medicine. Dr. … David Kagey, a board certified urologist with Urology Associates Ltd., with complaints of lower back and buttock pain. Dr.

Town & Country Civic Organization v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment

83 N.C. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1986

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E. 2d 379, 383 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E. 2d 106 (1980). … The established rules of the Board are binding on the Board itself, as well as on the public. Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974).

Ginsberg v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina

217 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2011

Crocker v. Roethling, 363 N.C. 140, 142 , 675 S.E.2d 625, 628 (2009) (quotations and citations omitted). … Lenzer v. Flaherty, 106 N.C. App. 496, 509 , 418 S.E.2d 276, 284 (1992) (citations omitted).

Davis v. Durham Mental Health/Development Disabilities/Substance Abuse Area Authority

165 N.C. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2004

“An improper purpose is ‘any purpose other than one to vindicate rights ... or to put claims of right to a proper test.’ ” Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 382 , 477 S.E.2d 234, 238 (1996) (quoting Mack v. … Brown, 124 N.C. App. at 382 , 477 S.E.2d at 238 (quoting Bryson, 330 N.C. at 663 , 412 S.E.2d at 337 ).

Ragsdale v. Kennedy

286 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 26, 1974

Defendant Brown had been a stockholder since incorporation and was a member of the board of directors when the transaction took place. The other defendants became stockholders and board members on 6 June 1972. … Brown, 196 N.C. 685 , 146 S.E. 803 (1929).

Cooper v. Board of Education for Nash-Rocky Mount Schools

135 N.C. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1999

See Presnell v. … Petitioner was an at-will employee who could be terminated by the Board for any reason or for an arbitrary reason. See Sides v. Duke Hospital, 74 *205 N.C.

Wynn v. TRUSTEES OF CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYS.

255 N.C. 594 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1961

They contend such operation would be in violation of the 1954 and 1955 decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 98 L. … The decisions in the Brown case were considered and discussed by this Court in 1956 in Constantian v. Anson County, 244 N.C. 221 , 93 S.E.2d 163 .

Bellsouth Carolinas PCS, L.P. v. Henderson County Zoning Board of Adjustment

174 N.C. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2005

See Herring v. Liner, 163 N.C. … See Utilities Comm. v. Simpson, 295 N.C. 519 , 246 S.E.2d 753 (1978); Utilities Comm. v.